Skip to main content

Group Characteristics and Task Accuracy in Distributed Remote User Controlled Manufacturing as Collaborative Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 592))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3377 Accesses

Abstract

Collaborative environments today are very successful when used in multiplayer games and for meetings organizing, which gives an idea to explore its potentials in remotely controlled decentralized manufacturing. This survey is based on the experiment that involved 34 small collaborative groups including 68 students in Serbia, that have used the interface for remote collaborative control of manufacturing systems to control of CNC machine located in Portugal. Our previous surveys have shown that group work consumes less time than individual work in most working options. This paper examines influence of homogeneity of the groups. Results of statistical examination show that percentages of errors are significantly or highly significantly higher in homogeneous compared to a non-homogeneous groups. Therefore, it could be recommended to form heterogeneous groups when remotely controlling decentralized manufacturing processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Porter, M.E., Heppelmann, J.E.: How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(11), 64–88 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brkic, V.S., Putnik, G., Veljković, Z., Shah, V., Essdai, A., Castro, H.: Interfaces for distributed remote user controlled manufacturing: working individually or in collaborative group? Proc. Manuf. 3, 747–753 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brkic Spasojevic, V., Putnik, G., Veljković, Z. A., Shah, V., Essdai, A.: Interfaces for distributed remote user controlled manufacturing as collaborative environment. In: Nunes, I.L. (ed.) AFHE 2016. LNCS, vol. 497, pp. 335–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ding, K., Jiang, P., Leng, J., Cao, W.: Modeling and analyzing of an enterprise relationship network in the context of social manufacturing. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. B J. Eng. Manuf. 230(4), 752–769 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, W.M., Lünnemann, P., Neumeyer, S., Hayka, H., Stark, R.: Product development in collaborative networks – an expert view on current challenges and future trends. In: Afsarmanesh, H., Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Lucas Soares, A. (eds.) PRO-VE 2016. LNCS, vol. 480, pp. 302–312. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Filip, F.G., Zamfirescu, C.B., Ciurea, C.: Collaborative activities and methods. Comput. Support. Collaborative Decis. Making. 4, 71–120 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Galeano, N., Molina, A.: Collaborative networked organizations—concepts and practice in manufacturing enterprises. Comput. Ind. Eng. 57(1), 46–60 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Camarinha-Matos, L.M.: Collaborative networks in industry and the role of PRO-VE. Int. J. Prod. Manag. Eng. 2(2), 53–56 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Q., Shi, Y.J.: Grid manufacturing: a new solution for cross-enterprise collaboration. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 36(1–2), 205–212 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Spasojević-Brkić, V.K., Putnik, G., Veljković, Z.A., Shah, V., Castro, H.: Representational fidelity in distributed and remote lab environment. FME Trans. 42(3), 243–248 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mikropoulos, T.A.: Presence: a unique characteristic in educational virtual environments. Virtual Real. 10(3–4), 197–206 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mikropoulos, T.A., Strouboulis, V.: Factors that influence presence in educational virtual environments. Cyber Psychol. Behav. 7(5), 582–591 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dalgarno, B., Lee, M.J.: What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? Br. J. Educ. Technol. 41(1), 10–32 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubey, R., Gunasekran, A., Chakrabarty, A.: Ubiquitous manufacturing: overview, framework and further research. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 30, 1–14 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spasojevic-Brkic, V.K., Putnik, G.: User evaluation of interfaces for remote control manufacturing systems. Serb. J. Manag. 8(2), 201–212 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mejía-Gutiérrez, R., Osorio-Gómez, G., Ríos-Zapata, D., Zuluaga-Holguín, D.: Ubiquitous conceptual design of a ubiquitous application: A textile SME case study for real time manufacturing monitoring. Comput. Aided Des. 59, 214–228 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Montgomery, D.C., Runger, G.C.: Probability and Statistics for Engineers, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by grants for bilateral cooperation project “Design and Evaluation of User Interfaces for Remote Collaborative Control of Manufacturing Systems” between Serbia and Portugal, financed by Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development (MESTD) and Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), respectively and grant SPRINCE - SAF€RA by MESTD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vesna Spasojevic Brkic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Nomenclature

Appendix: Nomenclature

Nomenclature

 

AGE

Average age per group

GPA

Grade point average per group with scale 6 to 10

CLT

Average computer literacy per group

CKT

Average capability of knowledge transfer per group

LNS

Average desirability for learning new software per group

CKT

Average capability for knowledge transfer per group

LST

Learning style - individual or in group

GEN

Gender - male of female

NOE

Number or percentage of errors in task execution

NOC

Number or percentage of correct task executions

HO

Homogenous group

HO1

Homogenous group for individual learning style

HE

Heterogeneous group

HE1

Heterogeneous group for individual learning style

WA

“Wall” interface

WI

“Window” interface

D

Desktop screen

V

Video beam presentation

N

Number of participants in the group

Av

Mean value of the variable in the group

Me

Median value of the variable in the group

Sd

Standard deviation of the variable in the group

cv (%)

Coefficient of variation for the group

Kol

Kolmogorov normality test

p

p value(level) of the test

n.s.

Statistically non-significant result

r 2 (%)

Coefficient of determination

Sp. corr.

Spearman correlation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brkic, V.S., Putnik, G., Veljkovic, Z.A., Shah, V., Essdai, A. (2018). Group Characteristics and Task Accuracy in Distributed Remote User Controlled Manufacturing as Collaborative Environment. In: Nunes, I. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 592. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60366-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60366-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60365-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60366-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics