Skip to main content

Anatomy Builder VR: Applying a Constructive Learning Method in the Virtual Reality Canine Skeletal System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences (AHFE 2017)

Abstract

We present Anatomy Builder VR that examines how a virtual reality (VR) system can support embodied learning in anatomy education. The backbone of the project is to pursue an alternative constructivist pedagogical model for learning canine anatomy. The main focus of the study was to identify and assemble bones in the live-animal orientation, using real thoracic limb bones in a bone box and digital pelvic limb bones in the Anatomy Builder VR. Eleven college students participated in the study. The pilot study showed that participants most enjoyed interacting with anatomical contents within the VR program. Participants spent less time assembling bones in the VR, and instead spent a longer time tuning the orientation of each VR bone in the 3D space. This study showed how a constructivist method could support anatomy education while using virtual reality technology in an active and experiential way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Winkelmann, A., Hendrix, S., Kiessling, C.: What do students actually do during a dissection course? First steps towards understanding a complex learning experience. Acad. Med. 82, 989–995 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, R.: Approaches to learning spatial relationships in gross anatomy: perspective from wider principles of learning. Clin. Anat. 13(6), 439–443 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Parikh, M., et al.: Three dimensional virtual reality model of the normal female pelvic floor. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32, 292–296 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Temkin, B., et al.: An interactive three-dimensional virtual body structures system for anatomical training over the internet. Clin. Anat. 19, 267–274 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pedersen, K.: Supporting students with varied spatial reasoning abilities in the anatomy classroom. Teach. Innov. Proj. 2(1), 1–6 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Skinder-Meredith Smith, C.F., Mathias, H.S.: What impact does anatomy education have on clinical practice? Clin. Anat. 24(1), 113–119 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, J., et al.: Maximizing modern distribution of complex anatomical spatial information: 3D reconstruction and rapid prototype production of anatomical corrosion casts of human specimens. Anat. Sci. Educ. 5, 330–339 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rose, A., et al.: Multi-material 3D models for temporal bone surgical simulation. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 124(7), 528–536 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Myers, D.L., et al.: Pelvic anatomy for obstetrics and gynecology residents: an experimental study using clay models. Obstet. Gynecol. 97(2), 321–324 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Waters, J.R., et al.: Human clay models versus cat dissection: how the similarity between the classroom and the exam affects student performance. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 35(2), 227–236 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mota, M., Mata, F., Aversi-Ferreira, T.: Constructivist pedagogic method used in the teaching of human anatomy. Int. J. Morphol. 28(2), 369–374 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, J., et al.: Maximizing modern distribution of complex anatomical spatial information: 3D reconstruction and rapid prototype production of anatomical corrosion casts of human specimens. Anat. Sci. Educ. 5, 330–339 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rose, A., et al.: Multi-material 3D models for temporal bone surgical simulation. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 124(7), 528–536 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Myers, D.L., et al.: Pelvic anatomy for obstetrics and gynecology residents: an experimental study using clay models. Obstet. Gynecol. 97(2), 321–324 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Waters, J.R., et al.: Human clay models versus cat dissection: how the similarity between the classroom and the exam affects student performance. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 35(2), 227–236 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Texas A&M TOP program, Department of Visualization and Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinsil Hwaryoung Seo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Seo, J.H. et al. (2018). Anatomy Builder VR: Applying a Constructive Learning Method in the Virtual Reality Canine Skeletal System. In: Andre, T. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 596. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60018-5_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60018-5_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60017-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60018-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics