Skip to main content

Effect of Rater Expertise on Subjective Agility Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Sports, Injury Prevention and Outdoor Recreation (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 603))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Agility performance is often quantified using completion time, which provides little information about which factors contribute to or limit an individual’s performance. The objective of this study was to determine how novices and experts working in athletic, clinical, and military environments qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate agility performance. Formalizing expert definitions will inform the development of objective biomechanical metrics, which have the potential to inform strategy development for training and rehabilitation. Thirty-three participants completed a survey which involved scoring 16 athletes on a 7 point Likert scale of not agile to agile. The spread of the scores indicated that even within groups, participants had different opinions about which aspects of technique contributed to high performance. Participant responses were used to link several terms to agility technique. Future work includes quantitatively defining and evaluating these terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sheppard, J.M., Young, W.B.: Agility literature review: classifications, training and testing. J. Sports Sci. 9, 919–932 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Spiteri, T., Newton, R.U., Nimphius, S.: Neuromuscular strategies contributing to faster multidirectional agility performance. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 25(4), 629–636 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, D.S., Barnette, B.J., Kiger, J.T., Mirasola, J.J., Young, S.M.: Physical characteristics that predict functional performance in division I college football players. J. Strength Conditioning Res. 18, 115–120 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gil, S.M., Gil, J., Ruiz, F., Irazusta, A., Irazusta, J.: Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of young soccer players according to their playing position: relevance for the selection process. J. Strength Conditioning Res. 21, 438–445 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pauole, K., Madole, K., Garhammer, J., Lacourse, M., Rozenek, R.: Reliability and validity of the T-test as a measure of agility, leg power, and leg speed in college-aged men and women. J. Strength Conditioning Res. 14(4), 443–450 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hachana, Y., Chaabène, H., Nabli, M.A., Attia, A., Moualhi, J., Farhat, N., Elloumi, M.: Test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and minimal detectable change of the Illinois agility test in male team sport athletes. J. Strength Conditioning Res. 27(10), 2752–2759 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanner, R., Gore, C.: Physiological Tests for Elite Athletes. Human Kinetics, IL (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spasic, M., Krolo, A., Zenic, N., Delextrat, A., Sekulic, D.: Reactive agility performance in handball; development and evaluation of a sport-specific measurement protocol. J. Sports Sci. Med. 14, 501–506 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farrow, D., Young, W., Bruce, L.: The development of a test of reactive agility for netball: a new methodology. J. Sci. Med. Sport 8(1), 52–60 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sekulic, D., Krolo, A., Spasic, M., Uljevic, O., Peric, M.: The development of a new stop‘n’go reactive-agility test. J. Strength Conditioning Res. 28(11), 3306–3312 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsitskaris, G., Theoharopoulos, A., Garefis, A.: Speed, speed dribble and agility of male basketball players playing in different positions. J. Hum. Mov. 45(1), 21–30 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sekulic, D., Spasic, M., Mirkov, D., Cavar, M.: Gender-specific influences of balance, speed, and power on agility performance. J. Strength Conditioning Res. 27(3), 802–811 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marković, G., Sekulić, D., Marković, M.: Is agility related to strength qualities?-Analysis in latent space. Collegium Antropologicum 31(3), 787–793 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yanci, J., Los Arcos, A.A., Mendiguchia, J., Brughelli, M.: Relationships between sprinting, agility one-and two-leg vertical and horizontal jump in soccer players. Kineziologija 46(2), 194–201 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sasaki, S., Nagano, Y., Kaneko, S., Sakurai, T., Fukubayashi, T.: The relationship between performance and trunk movement during change of direction. J. Sports Sci. Med. 10(1), 112 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marshall, B.M., Franklyn-Miller, A.D., King, E.A., Moran, K.A., Strike, S.C., Falvey, É.C.: Biomechanical factors associated with time to complete a change of direction cutting maneuver. J. Strength Conditioning Res. 28(10), 2845–2851 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. King, L.A., Horak, F.B.: Delaying mobility disability in people with Parkinson disease using a sensorimotor agility exercise program. Phys. Ther. 89(4), 384 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raya, M.A., Gailey, R.S., Gaunaurd, I.A., Jayne, D.M., Campbell, S.M., Gagne, E., Tucker, C.: Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren side step test, T-test, and Illinois agility test. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 50(7), 951–960 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maio, G.R., Roese, N.J., Seligman, C., Katz, A.: Rankings, ratings, and the measurement of values: evidence for the superior validity of ratings. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 18(2), 171–181 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sullivan, G.M., Artino Jr., A.R.: Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 5(4), 541–542 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the US Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center (W911QY-13-C-0011) and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 1122374. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor. The author’s would like to thank our collaborators at the University of Michigan for providing the videos of the athletes on the obstacle course and performing the data collection, in particular Prof. Noel Perkins, Mr. Steven Davidson, Dr. Stephen Cain, Dr. Lauro Ojeda, Ms. Rachel Vitali, Mr. Jon Mendicelli, Mr. Nathan Kossey, and Mr. Cody McKay.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chika Eke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA)

About this paper

Cite this paper

Eke, C., Stirling, L. (2018). Effect of Rater Expertise on Subjective Agility Assessment. In: Ahram, T. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Sports, Injury Prevention and Outdoor Recreation. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 603. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60822-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60822-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60821-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60822-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics