Abstract
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is a widely used technology in the United States of America for measuring pavement layer thickness. GPR consists of an antenna that produces short duration electromagnetic pulses that penetrate pavement materials. The radar pulses are reflected at interfaces where the dielectric constants of material layers change. The reflected amplitude depends on the change in dielectric constant, while the arrival time of a reflected wave at a detector also depends on the depth at which the discontinuity is encountered. Layer material’s dielectric property is used for pulse velocity and thickness calculation. Most of the GPR software performs the pulse velocity calculation using surface reflection method, where dielectric constant is assumed to be 4.0 for unbound materials, which may not be field representative. Simply, field moisture content may vary at different months over a year, which may lead to variations in the dielectric constant of an unbound layer. This study examines whether the default dielectric value, which is a common practice in USA, should be used for determining thickness of an unbound layer. In this study, using a percometer, the dielectric constant of an unbound layer material collected from an instrumented pavement section at the Interstate I-40, near Rio Puerco, New Mexico (milepost 141) was measured. GPR tests were conducted at the same instrumented section using 400 MHz and 900 MHz antennas. From analysis, it is observed that laboratory measured dielectric constant resulted in an accurate determination of layer thickness. Additional GPR and percometer tests were conducted on two other pavements: US 54 and US 285. Results confirmed that the accuracy level of the unbound layer thickness prediction drops significantly if the default dielectric constant value of 4.0 is used, as opposed to actual values. It is therefore recommended to use actual/measured dielectric constant values to determine unbound layer thickness using GPR technology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Saarenketo, T., Scullion, T.: Road evaluation with ground penetrating radar. J. Geophys. 43, 119–138 (2000)
Maser, K.R.: Use of Ground-Penetrating Radar data for rehabilitation of composite pavements on high-volume roads. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 1808, 122–128 (2002)
Al-Qadi, I.L., Lahouar, S.: Ground penetrating radar: state of the practice for pavement assessment. Mater. Eval. Am. Soc. Nondestr. Test. 62(7), 759–763 (2004)
Ahmed, M.U., Tarefder, R.A., Maji, A.K.: Variation of FWD modulus due to incorporation of GPR predicted layer thicknesses. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Brussels, Belgium, June 30–July 4 (2014)
Willet, D.A., Rister, B.: Ground penetrating radar: pavement layer thickness evaluation. Research report: KTC-02-29/FR101-00-1F, Kentucky Department of Transportation (2002)
Geopghysical Survey Sytem Inc. (GSSI), RADAN7: Manual for software (2014)
ASTM D1557-12. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort. American Standard for Testing and Material, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959 (2012)
Acknowledgments
This study is funded by the New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT). The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude and appreciations to the Project Technical Panel Members, Project Advocate (Jeff Mann) and the Project Manager (Virgil Valdez) of NMDOT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tarefder, R.A., Ahmed, M.U. (2018). Ground Penetrating Radar for Measuring Thickness of an Unbound Layer of a Pavement. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W. (eds) Advances in Human Factors, Software, and Systems Engineering. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 598. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60011-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60011-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60010-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60011-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)