Skip to main content

Exploiting Interdependence in Autonomous Human-Machine Systems to Avoid Disaggregation and Vulnerability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Simulation and Digital Human Modeling (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 264))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1160 Accesses

Abstract

We review the interdependence theory of complementarity for autonomous human-machine teams (A-HMTs) operating in open systems. In open systems, interdependence theory is state dependent, reactive to every situation, including uncertainty. Reactiveness to uncertainty explains why the best teams are highly interdependent, outperforming the same members of a team when they are acting independently as disaggregated individuals. A key ingredient we argue is that highly-effective team members are in orthogonal roles, reducing the degrees of freedom and entropy. In contrast, we also briefly review the competing, rational theories of interdependence that promote disaggregation: social interdependence (cooperation theory), games (applied social interdependence theory), innovation (the atomistic, rational “homo economicus” of economics theory), and system dynamics (the interdependence of feedback under certainty); in conjunction, we review the problems with generalizing, applying or scaling rational but closed system theories to the design and operation of A-HMTs and systems facing uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bisbey, T.M., Reyes, D.L., Traylor, A.M., Salas, E.: Teams of psychologists helping teams: the evolution of the science of team training. Am. Psych. 74(3), 278–289 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T.: Cooperation and competition. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn, pp. 856–861 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24051-8

  3. Darwin, C.: The Descent of Man. Appleton, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hare, B., Woods, V.: Survival of the Friendliest. Penguin Random House, New York (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mann, R.P.: Collective decision making by rational individuals. PNAS 115(44), E10387–E10396 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lawless, W.F., Mittu, R., Sofge, D.A., Hiatt, L.: Editorial, AI, autonomy and human-machine teams: interdependence, context and explainable AI. AI Mag. 40(3), 5–13 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mims, C.: On the 100th Anniversary of ‘Robot,’ They’re Finally Taking Over. Wall Street Journal (2021). https://www.wsj.com/articles. Accessed 23 Jan 2020

  8. Rees, M.: Dreams of a rational world. A long-term look at the future of humanity. IAI News (2021). https://iai.tv/articles/dreams-of-a-rational-world-auid-1732?

  9. Lawless, W.F.: Quantum-like interdependence theory advances autonomous human–machine teams A-HMTs. Entropy 22(11), 1227 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/e22111227

  10. Cummings, J.: Team Science Successes and Challenges. NSF Sponsored Workshop Fundamentals of Team Science & Science of Team Science, Bethesda, MD (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cooke, N.: Effective human-artificial intelligence teaming. In: AAAI-2020 Spring Symposium, Stanford, CA (2020). https://aaai.org/Symposia/Spring/sss20symposia.php#ss03

  12. Lewin, K.: Field theory of social science. D. Cartwright (ed.). Harper & Brothers, New York (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Walden, D.D., Roedler, G.J., Forsberg, K.J., Hamelin, R.D., Shortell, T.M. (eds.) Systems Engineering Handbook, 4th edn. INCOSE-TP-2003-002-04. Wiley, Hoboken (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lawless, W.F.: The entangled nature of interdependence. Bistability, irreproducibility and uncertainty. J. Math. Psychol. 78, 51–64 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Lawless, W.F.: The physics of teams: interdependence, measurable entropy and computational emotion. Front. Phys. 5, 30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2017.00030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. von Neumann, J., Wheeler, N.A. (ed.): Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. New Edition. R.T. Beyer (Tr.). Princeton University Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Friedman, G.: U.S.A. Russia’s Search for Strategic Depth, Geopolitical Futures (2020). https://geopoliticalfutures.com/russias-search-for-strategic-depth/

  18. Lawless, W.F.: Towards an epistemology of interdependence among the orthogonal roles in human–machine teams. Found. Sci. 26(1), 129–142 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-019-09632-5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Berscheid, E., Reis, H.T.: Attraction and close relationships. In: Gilbert, D.T., Lindzey, G., Fiske, S.T. (eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology 2, 4th edn. Erlbaum, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jones, E.E.: Major developments in five decades of soc psych. In: Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T., Lindzey, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 3–57. McGraw-Hill, Boston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Amadae, S.M.: Rational choice theory. Encyclopaedia Britannica (2017). https://www.britannica.com/topic/rational-choice-theory

  22. Lawless, W.F.: The interdependence of autonomous human-machine teams: the entropy of teams, but not individuals, advances science. Entropy 21(12), 1195 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lundvall, B.A.: The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope. Anthem Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pearl, J.: Reasoning with Cause and Effect. AI Mag. 23(1), 95–111 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pearl, J., Mackenzie, D.: AI Can’t Reason Why. Wall Street J. (2018). https://www.wsj.com/articles/ai-cant-reason-why-1526657442

  26. Gold, R., Evans, M.: Why Did Covid Overwhelm Hospitals? A Years long Drive for Efficiency. Wall Street J. (2020). https://www.wsj.com/articles/hospitals

  27. Forrester, J.W.: The Beginning of System Dynamics. MIT, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tetlock, P.E., Gardner, D.: Superforecasting: The Art & Sci of Prediction, Crown (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lawless, W.F., Sofge, D.A.: The intersection of robust intelligence & trust. In: Lawless, W.F., Mittu, R., Sofge, D., Russell, S. (eds.) Autonomy & AI: A Threat or Savior? Springer, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. McFadden, J., Al-Khalili, J.: The origins of quantum biology. In: Proceedings Royal Society A, vol. 474, p. 20180674 (2018). rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Lawless .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lawless, W. (2021). Exploiting Interdependence in Autonomous Human-Machine Systems to Avoid Disaggregation and Vulnerability. In: Wright, J.L., Barber, D., Scataglini, S., Rajulu, S.L. (eds) Advances in Simulation and Digital Human Modeling. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 264. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79763-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics