Skip to main content

New Refinement of an Intelligent System Design for Naval Operations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovations in Mechatronics Engineering (icieng 2021)

Abstract

To better optimize the decision chain in a maritime disaster context, allowing a reduction both in time of support and costs, recently, the authors considered the facilities and high qualified staff of Portuguese Navy proposing a variant of the Delphi method, a method where the opinion of each element of a team is considered an important information source to contribute to a decision, implementing a system that prioritize certain teams for perform specific in incidents, taking into account the importance of each team that acts in case of a disaster occurrence.

Continuing the work developed recently and extending the technique used before, in the present manuscript, we propose an adjustment of each expert opinion weight when the Delphi method is applied. The weight of each expert does not not depend on years of expert experience exclusively but also from the type of such experience. Firstly, we have used the hierarchical classification, allowing to identify different patterns for experts with the “‘same experience”’. Also discriminant analysis and multidimensional scaling revealed to be adequate techniques for this issue. The experience of each expert was evaluated using the proximity/distance between the individuals in the group of proposed experts and compared with the number of consensus presented.

We hope to have given an improvement to the optimization o the decision support system used in a maritime disaster context of the Portuguese Navy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Powell, C.: The delphi technique: myths and realities. Methodol. Issues Nurs. Res. 41(4), 376–382 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reuven, L., Dongchui, H.: Choosing a technological forecasting method. Ind. Manage. 37(1), 14–22 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duuvarci, Y., Selvi, O., Gunaydin, O., Gür, G.: Impacts of transportation projects on urban trends in zmir. Teknik Dergi 19(1), 4293–4318 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simões-Marques, M., Correia, A., Teodoro, M., Nunes, I.: Building a decision support system to handle teams in disaster situations - a preliminary approach. In: Nunes, I. (ed.) Proceedings of Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions, AHFE 2017 Conference on Human Factors and System Interactions, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 97–108. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60366-7_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Nunes, I.L., Lucas, R., Simões-Marques, M., Correia, N.: Augmented reality in support of disaster response. In: Nunes, I. (ed.) Proceedings of Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions, AHFE 2017 Conference on Human Factors and System Interactions, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 155–167. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60366-7_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Marques, M., Elvas, F., Nunes, I., Lobo, V., Correia, A.: Augmented reality in the context of naval operations. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Taiar, R. (eds.) IHSED 2018, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 307–313. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02053-8_47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Nunes, I., Lucas, R., Simões-Marques, M., Correia, N.: An augmented reality application to support deployed emergency teams. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 195–204. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96077-7_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Nunes, I., Calhamonas, G., Simões-Marques, M., Teodoro, M.: Building a decision support system to handle teams in disaster situations - a preliminary approach. In: Madureira, A., Abraham, A., Gandhi, N., Varela, M. (eds.) Hybrid Intelligent Systems. HIS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 551–559. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14347-3_54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Simões Marques, J., Teodoro, M.F., Calhamonas, G., Nunes, I.: Applying a variation of delphi method for knowledge elicitation in the context of an intelligent system design. In: Nunes, I. (ed.) Proceedings of Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions, AHFE 2019 Conference on Human Factors and System Interactions, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 386–398. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20040-4_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Thurstone, L.: Multiple fator analysis. Psychol. Rev. 38, 406–427 (1931)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thurstone, L.: Primary Mental Abilities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thurstone, L., Thurstone, T.: Fator Studies of Intelligence. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1941)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Carroll, J., Green, P.: Psychometric methods in marketing research: part ii, multidimensional scaling. J. Mark. Res. 34(2), 193–204 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Young, G., Householder, A.: Discussion of a set of point in terms of their mutual distances. Psychometrika 3, 19–22 (1938). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287916

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Torgerson, W.: Multidimensional scaling: i. theory and method. Psychometrika 17, 401–419 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288916

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Torgerson, W.: Theory and Methods of Scaling. Wiley, Chicago (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pasquali, L.: Instrumentos Psicológicos: Manual Prático De Elaboração. LabPAM, Brasília (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Silva, J., Ribeiro-Filho, N.: Avaliação e Mensuração da Dor: Pesquisa. Teoria e Prática. FUNPEC, Ribeirão Preto (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sturrock, K., Rocha, J.: A multidimensional scaling stress evaluation table. Field Methods 12, 49–60 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kruskal, J., Wish, M.: Multidimensional Scaling. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (1978). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985130

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Skulmoski, G., Hartman, F., Krahn, J.: The delphi method for graduate research. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 6, 1–24 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lilja, K., Laakso, K., Palomki, J.: Using the delphi method. In: Kocaoglu, D. (ed.) Technology Management in the Energy Smart World, PICMET 2011, pp. 1–10. Piscataway (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5138006

  23. Linstone, H., Turoff, M.: The Delphi Method-Techniques and Applications. New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Gunaydin, H.: Impact of Information Technologies on Project Management Functions. Ph.D. dissertation, Chicago University (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. De Vet, E., Brug, J., De Nooijer, J., Dijkstra, A., De Vries, N.: Determinants of forward stage transitions: a delphi study. Health Educ. Res. 20(2), 195–205 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wissema, J.: Trends in technology forecasting. Res. Dev. Manage. 12(1), 27–36 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fraga, M.: A economia circular na indústria portuguesa de pasta, papel e cartão. Master thesis, FCT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Adler, M., Ziglio, E.: Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and its Application to Social Policy and Public Health. Kingsley Publishers, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Azevedo, S., Carvalho, H., Machado, V.: Agile index: automotive supply chain. Eng. Technol. 79, 784–790 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Azevedo, S., Govindan, K., Carvalho, H., Machado, V.: Ecosilient index to assess the grenness and resilience of the up stream automotive supply chain. J. Cleaner Prod. 56, 131–146 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Landeta, J.: Current validity of the delphi method in social sciences. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 73(5), 467–482 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rowe, G., Wright, G.: The delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. Int. J. Forecast. 14(4), 353–375 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Portuguese funds through the Center of Naval Research (CINAV), Portuguese Naval Academy, Portugal and The Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), through the Center for Computational and Stochastic Mathematics (CEMAT), University of Lisbon, Portugal, project UID/Multi/04621/2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Filomena Teodoro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Teodoro, M.F., Marques, M.J.S., Nunes, I., Calhamonas, G., Andrade, M.A.P. (2022). New Refinement of an Intelligent System Design for Naval Operations. In: Machado, J., Soares, F., Trojanowska, J., Yildirim, S. (eds) Innovations in Mechatronics Engineering. icieng 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79168-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics