Abstract
Although it is clear that we must satisfy both economy and safety, we sometimes place more emphasis on economy than safety, which leads to a critical disaster or crash. The reason must be identified for the further enhancement of safety. This study explored why one cannot satisfy both economy and safety. We attempted to explain the reason using the collapse model of proper balance between safety and economy (efficiency) induced by the following cognitive biases: (i) mental accounting, (ii) loss aversion, and (iii) discount of safety. The measure or remedy of this collapse of the proper balance between safety and economy (efficiency) was proposed as (a) disclosure system, (b) commitment approach to safety, and (c) mechanism design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Murata, A.: On verification of gradual escalation phenomenon of violation behavior using an experimental paradigm of diversification of risk. Psychol. Res. 5(3), 197–204 (2015)
Thaler, R.A.: The Winner’s Curse-Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)
Thaler, R.A., Sunstein, C.R.: Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin, New York (2008)
Thaler, R.A.: Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioural Economics. Penguin, NewYork (2016)
Shiller, R.J.: Irrational Exuberance. Broadway Books, New York (2005)
Murata, A., Matsushita, Y.: Hindsight bias in cause analysis of accident. Psychol. Res. 4(11), 843–851 (2014)
Murata, A.: Anchoring bias in relationship between objective and subjective probability. Psychol. Res. 4(12), 936–943 (2014)
Murata, A.: Loss aversion underlying violation. Psychol. Res. 5(4), 225–231 (2015)
Murata, A.: On persistency of endowment effect-relationship between affection and endowment effect. Psychol. Res. 5(5), 287–291 (2015)
Murata, A., Nakamura, T., Karwowski, W.: Influence of cognitive biases in distorting decision making and leading to critical unfavorable incidents. Safety 1(1), 44–58 (2015)
Murata, A., Nakamura, T.: Effect of intention on outcome bias in decision making: implications for safety management. J. Behav. Brain Sci. 5, 561–569 (2015)
Murata, A., Morinaga, T.: Unnoticed unethical behavior when gradually escalated: implications for management of safety. Int. J. Appl. Behav. Econ. 5(2), 1–10 (2016)
Murata, A., Matsushita, Y.: Insensitivity to unethical behavior in dictator game when indirectly intermediated: effect of instruction condition for evaluator on punishment to dictator. J. Behav. Brain Sci. 6, 199–208 (2016)
Sigurdsson, S.O., Taylor, M.A., Wirth, O.: Discounting the value of safety: effects of perceived risk and effort. J. Saf. Res. 46, 127–134 (2013)
Kirby, K.N., Petry, N.M., Bickel, W.K.: Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 28(1), 78–87 (1999)
Loewenstein, G., Sunstein, C.R., Golman, R.: Disclosure: psychology changes everything. Annu. Rev. Econ. 6, 391–419 (2014)
Frank, R.H.: Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (1988)
Bazerman, M.H., Tenbrunsel, A.E.: Blind Spots. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011)
Bazerman, M.H., Moore, D.A.: Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. Wiley, Danvers (2013)
Bateson, M., Nettle, D., Roberts, G.: Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biol. Lett. 2, 412–414 (2006)
Damasio, A.: Decartes’ Error. Penguin Books, New York (1994)
Damasio, A.: The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness. Vintage Books, London (2000)
Jacob, G., Ching-to, M.A.: Efficient allocation of a “prize”: King Solomon’s dilemma. Games Econ. Behav. 1, 222–233 (1989)
Qin, C.-Z., Yang, C.-L.: Make a guess: a robust mechanism for King Solomon’s Dilemma. Econ. Theory 39, 259–268 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Murata, A., Moriwaka, M. (2018). Anomaly in Safety Management: Is It Constantly Possible to Make Safety Compatible with Economy?. In: Arezes, P. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 604. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60525-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60525-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60524-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60525-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)