Abstract
Every organization needs to use the experience and knowledge of its people to identify threats with a potential to cause adverse events, i.e. disruptions, and prepare appropriate contingency plans to address them. Doing so forms a basis of risk management. Any identifiable threats should be assigned to relevant risk categories. A response to emerging threats will be a test not only of an organization’s preparedness but also of its vigilance, speed of response and flexibility. The article discusses the essence of organizational risk, which it examines in relation to the custom production of highly complex products with particular focus on unscheduled times. All performance times outside of such schedules are referred to as “unscheduled” and are reported with a view to identifying their causes. The authors analyze historical data (from the year 2018) on reported unscheduled times and assign them to separate categories to identify their causes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Future communication systems “include vehicles that drive, maneuver and park autonomously, systems for shipment tracing and shopper behavior analytics, automatic picking for shipping points, smart power grids, remote medical diagnostics (e.g. to assess mental and physical condition of drivers), air conditioning systems notified in advance to adjust indoor conditions ahead of user arrival and a host of other smart solutions” [16].
- 2.
Organizational relationships are described in terms of tasks, authorizations and responsibilities [9].
- 3.
In the organization in question, unplanned times are used to identify differences between the planned and actual lead times.
References
Avunduk, Z.B., Kazan, H.: Üretim Teknolojisinde Yeni Eğilimler ve Endüstriyel Değişimler, Sosyal Bilimlerde Yeni Araştırmalar In: İslamoğlu, E., YpP, S. (eds.) Ankara (2019)
Ceruti, A., Marzoca, P., Liverani, A., Bil, C.: Maintenance in aeronautics in an Industry 4.0 context: The Role OF AR and AM. https://books.google.pl/books?id=bo1xDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA70&dq=industry+4.0&hl=pl&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiPy8bczdzuAhXSDewKHXYnALAQ6AEwAHoECAAQAg#v=onepage&q=industry%204.0&f=false
Hozdić, E.: Smart factory for Industry 4.0: a review. Int. J. Mod. Manuf. Technol. ISSN 2067–3604, VII(1) (2015)
Kawecka-Endler, A.: Organizacja technicznego przygotowania produkcji- prac rozwojowych, Wyd.Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań (2004)
Lis, S. (red.): Rytmiczność procesu produkcyjnego. Zakłócenia i ich kompensacja, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa (1982)
Mrugalska, B., Stasiuk-Piekarska, A.: Readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises for Industry 4.0. In: Mrugalska, B., Trzcielinski, S., Karwowski, W., Di Nicolantonio, M., Rossi, E. (eds.) AHFE 2020. AISC, vol. 1216, pp. 263–270. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51981-0_33
Oks, S.J., Fritzsche, A., Lehmann, C.: The digitalisation of industry from a strategic perspective. In: R&D Management Conference 2016 “From Science to Society: Innovation and Value Creation”, 3–6 July 2016, Cambridge, UK (2016)
Oláh, J., Aburumman, N., Popp, J., Asif Khan, M, Hassad, H., Kitukutha, N.: Impact of Industry 4.0 on environmental sustainability. Sustainability, 12(11), 4674 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114674. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4674/htm
REFA, Moduł 3210364: Ustalanie wymagań (1997)
Report PwC: Oswoić ryzyko. Jak odporna jest Twoja firma? grudzień (2016). https://www.pwc.pl/pl/pdf/oswoic-ryzyko-raport-2016-pwc.pdf
Rzeszotarska-Wyrwicka, M.: Organizowanie systemów pracy. Materiały pomocnicze, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań (1998)
Stasiuk-Piekarska, A.: Innowacyjne wykorzystanie założeń metody FMEA dla potrzeb zarządzania ryzykiem organizacyjnym w systemach produkcyjnych, Problemy Jakości, 6, Wyd. Sigma-NOT, pp. 26–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.15199/48.2017.6.4
Stasiuk-Piekarska, A., Wyrwicka, M., Hadaś, Ł.: Ryzyko organizacyjne w produkcji, Wyd. Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań (2020)
Urbaniak, M.: Wykorzystanie koncepcji zarządzania ryzykiem w doskonaleniu systemów zarządzania jakości. Problemy Jakości 48(6), 11–16 (2016)
Wallis, A.: Rola informacji i wiedzy w zarządzaniu ryzykiem ekonomicznym w przedsiębiorstwie. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Częstochowskiej Zarządzanie, 24(2), 27–37 (2016)
Wyrwicka, M.: Rewolucja czy ewolucja w logistyce? Logistyka 3, 9–11 (2014)
Zawadzki, P., Żywicki, K.: Smart product design and production control for effective mass customization in the Industry 4.0 concept. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 7(3), 105–112 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/mper-2016-0030. https://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/121910/edition/106257/content/
Acknowledgments
This study has been financed by funds received to support the statutory activities of “DS Młoda Kadra” of the Faculty of Management Engineering of the Poznań University of Technology (No. 503/227/11/141/DSMK/0578). The article has been financed by the Research Projects fund of the Faculty of Management Engineering (No. 0811/SBAD/1016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stasiuk-Piekarska, A.K., Wyrwicka, M.K. (2021). Organizational Risk in Custom Manufacturing of Complex Products. In: Trzcielinski, S., Mrugalska, B., Karwowski, W., Rossi, E., Di Nicolantonio, M. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 274. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80462-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80462-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80461-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80462-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)