Skip to main content

Virtual Critical Care Unit (VCCU): A Powerful Simulator for e-Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Computing (SAI 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 506))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Overview. Learning clinical skills in nursing is challenging for students and teachers, especially because several security and safety issues could affect the patient in real-live situations. Between learning a theoretical content and practice in the real-life, it appears very important to have concrete meaning of practice and make errors without consequences for others. Hight-fidelity simulation could be useful, but it’s expensive for faculties. However, the benefits of simulation are well documented, particularly about decision making and critical thinking (Cant and Cooper 2010; Harder 2010; Rhodes and Curran 2005), managing patient instability (Cooper et al. 2012), developing leadership and teamwork and improving performance and technical skills. In literature, Virtual reality (VR) could be an acceptable safe alternative and at a relatively low-cost. This technology is now known to be useful for the development of clinical skills such as assessment, intervention, or rehabilitation. Through its ecological approach (their ability to reproduce real life with a good similarity), it constitutes an excellent educational strategy by reducing artificial conditions found in conventional laboratories. Aim: In this paper, we describe an experimentation of the VCCU functionality according to four variables: sense of presence, cybersickness, usability and user experience (UX). Method: In a multiple case-study design, we assessed four participants to explore the feasibility in education for this type of learning. In a 30 min session, participants were immersing in a virtual environment representing an intensive care unit (ICU). They had to practice clinical surveillance process and made adequate nursing interventions. Results: After the experimentation, we observed that the sense of presence was high and cybersickness very low. However, the mental load associated to the task AND the Human-Machin Interface was very high. A qualitative analysis shown that the usability and UX had an impact directly on the learning processes. Discussion: Finally, we will discuss the importance to consider the impact of interfaces on the cognitive functions that impact directly learning capacities according to the perspective of Cognitive Load Theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. OIIQ: Portrait national de l’effectif infirmier 2019–2020 (2020). https://www.oiiq.org/portrait-national-de-l-effectif-infirmier-2019-2020

  2. Cant, R.P., Cooper, S.J.: Simulation-based learning in nurse education: systematic review. J. Adv. Nurs. 66(1), 3–15 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harder, B.N.: Use of simulation in teaching and learning in health sciences: a systematic review. J. Nurs. Educ. 49(1), 23–28 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rhodes, M.L., Curran, C.: Use of the human patient simulator to teach clinical judgment skills in a baccalaureate nursing program. CIN Comput. Inform. Nurs. 23(5), 256–262 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, S., et al.: Managing patient deterioration: a protocol for enhancing undergraduate nursing students’ competence through web-based simulation and feedback techniques. BMC Nurs. 11(1), 18 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Endacott, R., et al.: Leadership and teamwork in medical emergencies: performance of nursing students and registered nurses in simulated patient scenarios. J. Clin. Nurs. 24(1–2), 90–100 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alinier, G., Hunt, B., Gordon, R., Harwood, C.: Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. J. Adv. Nurs. 54(3), 359–369 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Milhomme, D.: Processus de surveillance clinique par des infirmières expertes en contexte de soins critiques: une explication théorique. Thèse de doctorat pour l’obtention du grade de Philosophiae doctor, Ph.D., Université Laval, Québec (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Milhomme, D., Gagnon, J., Lechasseur, K.: The clinical surveillance process as carried out by expert nurses in a critical care context: a theoretical explanation. Intensive Crit. Care Nurs. 44, 24–30 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bracq, M.-S., et al.: Learning procedural skills with a virtual reality simulator: an acceptability study. Nurse Educ. Today 79, 153–160 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Butt, A.L., Kardong-Edgren, S., Ellertson, A.: Using game-based virtual reality with haptics for skill acquisition. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 16, 25–32 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chitongo, S., Suthers, F.: Use of technology in simulation training in midwifery. Br. J. Midwifery 27(2), 85–89 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. dit Gautier, E.J., Bot-Robin, V., Libessart, A., Doucède, G., Cosson, M., Rubod, C.: Design of a serious game for handling obstetrical emergencies. JMIR Serious Games 4(2), e21 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Verkuyl, M., Romaniuk, D., Atack, L., Mastrilli, P.: Virtual gaming simulation for nursing education: an experiment. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 13(5), 238–244 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Verkuyl, M., et al.: Virtual gaming simulation: exploring self, virtual and in-person debriefing. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 20, 7–14 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dickey, M.D.: Engaging by design: how engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 53(2), 67–83 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiemeyer, J., Nacke, L., Moser, C., ‘Floyd’ Mueller, F.: Player experience. In: Dörner, R., Göbel, S., Effelsberg, W., Wiemeyer, J. (eds.) Serious Games, pp. 243–271. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40612-1_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Calvillo-Gámez, E.H., Cairns, P., Cox, A.L.: Assessing the core elements of the gaming experience. In: Bernhaupt, R. (ed.) Game User Experience Evaluation. HCIS, pp. 37–62. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15985-0_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School Engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74(1), 59–109 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Coates, H.: A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 32(2), 121–141 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bryson, C., Hand, L.: The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 44(4), 349–362 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Srikanthan, G., Dalrymple, J.F.: A conceptual overview of a holistic model for quality in higher education. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 21(3), 173–193 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tcha-Tokey, K., Christmann, O., Loup-Escande, E., Loup, G., Richir, S.: Towards a model of user experience in immersive virtual environments. In: Advances in Human-Computer Interaction (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sweetser, P., Wyeth, P.: GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Comput. Entertainment (CIE) 3(3), 3 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sánchez, J.L.G., Vela, F.L.G., Simarro, F.M., Padilla-Zea, N.: Playability: analysing user experience in video games. Behav. Inf. Technol. 31(10), 1033–1054 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jackson, S.A., Marsh, H.: Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 18(1), 17–35 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Claxton, G.: Expanding young people’s capacity to learn. Br. J. Educ. Stud. 55(2), 1–20 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Alexandre, M.: La rigueur scientifique du dispositive méthodologique d’une étude de cas multiple. Rech. Qualitatives 32(1), 26–56 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3, 203–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schubert, T., Friedman, F., Regenbrecht, H.: Decomposing the sense of presence: factor analytic insights. In: Extended Abstract to the 2nd International Workshop on Presence, pp. 1–5 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Federoff, M.: Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of fun in video game. Thesis, Indiana University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bouchard, S., St-Jacques, J., Robillard, G., Renaud, P.: Anxiety increases the feeling of presence in virtual reality. Presence Teleop. Virt. 17(4), 376–391 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Banville, F., Nolin, P., Rosinvil, T., Verhulst, E., Allain, P.: Assessment and rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury using virtual reality: a systematic review and discussion concerning human-computer interactions. In: Rizzo, A., Bouchard, S. (eds) Virtual Reality for Psychological and Neurocognitive Interventions, pp. 327–360. Springer, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9482-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Rhiu, I., Min Kim, Y., Kim, W., Hwan Yun, M.: The evaluation of user experience of a human walking and a driving simulation in the virtual reality. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 79, 1–12 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederic Banville .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Banville, F., Parent, AA., Trepanier, M., Milhomme, D. (2022). Virtual Critical Care Unit (VCCU): A Powerful Simulator for e-Learning. In: Arai, K. (eds) Intelligent Computing. SAI 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 506. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10461-9_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics