Skip to main content

Task Analysis as a Cornerstone Technique for Human Reliability Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 589))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1542 Accesses

Abstract

Qualitative analysis is essential for obtaining credible and useful HRA results, yet most HRA method descriptions fail to adequately describe how to perform qualitative analysis. Research by the Halden Reactor Project identified task analysis as one of the key qualitative techniques for HRA, and also one of the most challenging for less experienced analysts. This paper makes an argument for why task analysis should be considered a cornerstone technique for qualitative HRA, and also describes current Halden research activities to investigate the role of task analysis in HRA, and to develop support tools for analysts to address these challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Forester, J., Dang, V.N., Bye, A., Lois, E., Massaiu, S., Broberg, H., Braarud, P.Ø., Boring, R., Männistö, I., Liao, H., Julius, J., Parry, G., Nelson, P.: The international HRA empirical study final report: lessons learned from comparing HRA methods predictions to HAMMLAB simulator data. HPR-373/NUREG-2127, OECD Halden Reactor Project (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liao, H., Forester, J., Dang, V.N., Bye, A., Lois, E., Chang, J.: Lessons learned from the US HRA empirical study. In: Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2012, Hawaii, 22–27 June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor, C.: Improving scenario analysis for HRA. In: Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2012 Hawaii, 22–27 June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boring, R.: How many performance shaping factors are necessary for human reliability analysis? In: Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2010, Seattle, Washington, 7–11 June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oxstrand, J., Kelly, D.L., Shen, S., Mosleh, A., Groth, K.M.: A model-based approach to HRA: qualitative analysis methodology. In: The 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management Conference and ESREL 2012, Helsinki, Finland, 25–29 June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  6. Le Bot, P.: Human reliability data, human error and accident models – illustration through the three mile island accident analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 83, 153–157 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. NUREG-1921: EPRI/NRC-RES Fire Human Reliability Analysis Guidelines, Final Report. EPRI Report Number 1023001, Electric Power Research Institute, California, July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parry, G.W., Forester, J.A., Dang, V.N., Hendrikson, S.M.L., Presley, M., Lois, E., Xing, J.: IDHEAS – a new approach for human reliability analysis. In: International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, PSA 2013, Columbia, South Carolina, 22–26 September 2013

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bye, A., Lauman, K., Taylor, C., Rasmussen, M., Øie, S., van de Merwe, K., Øien, K., Boring, R., Paltrinieri, N., Wæro, I., Massaiu, S., Gould, K.: Petro-HRA, a new method for human reliability analysis in the petroleum industry. In: Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2013, Seoul, Korea, 2–7 October 2016

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor, C.: How HRA can drive plant improvement. In: 25th European Safety and Reliability Association Conference, ESREL 2015, Zurich, Switzerland, 7–10 September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor, C.: The importance of operator input to human reliability analysis. In: International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment, PSA 2015, Sun Valley, Idaho, 26–30 April 2015

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kirwan, B.: A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment. Taylor & Francis, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kirwan, B., Ainsworth, L.K.: A Guide to Task Analysis. Taylor & Francis, London (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Boring, R.L.: A task library for petroleum applications in human reliability analysis. In: PSAM 13 Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, Seoul, Korea, 2–7 October 2016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Taylor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Taylor, C. (2018). Task Analysis as a Cornerstone Technique for Human Reliability Analysis. In: Boring, R. (eds) Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 589. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60645-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60645-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60644-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60645-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics