Abstract
As robotic technology advances, we experience a shift from seeing robots behind a barrier to working with robots as teammates. Building co-adaptive human-robot relationships will enable better teamwork between a human and a robot. Co-adaptive agents adapt their behavior over time in response to a dynamic understanding of the individual human operator. Creating a co-adaptive human-robot team requires bi-directional and non-invasive communication between the human and the robot. The presented study investigates the impact of individual traits on performance with three styles of adapting software. Results from this study indicate a need to tailor a co-adaptive robot’s behavior for the individual, including operator traits – specifically dispositional trust and extraversion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hayes, B., Scassellati, B.: Autonomously constructing hierarchical task networks for planning and human-robot collaboration. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 5469–5476 (2016)
Evans, A., Marge, M., Stump, E., Warnell, G., Conroy, J., Summers-Stay, D., Baran, D.: The future of human robot teams in the army: factors affecting a model of human-system dialogue towards greater team collaboration. In: Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems, p. 197 (2017)
Nikolaidis, S., Nath, S., Procaccia, A.D., Srinivasa, S.: Game-theoretic modeling of human adaptation in human-robot collaboration. In: Proceedings of Human Robot Interaction, Vienna, Austria, March 2017
Burke, C.S., Stagl, K.C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., Kendall, D.: Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. Appl. Psychol. 91(6), 1189 (2006)
Salas, E., Cooke, N.J., Rosen, M.A.: On teams, teamwork, and team performance: discoveries and developments. Hum. Factors 50(3), 540–547 (2008)
Cha, E., Dragan, A.D., Srinivasa, S.S.: Perceived robot capability. In: Proceedings of Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 541–548 (2015)
Shen, Q., Dautenhahn, K., Saunders, J., Kose, H.: Can real-time, adaptive human – robot motor coordination improve humans’ overall perception of a robot? IEEE Trans. Auton. Ment. Dev. 7(1), 52–64 (2015)
Li, Y., Tee, K.P., Chan, W.L., Yan, R., Chua, Y., Limbu, D.K.: Role adaptation of human and robot in collaborative tasks. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 5602–5607 (2015)
Shannon, C.J., Horney, D.C., Jackson, K.F., How, J.P.: Human-autonomy teaming using flexible human performance models: an initial pilot study. In: Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems, p. 211 (2016)
Harriott, C.E., Adams, J.A.: Modeling human performance for human–robot systems. Rev. Hum. Factors Ergon. 9(1), 94–130 (2013)
Winter, D.G., John, O.P., Stewart, A.J., Klohnen, E.C., Duncan, L.E.: Traits and motives: toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychol. Rev. 105(2), 230 (1998)
John, O.: The ‘Big Five’ factor taxonomy: dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In: Pervin, L. (ed.) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. Guilford, New York (1990)
Gajos, K.Z., Chauncey, K.: The influence of personality traits and cognitive load on the use of adaptive user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 301–306 (2017)
Cristy, J., Bergougnoux, K., Bogart, R., Peterson, J.W., Brown, N., Chiarappa, M., Crimmins, T.R., Edwards, T., Fojtik, J., Franklin, F.J., Friedl, M.: ImageMagick (1994). http://www.imagemagick.org
Marzollo, J., Wick, W., Carson, C.D.: I SPY: A Book of Picture Riddles. Cartwheel Books, New York (1992)
Goldberg, L.R., Johnson, J.A., Eber, H.W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M.C., Cloninger, C.R., Gough, H.C.: The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. J. Res. Pers. 40, 84–96 (2006)
Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E.: The need for cognition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 42(1), 116 (1982)
Levenson, H.: Differentiating among internality, powerful others, and chance. In: Lefcourt, H.M. (ed.) Research with the Locus of Control Construct, vol. 1, pp. 15–63. Academic Press, New York (1981)
Chauncey, K., Harriott, C.E., Prasov, Z., Cunha, M.: A framework for co-adaptive human-robot interaction metrics. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Human-Robot Collaboration at IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Daejeon, Korea, October 2016
Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)
Mariano, L.J., Poore, J.C., Krum, D.M., Schwartz, J.L., Coskren, W.D., Jones, E.M.: Modeling strategic use of human computer interfaces with novel hidden Markov models. Front. Psychol. 6, 919 (2015)
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by Draper Internal Research & Development. The authors thank Ryan Brill, Brian Kimerer, and Krysta Chauncey for their contributions to this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Harriott, C.E., Garver, S., Cunha, M. (2018). A Motivation for Co-adaptive Human-Robot Interaction. In: Chen, J. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 595. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60384-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60384-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60383-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60384-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)