Skip to main content

Improving the Patient Room: Lessons from Acuity Adaptable Room

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare and Medical Devices (AHFE 2021)

Abstract

A growing trend in healthcare is the notion of Acuity-Adaptable care /Universal Care patient room that is compelling hospitals to abandon the traditional approach to care where patients are transferred from unit to unit in search of the proper level of care with negative effects on healthcare quality. This paper reviews key design elements that support the success of an Acuity-Adaptable care /Universal care patient room, in particular, focusing on design solutions that attempt to adapt the patient room to the pathology level through the position of the ‘life support system’; balancing technological complexities with the human dimension; improving the organization of the staff’ work through the decentralization nurse stations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hendrich, A.L., Fay, J., Sorrells, A.K.: Effects of acuity-adaptable rooms on flow of patients and delivery of care. Am. J. Crit. Care 13(1), 35–45 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hendrich, A.L., Lee, N.: Intra-unit patient trasnports: time, motion, and cost impact on hospital efficiency. Nurs. Econ. 23(4), 157–164 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eveillard, M., Quenon, J.-L., Rufat, P., Mangeol, A., Fauvelle, F.: Association between hospital-acquired infections and patients’ transfers. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 22(11), 693–696 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Szem, J.W., Hydo, L.J., Fischer, E., Kapur, S., Klemperer, J., Barie, P.S.: High-risk intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: safety and outcome of the necessary “road trip.” Crit. Care Med. 23(10), 1660–1666 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor, J.O., Landers, C.F., Chulay, J.D., Hood, W.B., Abelmann, W.H.: Monitoring high-risk cardiac patients during transportation in hospital. Lancet 2, 1205–1208 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, K.K., Gallant, D.: Impacting patient outcomes through design: acuity adaptable care/universal room design. Crit. Care Q. 29(4), 326–341 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ulrich, R., Zhu, X.: Medical complications of intra-hospital patient transports: implications for architectural design and research. Health Environ. Res. Des. J. 1(1), 31–43 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hurst, J.M., Davis, K., Johnson, D.J., Branson, R.D., Campbell, R.S., Branson, P.S.: Cost and complications during in hospital transport of critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study. J. Trauma 33(4), 582–585 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, K.K.: The universal bed care delivery model, facility design and operations combine to impact the patient experience. In: Patient Safety & Quality Healthcare (2007). http://psqh.com/marapr07/caredelivery.html

  10. Hendrich, A.: Case study: the impact of acuity adaptable rooms on future designs, bottlenecks and hospital capacity. In: Impact Conference on Optimizing the Physical Space for Improved Outcomes, Satisfaction and the Bottom Line, Atlanta, Georgia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gallant, D.: Streamlining patient care processes through flexible room and equipment design. Crit. Care Nurs. Q. 24(3), 59–76 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pati, D., Evans, J., Waggener, L., Harvey, T.: An exploratory examination of medical gas booms versus traditional headwalls in intensive care unit design. Crit. Care Nurses Q. 31(4), 340–356 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamilton, D.K., Ulrich, R.S.: Evidence-based design of the cardiothoracic critical care. In: Klein, A., Vuylsteke, A., Nashef, S.A.M. (eds.) Core topics in cardiothoracic critical care, pp. 468–474. Cambridge University Press, England (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Needham, D.M., Sinopoli, D.J., Thompson, D.A., et al.: A system factors analysis of line, tube and drain incidents in the intensive care unit. Crit. Care Med. 33(8), 1701–1707 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobs Medical Center in San Diego. http://www.cannondesign.com/

  16. Breslow, M.J., et al.: Effect of a multiple-site intensive care unit telemedicine program on clinical and economic outcomes: an alternative paradigm for intensivist staffing. Crit. Care Med. 32(1), 31–38 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas, E.J., et al.: Association of telemedicine for remote monitoring of intensive care patients with mortality, complications, and length of stay. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 302, 2671–2678 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrante, T.: Valutare la qualità percepita. Uno studio pilota per gli hospice, Evaluation of perceived quality. Hospice: a pilot study. FrancoAngeli, Milano (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ferrante, T.: EBD&EBM: qualità degli spazi & qualità delle cure. In: Ergonomia, no. 15 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harris, D., et al.: The impact of single family room design on patients and caregivers: executive summary. J. Perinatol. 26(3), 38–48 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pati, D., Harvey, T., Thurston, T.: Estimating design impact on waste reduction: examining decentralized nursing. J. Nurs. Adm. 42(11), 513–518 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gurascio-Howard, L., Malloch, K.: Centralized and decentralized nurse station design: an examination of caregiver communication, work activities, and technology. Health Environ. Res. Des. J. 1, 44–57 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zborowsky, T., et al.: Centralized vs. decentralized nursing stations: effects on nurses’ functional use of space and work environment. Health Environ. Res. Des. J. 3, 19–42 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kobus, R.L., Russ W.: Designing for Safety. In: Healthcare Design (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Cristiana Cellucci; Supervision, Validation, Tiziana Ferrante. Writing—original draft, Cristiana Cellucci; Writing—review & editing, Tiziana Ferrante, Cristiana Cellucci.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristiana Cellucci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ferrante, T., Cellucci, C. (2021). Improving the Patient Room: Lessons from Acuity Adaptable Room. In: Kalra, J., Lightner, N.J., Taiar, R. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare and Medical Devices. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 263. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80744-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80744-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80743-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80744-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics