Skip to main content

A Distributed Mission-Planning Framework for Shared UAV Use in Multi-operator MUM-T Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Robots, Unmanned Systems and Cybersecurity (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 268))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This contribution presents a framework to support the planning of Manned-Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T) missions in which unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are shared among multiple distributed users. To negotiate the provision of requested UAV services, we modeled a centralized task allocation procedure that uses individual utility values to represent the preferences of requester and provider. Our initial approach solves the planning problem classically, by directly accounting for utility and costs. A second approach extends this in favor of a universal application that does not rely on direct accountability. This second approach however presents potential limitations in finding the optimal solution as well as increased computation costs. Both approaches were integrated and tested in a helicopter research simulator. Study results indicate that both approaches provide the same solution quality. We conclude that, regardless of the implemented method, UAVs can be effectively shared between distributed users through a centralized task allocation model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Uhrmann, J., Strenzke, R., Rauschert, A., Meitinger, C., Schulte, A.: Manned-unmanned teaming: artificial cognition applied to multiple UAV guidance. In: NATO RTO SCI-202 Symposium on Intelligent Uninhabited Vehicle Guidance Systems, Neubiberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Strenzke, R., Uhrmann, J., Benzler, A., Maiwald, F., Rauschert, A., Schulte, A.: Managing cockpit crew excess task load in military manned-unmanned teaming missions by dual-mode cognitive automation approaches. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Portland, pp. 6237–6260 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schulte, A., Donath, D.: Cognitive engineering approach to human-autonomy teaming (HAT). In: 20th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, J.Y., Barnes, M.J., Harper-Sciarini, M.: Supervisory control of multiple robots: human-performance issues and user-interface design. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 41(4), 435–454 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roth, G., Schulte, A.: A concept on the shared use of unmanned assets by multiple users in a manned-unmanned-teaming application. In: Harris, D., Li, W.-C. (eds.) HCII 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12187, pp. 189–202. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49183-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiederhold, G.: The Architecture of Future Information Systems. A Mediator Architecture for Abstract Data Access. Report No. STAN-CS-90–1303, Stanford University, pp. 1–36 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Genesereth, M.R., Ketchpel, S.P.: Software agents. Commun. ACM 37(7), 48 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klusch, M., Sycara, K.: Brokering and matchmaking for coordination of agent societies: a survey. In: Omicini, A., Zambonelli, F., Klusch, M. (eds.) Coordination of Internet Agents, pp. 197–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04401-8_8

  9. Decker, K., Williamson, M., Sycara, K.: Matchmaking and brokering. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 432 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arisha, K., Ozcan, F., Ross, R., Kraus, S., Subrahmanian, V.S.: IMPACT: the interactive Maryland platform for agents collaborating together. In: Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems, pp. 385–386. IEEE (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mahmoud, S., Mohamed, N.: Collaborative UAVs cloud. In: 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pp. 365–373. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Uhrmann, J., Schulte, A.: Concept, design and evaluation of cognitive task-based UAV guidance. Int. J. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5(1), 145–158 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Uhrmann, J., Schulte, A.: Task-based guidance of multiple UAV using Cognitive automation. In: COGNITIVE 2011, The Third International Conference on Advanced Cognitive Technologies and Applications, pp. 47–52 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple attribute decision making. In: Yoon, K. (ed.) Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey. LNE, vol. 186. Springer, Berlin (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunar Roth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Roth, G., Schulte, A. (2021). A Distributed Mission-Planning Framework for Shared UAV Use in Multi-operator MUM-T Applications. In: Zallio, M., Raymundo Ibañez, C., Hernandez, J.H. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Robots, Unmanned Systems and Cybersecurity. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 268. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79997-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics