Abstract
This work aims to analyze and summarize the teaching work of design postgraduate students. The article demonstrates a design method based on evaluation and research, and applies this method to teaching. Use research methods such as literature research, case research, teaching practice, and analogy analysis. Firstly, related concepts such as design evaluation and design research are combed out through literature research, and relationships between them. Then, teaching plan of human factors and interaction related courses of the School of Design and Art of Beijing Institute of Technology from 2015 to 2019 are summarized, including three parts of theoretical study, design evaluation and design research, design practice. Lastly, the teaching experience and models are obtained through the comparison of various types of design courses. Evaluation and research are indispensable parts of design. Design teaching with evaluation and research as the starting point is sufficient to make students pay attention to design improvements based on current products.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Friedman, K.: Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods. J. Des. Stud. 24(6), 507–522 (2003)
Collins, A., Joseph, D., Bielaczyc, K.: Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. J. Learn. Sci. 13(1), 15–42 (2004)
Archer, L.B.: A view of the nature of design research. In: Jacques, R., Powell, J., (eds.): Design: Science: Method. Westbury House, Guildford (1981)
Simon, H.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Evenson, S.: Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 493–502. ACM Press (2007)
Verschuren, P., Hartog, R.: Evaluation in design-oriented research. Qual. Quant. 39, 733–762 (2005)
Rubin, J.: Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. Wiley, New York (1994)
Brooke, J.: SUS: a ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, I.L., (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the School of Design and Art, Beijing Institute of Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sun, Y., Wen, Z., Zhang, S. (2021). Experience in Teaching Design of Human-Computer Interaction Through Evaluation and Research. In: Rebelo, F. (eds) Advances in Ergonomics in Design. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 261. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79760-7_55
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79760-7_55
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79759-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79760-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)