Skip to main content

Printing Small: Measuring the Resolution Limits of CLIP Technology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 274))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1701 Accesses

Abstract

This study seeks to understand the impact of process variables, especially UV light distribution, on the 3D fabrication of micro features at the optical resolution scale. In CLIP 3D technology, a Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) is used to create a pattern of projected UV light by controlling each pixel independently. However, as the light outputs of the projected pixels are partially overlapping, there are challenges in obtaining the targeted size and shape of microscale features. From our study, 1. the applied exposure has a direct effect on the size of small printed positive features; 2. smaller sized negative features are even more sensitive and require a careful tuning of the applied exposure to successfully print desired fine structures. Overall, the applied exposure, particularly the UV dosage is critical in the accurate fabrication of micro features that incorporate negative and positive features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wang, B.: The future of manufacturing: a new perspective. Engineering 4, 722–728 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ngo, T.D., Kashani, A., Nguyen, K.T.Q., Hui, D.: Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Com. Part B: Eng. 143, 172–196 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yan, Q., Dong, H., Su, J., Song, B., Wei, Q., Shi, Y.: A review of 3D printing technology for Medical applications. Engineering 4, 729–742 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertsch, A., Jezequel, J.Y., Andre, J.C.: Study of the spatial resolution of a new 3D microfabrication process: the microstereo photolithography using a dynamic mask-generator technique. J. Photoch. Photobio. A 107, 275–281 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi, J.W., Ha, Y.M., Lee, S.H., Choi, K.H.: Design of Microstereolithography system based on dynamic image projection for fabrication of three-dimensional microstructures. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 20(12), 2094–2104 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02916326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Han, D., Yang, C., Fang, N.X., Lee, H.: Rapid multi-material 3D printing with projection micro-stereolithography using dynamic fluidic control. Addit. Manuf. 27, 606–615 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sun, C., Fang, N., Wu, D.M., Zhang, X.: Projection micro-stereolithography using digital micro-mirror dynamic mask. Sens. Actuators A: Phys. 121(1), 113–120 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2004.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, X., Jiang, X.N., Sun, C.: Micro-stereolithography of polymeric and ceramic microstructures. Sens. Actuators A: Phys. 77(2), 149–156 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(99)00189-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi, J.S., Kang, H.W., Lee, I.H., Ko, T.J., Cho, D.W.: Development of micro-stereolithography technology using a UV lamp and optical fiber. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 41, 281–286 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, G., Zhao, W., Tang, Y., Lu, B.: Novel stereolithography system for small size objects. Rapid Prototype J. 12, 12–17 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tumbleston, J.R., et al.: Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science 347, 1349–1352 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Caudill, C.L., Perry, J.L., Tian, S., Luft, J.C., DeSimone, J.M.: Spatially controlled coating of continuous liquid interface production microneedles for transdermal protein delivery. J. Controlled Release 284, 122–132 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson, A., et al.: Single-step fabrication of computationally designed microneedles by continuous liquid interface production. PLOS ONE 11(9), e0162518 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162518

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Addis Tessema .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tessema, A., Mecham, J., Iliadis, K., Mecham, S.J., Pinschmidt, R., DeSimone, J.M. (2021). Printing Small: Measuring the Resolution Limits of CLIP Technology. In: Trzcielinski, S., Mrugalska, B., Karwowski, W., Rossi, E., Di Nicolantonio, M. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 274. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80462-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80462-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80461-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80462-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics