Skip to main content

Preliminary Evaluation of Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methodology for Emergency Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 265))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 986 Accesses

Abstract

Decision-making related to emergencies and disasters is a daunting process given the dynamic and complex nature of such events, the wide range of factors to manage, and the large amount of information to consider. To address the challenge, the long-term goals of this work advocate for the use of an adaptive intelligent system to assist with these complex decision tasks. This paper provides background for MCDM methods and their uses and develops and proposes a taxonomy of eleven questions for use in selecting MCDM methods within complex decision-making environments such as emergency management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary. Decision-making. Cambridge (GB). Cambridge University Press (2017). https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/decision-making. Accessed 21 Aug 2020

  2. Sitorus, F., Cilliers, J.J., Brito-Parada, P.R.: Multi-criteria decision making for the choice problem in mining and mineral processing: applications and trends. Expert Syst. Appl. 121, 393–417 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tzeng, G.H., Huang, J.J.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Zsambok, C.E., Klein, G. (eds.): Naturalistic Decision Making. Psychology Press, Hove (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caylor, J.P., Hammell, R.J., Hanratty, T.P., Heilman, E.G., Richardson, J.T.: The effects of situational context on information valuation. In: Karwowski, W., Ahram, T. (eds.) IHSI 2019. AISC, pp. 465–470. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11051-2_70

  6. Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, T.M., Venkatesan, V.P.: A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. Am. J. Info. Syst. 1(1), 3143 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. FEMA: Introduction to Emergency Management. Emmitsburg, MD: EMI (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. FEMA: National Incident Management System (FEMA 501/Draft), Washington, DC, 176 pages, August 2007. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-nims.pdf

  9. Ishizaka, A., Labib, A.: A hybrid and integrated approach to evaluate and prevent disasters. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 65(10), 1475–1489 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan, W., Armenakis, C.: 3D building evacuation route modelling and visualization. ISPRS. 40(2), 221 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Angel, R.M., Ambat, S.C., Ballera, M.A., Raviz, J.G.: Implementation of least cost path analysis and fuzzy logic for the development of emergency response application. IJSSST 20 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, J., Li, Q., Liu, C., Khan, S.U., Ghani, N.: Community-based collaborative information system for emergency management. Comput. Oper. Res. 42, 116–124 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., Valipour, A.: Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications–a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Econ. Res. Ekonomska Istraživanja 28(1), 516–571 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Campanella, G., Ribeiro, R.A.: A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making. Decis. Support Sys. 52(1), 52–60 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Campanella, G., Ribeiro, R.A.: Multiple attribute decision making in a dynamic environment. In: World Conference on Soft Computing, San Francisco, CA, 32–26 May 2011 (2011b)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xu, L., Yang, J.B.: Introduction to multi-criteria decision making and the evidential reasoning approach. Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester. Working Paper No. 0106 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dodgson, J.S., Spackman, M., Pearman, A., Phillips, L.D.: Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. Department for Communities and Local Government, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keeney, R.L.: Decision analysis: an overview. Oper. Res. 30(5), 803–838 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Roy, B.: Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding, vol. 12. Springer, New York (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1

  20. Tsoukiàs, A.: On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective. Ann. Oper. Res. 154(1), 3–27 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh, A., Malik, S.K.: Major MCDM techniques and their application - a review. IOSR J. Eng. 4(5), 15–25 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Velasquez, M., Hester, P.T.: An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res. 10(2), 56–66 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arrais-Castro, A., Varela, M.L.R., Putnik, G.D., Ribeiro, R., Dargam, F.C.: Collaborative negotiation platform using a dynamic multi-criteria decision model. Int. J. Decis. Support Syst. 7(1), 1–14 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Varela, M.L.R., Ribeiro, R.A.: Distributed manufacturing scheduling based on a dynamic multi-criteria decision model. In: Zadeh, L.A., Abbasov, A.M., Yager, R.R., Shahbazova, S.N., Marek, Z. (eds.) Recent Developments and New Directions in Soft Computing, pp. 81–93. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Chauhan, A., Vaish, R.: Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach. Mater. Des. (1980–2015) 36, 1–5 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Kildienė, S.: State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 20(1), 165–179 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nijssen, D.: Improving Spatiality in Decision Making for River Basin Management. Schriftenreihe Hydrologie/Wasserwirtschaft (27). Bochum (Germany): Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Lehrstuhl für Hydrologie, Wasserwirtschaft undUmwelttechnik (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sarraf, R., McGuire, M.P.: A data integration and analysis system for safe route planning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering (IKE). The Steering Committee of the World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp), pp. 111–117 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Göztepe, K., Atak, E., Erdoğan, H.İ., Kılınç, E., Şensoy, S.E.: A multicriteria decision making model for military logistics using analytic network process (2013). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/efd5/f636334e8416c4bdb65425c9ae8f0471db2d.pdf. Accessed 2 Sep 2020

  31. Haddad, M., Sanders, D.: Selection of discrete multiple criteria decision making methods in the presence of risk and uncertainty. Oper. Res. Perspect. 5, 357–370 (2018)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Kornyshova, E., Salinesi, C.: MCDM techniques selection approaches: state of the art. 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, pp. 22–29. IEEE, April 2007

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roy, B., Słowiński, R.: Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. Eur. J. Decis. Process. 1(1), 69–97 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cinelli, M., Coles, S.R., Kirwan, K.: Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment. Ecol. Indic. 46, 138–148 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cinelli, M., Kadziński, M., Gonzalez, M., Słowiński, R.: How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy. Omega 96, 102261 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Saaty, T.L., Ergu, D.: When is a decision-making method trustworthy? Criteria for evaluating multi-criteria decision-making methods. IJITDM 14(06), 1171–1187 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zandebasiri, M., Pourhashemi, M.: The place of AHP method among multi criteria decision making methods in forest management. IJAOR 6(2), 75–89 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., Zioło, M.: Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega 86, 107–124 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., Zioło, M.: Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection: rule set database and exemplary decision support system implementation blueprints. Data Brief. 22, 639 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Munier. N.: 300-Tool for selecting the most appropriate MCDM method to solve a problem (2019). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23243.03360

  41. Bajec, P., Tuljak-Suban, D.: A framework for detecting the proper multi-criteria decision-making method taking into account the characteristics of third-party logistics, the requirements of managers, and the type of input data. In: García Márquez, F.P. (ed.) Application of Decision Science in Business and Management. IntechOpen, London (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cutter, S.L., Boruff, B.J., Shirley, W.L.: Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc. Sci. Q. 84(2), 242–261 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Flanagan, B.E., Gregory, E.W., Hallisey, E.J., Heitgerd, J.L., Lewis, B.: A social vulnerability index for disaster management. J. Homeland Secur. Emerg. Manage. 8(1) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Flanagan, B.E., Hallisey, E.J., Adams, E., Lavery, A.: Measuring community vulnerability to natural and anthropogenic hazards: the centers for disease control and prevention’s social vulnerability index. J. Environ. Health 80(10), 34 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research was sponsored by the Army Research Laboratory and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-19-2-0062. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justine P. Caylor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Caylor, J.P., Hammell, R.J., Raglin, A.J. (2021). Preliminary Evaluation of Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methodology for Emergency Management. In: Nunes, I.L. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 265. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79816-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79816-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79815-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79816-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics