Skip to main content

Sense of Agency in Human-Machine Interaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 259))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Although being in control is an important aspect of human-machine interaction, little is known about the combined effect of automation and mental workload on the sense of agency. In this study, participants were asked to reproduce the time interval between a keypress and an acoustic tone presented with different time delays (1250 to 2250 ms). Automation had three levels from the human being in complete control, an intermediate condition, to the machine being fully automatic. Mental workload was manipulated with a secondary memory task with two levels. Results showed a gradual loss of sense of agency with increasing automation intervention. Mental workload was found to affect only the intermediate automation condition. Further, we found an Intentional Binding effect for delays longer than 1750 ms in this intermediate condition. These findings demonstrate the existence of a residual sense of agency, which has important implications for the future design of hybrid, semi-autonomous systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Haggard, P., Chambon, V.: Sense of agency. Curr. Biol. 22, R390–R392 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeannerod, M.: The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behav. Brain Res. 142, 1–15 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chambon, V., Sidarus, N., Haggard, P.: From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 320 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haggard, P., Clark, S., Kalogeras, J.: Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 382–385 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore, J.W., Obhi, S.S.: Intentional binding and the sense of agency: a review. Conscious. Cogn. 21, 546–561 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berberian, B., Sarrazin, J.C., Le Blaye, P., Haggard, P.: Automation technology and sense of control: a window on human agency. PLoS ONE 7, e34075 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mulder, M., Abbink, D.A., Boer, E.R.: Sharing control with haptics: seamless driver support from manual to automatic control. Hum. Factors 54, 786–798 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yun, S., et al.: Investigating the relationship between assisted driver’s SoA and EEG. In: Masia, L., Micera, S., Akay, M., Pons, J.L. (eds.) ICNR 2018. BB, vol. 21, pp. 1039–1043. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01845-0_208

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. McEneaney, J.E.: Agency effects in human-computer interaction. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Int. 29, 798–813 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Obhi, S.S., Hall, P.: Sense of agency in joint action: influence of human and computer co-actors. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 663–670 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wohlschläger, A., Haggard, P., Gesierich, B., Prinz, W.: The perceived onset time of self and other-generated actions. Psychol. Sci. 14, 586–591 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A.: Keep the driver in control: automating automobiles of the future. Appl. Ergon. 53, 389–395 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reinartz, S., Gruppe, T.: Information requirements to support operator-automatic co-operation. In: Human Factors in Nuclear Safety Conference, pp. 22–23. IBC, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fan, J., Smith, A.P.: The impact of workload and fatigue on performance. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds.) H-WORKLOAD 2017. CCIS, vol. 726, pp. 90–105. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Young, M.S., Brookhuis, K.A., Wickens, C.D., Hancock, P.A.: State of science: mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics 58, 1–17 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O.: The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Hum. Factors 37, 381–394 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hon, N., Poh, J., Soon, C.S.: Preoccupied minds feel less control: sense of agency is modulated by cognitive load. Conscious. Cogn. 22, 556–561 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Howard, E.E., Edwards, S.G., Bayliss, A.P.: Physical and mental effort disrupts the implicit sense of agency. Cognition 157, 114–125 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Peirce, J., et al.: PsychoPy2: experiments in behavior made easy. Behav. Res. Methods 51, 195–203 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sternberg, S.: High-speed scanning in human memory. Science 153, 652–654 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van den Bussche, E., Alves, M., Murray, Y.P.J., Hughes, G.: The effect of cognitive effort on the sense of agency. PLoS ONE 15, 1–20 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Humphreys, G.R., Buehner, M.J.: Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 35, 1542 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wenke, D., Haggard, P.: How voluntary actions modulate time perception. Exp. Brain Res. 196, 311–318 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wen, W., Haggard, P.: Control changes the way we look at the world. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 30, 603–619 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bednark, J.G., Franz, E.A.: Agency attribution: event-related potentials and outcome monitoring. Exp. Br. Res. 232, 1117–1126 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eitam, B., Kennedy, P.M., Higgins, E.T.: Motivation from control. Exp. Br. Res. 229, 475–484 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson Education, India (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material was funded and delivered in partnership between the Thales Group and the University of Bristol, and with the support of the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Grant Award EP/R004757/1 entitled ‘Thales-Bristol Partnership in Hybrid Autonomous Systems Engineering (T-B PHASE)’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debora Zanatto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zanatto, D., Chattington, M., Noyes, J. (2021). Sense of Agency in Human-Machine Interaction. In: Ayaz, H., Asgher, U., Paletta, L. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80285-1_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80285-1_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80284-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80285-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics