Skip to main content

Encompassing the Work-Life Balance into Early Career Decision-Making of Future Employees Through the Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Leadership (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 594))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper presents the results of ranking of the significance of quality of life determinants by University students that are starting professional activities. Research methodology: literature review; elaboration of an AHP decision-making model; two-stage expert selection; significance rankings by experts and a graphical and descriptive presentation of obtained results. Research sample: 14 experts out of almost 200 University students. Research outcome: a decision-making model that aims at maximizing the life satisfaction of future employees as a function of their individual assessments of significance of particular determinants of quality of life. Research implications: a more accurate adaptation to trends on the labor market and creation of new business models. Research limitation: narrowing the group of experts to University students. Value added of the research: better-motivated employees with a satisfactory level of work-life balance will contribute to an increase of societal satisfaction level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smith, A.: The Theory of Moral Sentiments. A. Millar, A. Kincaid & J. Bell, Strand, Edinburgh (1759)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Learmonth, Y.C., Alwick, E.A., McAuley, E., Motl, R.W.: Quality of life and health-related QoL over 1 year in older women: monitoring stability and reliability of measurement. Soc. Ind. Res. 123(1), 267–279 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0729-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Diener, E.D., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., Griffin, S.: The satisfaction with life scale. J. Pers. Assess. 49(1), 71–75 (1985). doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C.R., Sandvik, E.: Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. J. Pers. Assess. 57(1), 149–161 (1991). doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lau, E.Y.Y., Cheung, S.-H., Lam, J., Hui, C.H., Cheung, S.-F., Mok, D.S.Y.: Purpose-driven life: life goals as a predictor of quality of life and psychological health. J. Happiness Stud. 16(5), 1163–1184 (2015). doi:10.1007/s10902-014-9552-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. WHOQOL SRPB Group: Group: a cross-cultural study of spirituality, religion, and personal beliefs as components of quality of life. Soc. Sci. Med. 62(6), 1486–1497 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zuzanek, J.: Time use imbalances: developmental and emotional costs. In: Matuska, K., Christiansen, C. (eds.) Life Balance: Biological, Psychological and Sociological Perspectives on Lifestyle and Health, pp. 207–222. AOTA Press, Bethesda (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen, K.B.: Exploring compatibility between “subjective well-being” and “sustainable living” in Scandinavia. Soc. Ind. Res. 122(1), 175–187 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0684-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maslow, A.: Motivation and Personality. Harper, New York (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abel-Smith, B., Townsend, P.: The poor and the poorest. Occasional Papers on Social Administration, vol. 17, Bell & Sons, London (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graafland, J., Compen, B.: Economic freedom and life satisfaction: mediation by income per capita and generalized trust. J. Happiness Stud. 16(3), 789–810 (2015). doi:10.1007/s10902-014-9534-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Atkinson, A.B.: The Economics of Inequality, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Atkinson, A.B.: Multidimensional deprivation: contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. J. Econ. Inequality 1, 51–65 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sen, A.K.: Personal utilities and public judgements: or what’s wrong with welfare economics? Econ. J. 89(355), 537–558 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sen, A.K.: Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sen, A.K.: Inequality Reexamined. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sen, A.K.: Capability and wellbeing. In: Nussbaum, M., Sen, A.K. (eds.) The Quality of Life, pp. 30–53. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Sen, A.K.: Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schuessler, K.F., Fisher, G.A.: Quality of life research and sociology. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 11, 129–149 (1985). doi:10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.001021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Layard, R.: Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. Penguin Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J.-P. (eds.): Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. CMEPSP, Paris (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alkire, S., Foster, J.: Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. J. Public Econ. 95, 476–487 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ulman, P., Šoltés, E.: The monetary and non-monetary aspects of poverty in Poland and Slovakia. Entrepreneurial Bus. Econ. Rev. 3(1), 61–73 (2015). doi:10.15678/EBER.2015.030105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Şerban-Oprescu, G.: Economic approaches to sustainability and quality of life – an epistemological study. Rom. Econ. J. 46(bis), 79–96 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simkins, T.J., Peterson, M.: Assessing the value of a societal-level sustainability index for macromarketing research. J. Macromarketing 36(1), 78–95 (2016). doi:10.1177/0276146715586834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang, J., Travaglione, A., O’Neill, G.: How can gender signal employee qualities in retailing? J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 27, 24–30 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang, Y., Hornung, S.: Work-family enrichment through I-Deals: evidence from Chinese employees. J. Manag. Psychol. 30(8), 940–954 (2015). doi:10.1108/JMP-02-2013-0064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Adame, C., Caplliure, E.-M., Miquel, M.-J.: Work–life balance and firms: a matter of women? J. Bus. Res. 69(4), 1379–1383 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ren, X., Caudle, D.: Walking the tightrope between work and non-work life: strategies employed by British and Chinese academics and their implications. Stud. High. Educ. 41(4), 599–618 (2016). doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.942277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Russo, M., Shteigman, A., Carmeli, A.: Workplace and family support and work–life balance: implications for individual psychological availability and energy at work. J. Positive Psychol. 11(2), 173–188 (2016). doi:10.1080/17439760.2015.1025424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zheng, C., Kashi, K., Fan, D., Molineux, J., Ee, M.S.: Impact of individual coping strategies and organisational work–life balance programmes on Australian employee well-being. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage. 27(5), 501–526 (2016). doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1020447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gawlik, R., Jacobsen, G.: Work-life balance decision-making of Norwegian students: implications for human resources management. Entrepreneurial Bus. Econ. Rev. 4(4), 153–170 (2016). doi:10.15678/EBER.2016.040410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Żur, A.: Social problems as sources of opportunity: antecedents of social entrepreneurship opportunities. Entrepreneurial Bus. Econ. Rev. 3(4), 73–87 (2015). doi:10.15678/EBER.2015.030405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Neumark, D., Muz, J.: The “business climate” and economic inequality. Rev. Income Wealth 62(1), 161–180 (2016). doi:10.1111/roiw.12146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Arechavala, N.S., Espina, P.Z., Trapero, B.P.: The economic crisis and its effects on the quality of life in the European Union. S. Ind. Res. 120(2), 323–343 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0595-9

  36. Sałabun, W.: Reduction in the number of comparisons required to create matrix of expert judgment in the COMET method. Manage. Prod. Eng. Rev. 5(3), 62–69 (2014). doi:10.2478/mper-2014-0028

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zopounidis, C., Doumpos, M.: Multicriteria decision systems for financial problems. TOP 21(2), 241–261 (2013). doi:10.1007/s11750-013-0279-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Rezaei, J.: Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53, 49–57 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ivlev, I., Vacek, J., Kneppo, P.: Multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the selection of medical devices under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 247, 216–228 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.075

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Durbach, I.N., Stewart, T.J.: Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(1), 1–14 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.038

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. de Almeida, A.T., de Almeida, J.A., Costa, A.P.C.S., de Almeida-Filho, A.T.: A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250, 179–191 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.058

  42. Ben Amor, S., Jabeur, K., Martel, J.-M.: Multiple criteria aggregation procedure for mixed evaluations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181, 1506–1515 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.048

  43. Pomerol, J.C., Barba-Romero, S.: Multicriterion decision in management: principles and practice. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol. 25. Springer, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cabello, J.M., Luque, M., Miguel, F., Ruiz, A.B., Ruiz, F.: A multiobjective interactive approach to determine the optimal electricity mix in Andalucía (Spain). TOP 22(1), 109–127 (2014). doi:10.1007/s11750-011-0236-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Varmazyar, M., Dehghanbaghi, M., Afkhami, M.: A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach. Eval. Program Plann. 58, 125–140 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gawlik, R.: Methodological aspects of qualitative-quantitative analysis of decision-making processes. Manage. Prod. Eng. Rev. 7(2), 3–11 (2016). doi:10.1515/mper-2016-0011

    Google Scholar 

  47. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Saaty, T.L.: Decision Making for Leaders: the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Saaty, T.L.: Multicriteria Decision Making. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gawlik, R.: The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to analyse international corporations’ operating environment. Cracow Rev. Econ. Manage. 891, 19–30 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Belton, V., Gear, A.E.: On a shortcoming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. Omega 11(3), 228–230 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Dyer, J.S.: Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Manage. Sci. 36(3), 249–258 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Barzilai, J.: Notes on the analytic hierarchy process. In: Proceedings of the 2001 NSF Design, Service and Manufacturing Grantees and Research Conference, pp. 1–6. NSF, Tampa (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L., Whitaker, R.: Addressing with brevity criticism of the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process 1(2), 121–134 (2009). doi:10.13033/ijahp.v1i2.53

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gawlik, R.: Material and non-material determinants of European youth’s life quality. In: Delener, N., Fuxman, L., Lu, F.V., Rodrigues, S., Rivera, L.E. (eds.) Globalizing Businesses for the Next Century: Visualizing and Developing Contemporary Approaches to Harness Future Opportunities, pp. 339–346. GBATA, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Gawlik, R., Titarenko, R., Titov, S.: Perception of quality of life and its components between russian students and its implications for university lecturers. Horiz. Polit. 6(16), 127–150 (2015). doi:10.17399/HP.2015.061606

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gawlik, R.: Stratification of research target group and selection of experts for AHP–based decision making model (Stratyfikacja próby badawczej i dobór ekspertów na przykładzie modelu decyzyjnego opartego na metodzie AHP, in Polish). Studia i Materiały “Miscellanea Oeconomicae” 20(3), 193–200 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Newman, A., Nielsen, I., Smyth, R., Hooke, A.: Examining the relationship between workplace support and life satisfaction: the mediating role of job satisfaction. Soc. Ind. Res. 120(3), 769–781 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0613-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Science Centre of Poland (decision No.: DEC 2013/11/D/HS4/04070) within a research project entitled “The Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Analyzing Material and Non-material Determinants of Life Quality of Young Europeans” lead by Remigiusz Gawlik, Ph.D. between 2014 and 2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Remigiusz Gawlik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gawlik, R. (2018). Encompassing the Work-Life Balance into Early Career Decision-Making of Future Employees Through the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: Kantola, J., Barath, T., Nazir, S. (eds) Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Leadership. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 594. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60372-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60372-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60371-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60372-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics