Abstract
It is acknowledged that humans expect social robots to interact in a similar way as in human-human interaction. To create successful interactions between humans and social robots, it is envisioned that the social robot should be viewed as an interaction partner rather than an inanimate thing. This implies that the robot should act autonomously, being able to ‘perceive’ and ‘anticipate’ the human’s actions as well as its own actions ‘here and now’. Two crucial aspects that affect the quality of social human-robot interaction is the social robot’s physical embodiment and its performed behaviors. In any interaction, before, during or after, there are certain expectations of what the social robot is capable of. The role of expectations is a key research topic in the field of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI); if a social robot does not meet the expectations during interaction, the human (user) may shift from viewing the robot as an interaction partner to an inanimate thing. The aim of this work is to unravel the role and relevance of humans’ expectations of social robots and why it is important area of study in HRI research. Moreover, I argue that the field of HRI can greatly benefit from incorporating approaches and methods from the field of User Experience (UX) in its efforts to gain a deeper understanding of human users’ expectations of social robots and making sure that the matching of these expectations and reality is better aligned.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dautenhahn, K.: Methodology & themes of human-robot interaction. Int. J. Adv. Rob. Syst. 4(1), 103–108 (2007)
Duffy, B.R.: Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robot. Auton. Syst. 42(3–4), 177–190 (2003)
Manzi, F., Massaro, D., Di Lernia, D., Maggioni, M., Riva, G., Marchetti, A.: Robots are not all the same. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Network. 24, 1–8 (2020)
Dennett, D.: The Intentional Stance. MIT press, Cambridge (1989)
Heider, F., Simmel, M.: An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am. J. Psychol. 57(2), 243–259 (1944)
Alač, M.: Social robots: things or agents? AI Soc. 31(4), 519–535 (2016)
Hartson, R., Pyla, P.S.: The UX Book. Morgan Kaufmann, San Diego (2018)
Borg Jr., M., Porter, L.: Following the life-course of an expectation. In: Leon, P., Tamez, N. (eds.) The Psychology of Expectations, pp. 1–47. Nova Science Publishers (2010)
Roese, N.J., Sherman, J.W.: Expectancy. In: Kruglanski, A.W., Higgins, E.T. (eds.) Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, pp. 91–115 (2007)
Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience — A research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)
Malle, B.F., Fischer, K., Young, J.E., Moon, A., Colling, E.: Trust and the Discrepancy Between Expectations and Actual Capabilities of Social Robots. Cambridge Scholars Publishing (2020)
Billing, E., Rosén, J., Lindblom, J.: Expectations of robot technology in welfare. In: The Second Workshop on Social Robots in Therapy and Care in Conjunction With the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2019), Daegu, Korea (2019)
Billing, E., et al.: The DREAM dataset. PLOS ONE 15(8), 1–15 (2020)
Riek, L.D.: Wizard of Oz studies in HRI. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 1(1), 119–136 (2012)
Huang, W.: When HCI Meets HRI. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (2015)
Lindblom, J., Alenljung, B., Billing, E.: Evaluating the user experience of human robot interaction. In: Jost, C., et al. (eds.) Evaluation Methods Standardization for Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 231–256 (2020)
Tonkin, M., Vitale, J., Herse, S., Williams, M.A., Judge, W., Wang, X.: Design methodology for the UX of HRI. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 407–415 (2018)
Wallström, J., Lindblom, J.: UX Evaluation of social robots with the USUS goals framework. In: Jost, C., et al. (eds.) Evaluation Methods Standardization for Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 177–201. Springer (2020)
Weiss, A., Bernhaupt, R., Schwaiger, D., Altmaninger, M., Buchner, R., Tscheligi, M.: User experience evaluation with a wizard of Oz approach. In: 2009 9th IEEE RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 303–308. IEEE (2009)
Sun, Y., Sundar, S.S.: Psychological importance of human agency how self-assembly affects user experience of robots. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 189–196. IEEE (2016)
Edwards, A., Edwards, C., Westerman, D., Spence, P.R.: Initial expectations, interactions, and beyond with social robots. Comput. Hum. Behav. 90, 308–314 (2019)
Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J.: Towards a feminist HCI methodology. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 675–684 (2011)
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my gratitude to Jessica Lindblom and Erik Billing for their valuable input and guidance for this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rosén, J. (2021). Expectations in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Ayaz, H., Asgher, U., Paletta, L. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80285-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80285-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80284-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80285-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)