Abstract
Decision-making related to emergencies and disasters is a daunting process given the dynamic and complex nature of such events, the wide range of factors to manage, and the large amount of information to consider. To address the challenge, the long-term goals of this work advocate for the use of an adaptive intelligent system to assist with these complex decision tasks. This paper provides background for MCDM methods and their uses and develops and proposes a taxonomy of eleven questions for use in selecting MCDM methods within complex decision-making environments such as emergency management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary. Decision-making. Cambridge (GB). Cambridge University Press (2017). https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/decision-making. Accessed 21 Aug 2020
Sitorus, F., Cilliers, J.J., Brito-Parada, P.R.: Multi-criteria decision making for the choice problem in mining and mineral processing: applications and trends. Expert Syst. Appl. 121, 393–417 (2019)
Tzeng, G.H., Huang, J.J.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)
Zsambok, C.E., Klein, G. (eds.): Naturalistic Decision Making. Psychology Press, Hove (2014)
Caylor, J.P., Hammell, R.J., Hanratty, T.P., Heilman, E.G., Richardson, J.T.: The effects of situational context on information valuation. In: Karwowski, W., Ahram, T. (eds.) IHSI 2019. AISC, pp. 465–470. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11051-2_70
Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, T.M., Venkatesan, V.P.: A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. Am. J. Info. Syst. 1(1), 3143 (2013)
FEMA: Introduction to Emergency Management. Emmitsburg, MD: EMI (1995)
FEMA: National Incident Management System (FEMA 501/Draft), Washington, DC, 176 pages, August 2007. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-nims.pdf
Ishizaka, A., Labib, A.: A hybrid and integrated approach to evaluate and prevent disasters. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 65(10), 1475–1489 (2014)
Chan, W., Armenakis, C.: 3D building evacuation route modelling and visualization. ISPRS. 40(2), 221 (2014)
De Angel, R.M., Ambat, S.C., Ballera, M.A., Raviz, J.G.: Implementation of least cost path analysis and fuzzy logic for the development of emergency response application. IJSSST 20 (2019)
Li, J., Li, Q., Liu, C., Khan, S.U., Ghani, N.: Community-based collaborative information system for emergency management. Comput. Oper. Res. 42, 116–124 (2014)
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., Valipour, A.: Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications–a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Econ. Res. Ekonomska Istraživanja 28(1), 516–571 (2015)
Campanella, G., Ribeiro, R.A.: A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making. Decis. Support Sys. 52(1), 52–60 (2011)
Campanella, G., Ribeiro, R.A.: Multiple attribute decision making in a dynamic environment. In: World Conference on Soft Computing, San Francisco, CA, 32–26 May 2011 (2011b)
Xu, L., Yang, J.B.: Introduction to multi-criteria decision making and the evidential reasoning approach. Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester. Working Paper No. 0106 (2001)
Dodgson, J.S., Spackman, M., Pearman, A., Phillips, L.D.: Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. Department for Communities and Local Government, London (2009)
Keeney, R.L.: Decision analysis: an overview. Oper. Res. 30(5), 803–838 (1982)
Roy, B.: Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding, vol. 12. Springer, New York (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1
Tsoukià s, A.: On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective. Ann. Oper. Res. 154(1), 3–27 (2007)
Singh, A., Malik, S.K.: Major MCDM techniques and their application - a review. IOSR J. Eng. 4(5), 15–25 (2014)
Velasquez, M., Hester, P.T.: An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res. 10(2), 56–66 (2013)
Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)
Arrais-Castro, A., Varela, M.L.R., Putnik, G.D., Ribeiro, R., Dargam, F.C.: Collaborative negotiation platform using a dynamic multi-criteria decision model. Int. J. Decis. Support Syst. 7(1), 1–14 (2015)
Varela, M.L.R., Ribeiro, R.A.: Distributed manufacturing scheduling based on a dynamic multi-criteria decision model. In: Zadeh, L.A., Abbasov, A.M., Yager, R.R., Shahbazova, S.N., Marek, Z. (eds.) Recent Developments and New Directions in Soft Computing, pp. 81–93. Springer, Cham (2014)
Chauhan, A., Vaish, R.: Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach. Mater. Des. (1980–2015) 36, 1–5 (2012)
Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Kildienė, S.: State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 20(1), 165–179 (2014)
Nijssen, D.: Improving Spatiality in Decision Making for River Basin Management. Schriftenreihe Hydrologie/Wasserwirtschaft (27). Bochum (Germany): Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Lehrstuhl für Hydrologie, Wasserwirtschaft undUmwelttechnik (2013)
Sarraf, R., McGuire, M.P.: A data integration and analysis system for safe route planning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering (IKE). The Steering Committee of the World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp), pp. 111–117 (2018)
Göztepe, K., Atak, E., Erdoğan, H.İ., Kılınç, E., Şensoy, S.E.: A multicriteria decision making model for military logistics using analytic network process (2013). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/efd5/f636334e8416c4bdb65425c9ae8f0471db2d.pdf. Accessed 2 Sep 2020
Haddad, M., Sanders, D.: Selection of discrete multiple criteria decision making methods in the presence of risk and uncertainty. Oper. Res. Perspect. 5, 357–370 (2018)
Kornyshova, E., Salinesi, C.: MCDM techniques selection approaches: state of the art. 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, pp. 22–29. IEEE, April 2007
Roy, B., Słowiński, R.: Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. Eur. J. Decis. Process. 1(1), 69–97 (2013)
Cinelli, M., Coles, S.R., Kirwan, K.: Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment. Ecol. Indic. 46, 138–148 (2014)
Cinelli, M., Kadziński, M., Gonzalez, M., Słowiński, R.: How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy. Omega 96, 102261 (2020)
Saaty, T.L., Ergu, D.: When is a decision-making method trustworthy? Criteria for evaluating multi-criteria decision-making methods. IJITDM 14(06), 1171–1187 (2015)
Zandebasiri, M., Pourhashemi, M.: The place of AHP method among multi criteria decision making methods in forest management. IJAOR 6(2), 75–89 (2016)
Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., Zioło, M.: Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega 86, 107–124 (2019)
Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., Zioło, M.: Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection: rule set database and exemplary decision support system implementation blueprints. Data Brief. 22, 639 (2019)
Munier. N.: 300-Tool for selecting the most appropriate MCDM method to solve a problem (2019). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23243.03360
Bajec, P., Tuljak-Suban, D.: A framework for detecting the proper multi-criteria decision-making method taking into account the characteristics of third-party logistics, the requirements of managers, and the type of input data. In: GarcÃa Márquez, F.P. (ed.) Application of Decision Science in Business and Management. IntechOpen, London (2019)
Cutter, S.L., Boruff, B.J., Shirley, W.L.: Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc. Sci. Q. 84(2), 242–261 (2003)
Flanagan, B.E., Gregory, E.W., Hallisey, E.J., Heitgerd, J.L., Lewis, B.: A social vulnerability index for disaster management. J. Homeland Secur. Emerg. Manage. 8(1) (2011)
Flanagan, B.E., Hallisey, E.J., Adams, E., Lavery, A.: Measuring community vulnerability to natural and anthropogenic hazards: the centers for disease control and prevention’s social vulnerability index. J. Environ. Health 80(10), 34 (2018)
Acknowledgments
Research was sponsored by the Army Research Laboratory and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-19-2-0062. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation herein.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Caylor, J.P., Hammell, R.J., Raglin, A.J. (2021). Preliminary Evaluation of Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methodology for Emergency Management. In: Nunes, I.L. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 265. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79816-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79816-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79815-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79816-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)