Skip to main content

Spatial Needs for Non-driving Related Activities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Simulation and Digital Human Modeling (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 264))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Due to the temporary abandonment of driving tasks in conditionally automated driving (SAE Level 3), the driver is able to devote the available time and attention to non-driving related activities, while the vehicle takes on more and more driving tasks. The aim of this work is to investigate how much space the driver needs for non-driving activities and to what extent the space requirements of different non-driving activities differ. A mock-up study is carried out at the Chair of Ergonomics at the Technical University of Munich, in which test subjects carry out various non-driving related activities. The longitudinal distance between the center of the steering wheel and the subject’s chest is measured, which serves as a measure of the required space of non-driving activities. The data shows significant differences concerning the factor “activities”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dingus, T., Klauer, S., Lewis, V., Petersen, A., Lee, S., Sudweeks, J., Perez, M., Hankey, J., Ramsey, D., Gupta, S., et al.: DOT HS 810 593: the 100-car naturalistic driving study phase II. Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pfleging, B., Schmidt, A.: (Non-)driving-related activities in the car: defining driver activities for manual and automated driving. https://www.hcilab.org/wp-content/uploads/chi15-ws-nondriving-activities.pdf

  3. Huemer, A.K., Vollrath, M.: Ablenkung durch fahrfremde Tätigkeiten - Machbarkeitsstudie. Bericht zum Forschungsprojekt FE 82.376/2009. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yang, Y., Klinkner, J.N., Bengler, K.: How will the driver sit in an automated vehicle? – the qualitative and quantitative descriptions of non-driving postures (NDPs) when non-driving-related-tasks (NDRTs) are conducted. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), vol. 823, pp. 409–420. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. König, M., Neumayr, L.: Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: the case of the self-driving car. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 44, 42–52 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang, Y., Fleischer, M., Bengler, K.: Chicken or egg problem? New challenges and proposals of digital human modeling and interior development of automated vehicles. In: Di Nicolantonio, M., Rossi, E., Alexander, T. (eds.) Advances in Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping, Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conference on Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping, July 24–28, 2019, Washington D.C., USA, vol. 975, pp. 453–463. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. van der Meulen, P., Seidl, A.: Ramsis – the leading cad tool for ergonomic analysis of vehicles. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) First International Conference on Digital Human Modeling, ICDHM 2007, Held as Part of HCI International 2007, Beijing, China, July 22–27, 2007, Proceedings, vol. 4561, pp. 1008–1017. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. On-Road Automated Driving (ORAD) Committee: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. SAE International, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States (2018). https://saemobilus.sae.org/content/j3016_201806

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted in the context of the project INSAA funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of the Federal Republic of Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Fleischer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fleischer, M., Li, R. (2021). Spatial Needs for Non-driving Related Activities. In: Wright, J.L., Barber, D., Scataglini, S., Rajulu, S.L. (eds) Advances in Simulation and Digital Human Modeling. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 264. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79763-8_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics