Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control (AHFE 2021)

Abstract

Rapid prototyping and 3D printing technologies have been innovative options for orthotic development, that are assistive devices applied to any part of the body to different disabilities or injuries. The aim of the study was to investigate scientific evidence about the effectiveness of using 3D printed orthoses in relation to conventional orthoses, through a systematic literature review in the years 2010 to 2020. Scientific evidence identifies that there are improvements associated with the development and use of rapid prototyped and 3D printed orthoses however the publications found present were small in sample sizes and lack comprehensive end-user evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). World Report on Disability (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sandnes, F.E., Medola, F.O., Berg, A., Rodrigues, O.V., Mirtaheri, P., Gjøvaag, T.: Solving the grand challenges together: a Brazil-Norway approach to teaching collaborative design and prototyping of assistive technologies and products for independent living. The Design Society. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Medola, F.O., Sandnes, F.E., Silva, S.R.M., Rodrigues, A.C.T.: Improving assistive technology in practice: contributions from interdisciplinary research and development and collaboration. Assistive Technol. Outcomes Benefits 12(1), 1–10 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Medola, F.O., Sandnes, F.E., Rodrigues, A.C.T., Paschoarelli, L.C., Silva, L.M.: Rehabilitation and product design: towards the inclusion of people with disabilities through interdisciplinary collaboration. In: Machado, J., Soares, F., Veiga, G. (eds.) HELIX 2018. LNEE, vol. 505, pp. 185–191. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91334-6_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferrari, A.L.M., Medola, F.O., Sandnes, F.E.: How do orthoses impact ease of donning, handwriting, typewriting, and transmission of manual torque? A study of three prefabricated wrist-hand orthoses. J. Prosthet. Orthot. (2020, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deshaies, L.D.: Upper extremity orthoses. In: Trombly, C.A., Radomski, M.V. (Org.) Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction, 6th edn, pp. 421–464. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rodrigues Jr., J.L.: Claw hand: a proposal of Occupational Therapy Intervention for leprosys. Master’s dissertation. Federal University of Pará. Post Graduate Programme in Tropical Diseases (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edelstein, J.E., Bruckner, J.: Introduction to orthotics. In: Edelstein, J.E., Bruckner, J. (eds.) Orthotics: A Comprehensive Clinical Approach, vol. 1, pp. 1–16. SLACK Incorporated (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martinez, L.B.A., Elui, V.M.C., Martinez, R.A., Agnelli, J.A.M.: Elaboration of standard instrument for the test of thermoplastic materials for orthoses. Rev. Interinst. Bras. Ter. Ocup. Suppl. 1(4), 518–525 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cha, Y.H., et al.: Ankle-foot orthosis made by 3D printing technique and automated design software. Appl. Bionics Biomech. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. da Silva, L., Medola, F., Rodrigues, O., Rodrigues, A., Sandnes, F.: Interdisciplinary-based development of user-friendly customized 3D printed upper limb prosthesis. In: Ahram, T.Z., Falcão, C. (eds.) AHFE 2018. AISC, vol. 794, pp. 899–908. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_88

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, K.H., Kim, D.K., Cha, Y.H., Kwon, J.Y., Kim, D.H., Kim, S.J.: Personalized assistive device manufactured by 3D modelling and printing techniques. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 14(5), 526–531 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mo, S., et al.: The biomechanical difference between running with traditional and 3D printed orthoses. J. Sports Sci. 37(19), 2191–2197 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeng, T., Gao, D.W., Wu, Y.F., Chen, L., Zhang, H.T.: Small splint external fixation combined with 3D printing brace for the treatment of Colles fractures. Zhongguo gu shang = China J. Orthop. Traumatol. 32(6), 513–518 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, R., Wang, Z., Ma, T., Ren, Z., Jin, H.: Effect of 3D printing individualized ankle-foot orthosis on plantar biomechanics and pain in patients with plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. Med. Sci0 Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 25, 1392–1400 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng, Y., et al.: Effects of a 3D-printed orthosis compared to a low-temperature thermoplastic plate orthosis on wrist flexor spasticity in chronic hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 34(2), 194–204 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, S.J., Kim, S.J., Cha, Y.H., Lee, K.H., Kwon, J.Y.: Effect of personalized wrist orthosis for wrist pain with three-dimensional scanning and printing technique: a preliminary, randomized, controlled, open-label study. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 42(6), 636–643 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cazon, A., Kelly, S., Paterson, A., Bibb, R., Ian Campbell, R.: Analysis and comparison of wrist splint designs using the finite element method: multi-material three-dimensional printing compared to typical existing practice with thermoplastics. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H: J. Eng. Med. 231(9), 881–897 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411917718221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Banga, H., Belokar, R., Kalra, P., Kumar, R.: Fabrication and stress analysis of ankle foot orthosis with additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping J. 24(2), 301–312 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mavroidis, C., et al.: Patient specific ankle-foot orthoses using rapid prototyping. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 8(1) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Cláudia Tavares Rodrigues .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rodrigues, A.C.T., Garcez, L.V.M., Medola, F.O., Baleotti, L.R., Sandnes, F.E., Vaezipour, A. (2021). A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses. In: Trzcielinski, S., Mrugalska, B., Karwowski, W., Rossi, E., Di Nicolantonio, M. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 274. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80462-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80462-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80461-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80462-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics