Abstract
This article aims to present how manage the team using Individualised Management to support efficient achievement of specific business objectives. An individualised approach to employees and the whole concept of Individualised Management works for individual employees, hence the approach has been expanded to incorporate entire teams. An IT tool i.e., an application that uses AI has been developed to enable individualised management and support managers in analysing the internal needs of employees and teams, and in using this knowledge to effectively manage their teams. Knowledge from various fields was used to develop the tool: Artificial Intelligence (AI) as well as psychology of management and needs.
The tool presented here provides managers with recommendations on how to manage teams, thus supporting organisations in fast and effective achievement of business objectives through an individualised approach and utilising state-of-the-art information technology. The IT solution operates on the basis of proprietary algorithms and models developed during research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chen, G., Kanfer, R.: Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Res. Organ. Behav. 27, 223–267 (2006)
Chen, G., Thomas, B., Wallace, J.C.: A multilevel examination of the relationships among training outcomes, mediating regulatory processes, and adaptive performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 90, 827–841 (2005)
DeShon, R.P., Kozlowski, S.W.J., Schmidt, A.M., Milner, K.R., Wiechman, D.: A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 89, 1035–1056 (2004)
Kristof, A.L.: Person-organization fit: an integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Pers. Psychol. 49, 1–49 (1996)
Asendorpf, J.B., Wilpers, S.: Personality effects on social relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74, 1531–1544 (1998)
Overtveit, J.: Making the team work. Prof. Nurse 5, 284–288 (1990)
Freeman, C.M., Nick Ross, M.: The impact of individual philosophies of teamwork on multi-professional practice and the implications for education. J. Interprof. Care 14(3), 237–247 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/jic.14.3.237.247
Kellett, J., Humphrey, R., Sleeth, R.: Empathy and the emergence of task and relations leaders. Leadersh. Q. 17, 146–162 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.12.003
Tasa, K., Taggar, S., Seijts, G.H.: The development of collective efficacy in teams: a multilevel and longitudinal perspective. J. Appl. Psychol. 92, 17–27 (2007)
Sawyer, S.: Software development teams. Commun. ACM 47(12), 95–99 (2004)
Walz, D.B., Elam, J.J., Curtis, B.: Inside a software design team: knowledge acquisition, sharing, and integration. Commun. ACM 36(10), 63–77 (1993)
Reus, T.H., Liu, Y.: Rhyme and reason: emotional capability and the performance of knowledge-intensive work groups. Hum. Perform. 17, 245–266 (2004)
Brodbeck, F.C.: Communication and performance in software development projects. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psy. 10, 73–94 (2001)
Franz, T.M., Larson, J.R.J.: The impact of experts on information sharing during group discussion. Small Group Res. 33, 383–411 (2002)
Brown, R.W.: Autorating: getting individual marks from team marks and enhancing teamwork. In: Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century (n.d). https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.1995.483140
Sonnentag, S.: High performance and meeting participation. An observational study in software design teams. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 5, 3–18 (2001)
Christianson, D.: New Cumcula, SpectralLines. In: IEEE Spectrum, vol. 29, no 7 (1992)
Agrawal, V.: Managing the diversified team: challenges and strategies for improving performance. Team Perform. Manag.: Int. J. 18(7/8), 384–400 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591211281129
Evans, C.R., Dion, K.L.: Group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. Small Group Res. 43, 690–701 (2012)
Carron, A.V., Bray, S.R., Eys, M.A.: Team cohesion and team success in sport. J. Sports Sci. 20, 119–126 (2002)
Dion, K.L.: Group cohesion: from “field of forces” to multidimensional construct. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 4, 7–26 (2000)
Severt, J.B., Estrada, A.X.: On the function and structure of group cohesion. In: Salas, E., Vessey, W.B., Estrada, A.X. (eds.) Team Cohesion: Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice, pp. 3–24. Emerald Group publishing limited, West Yorkshire (2015)
Wickramasinghe, V., Nandula, S.: Diversity in team composition, relationship conflict and team leader support on globally distributed virtual software development team performance. Strateg. Outsourcing: Int. J. 8(2/3), 138–155 (2015)
Horwitz, S.K., Horwitz, I.B.: The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: a meta-analytic review of team demography. J. Manag. 33(6), 987–1015 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308587
Miron-Spector, E., Erez, M., Naveh, E.: To drive creativity add some conformity. Harvard Bus. Rev. 90, 30 (2012)
Hinds, P.J., Bailey, D.E.: Out of sight, out of sync: understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. 14(6), 615–632 (2003)
Oertig, M., Buergi, T.: The challenges of managing cross-cultural virtual project teams. Team Perform. Manag.: Int. J. 12(1/2), 23–30 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590610652774
Vakola, M., Wilson, I.E.: The challenge of virtual organisations: critical success factors in dealing with constant change. Team Perform. Manag. 10(5/6), 112–120 (2004)
Byrne, D.: An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 14, 417–431 (1997)
Flake, J., Fried, E.: Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them (2019). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hs7wm
Barry, A.E., Chaney, B., Piazza-Gardner, A.K., Chavarria, E.A.: Validity and reliability reporting practices in the field of health education and behavior. Health Educ. Behav. 41(1), 12–18 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198113483139
Santor, D.A., Gregus, M., Welch, A.: Eight decades of measurement in depression. Measurement 4, 135–155 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0403_1
Weidman, A.C., Steckler, C.M., Tracy, J.L.: The jingle and jangle of emotion assessment: imprecise measurement, casual scale usage, and conceptual fuzziness in emotion research. Emotion 17, 267–295 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000226
Bradshaw, J.D., et al.: Roles for agent technology in knowledge management: examples from applications in aerospace and medicine, White Paper, Boeing Information and Support Services, Seattle, WA (1998)
Hendriks, P., Vriens, D.: Knowledge-based systems and knowledge management: friends or foes? Inf. Manag. 35, 113–125 (1999)
Bell, S.T., Outland, N.: Team composition over time. In: Team Dynamics Over Time, vol. 18, pp. 3–27. Emerald Publishing Limited, UK (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jochheim, E., Orzechowski, M., Nowodzinski, P. (2021). Managing the Team by Individualization. How Can Artificial Intelligence Help to Manage a Team Effectively and Increase Its Efficiency?. In: Trzcielinski, S., Mrugalska, B., Karwowski, W., Rossi, E., Di Nicolantonio, M. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 274. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80462-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80462-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80461-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80462-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)