Skip to main content

A Fuzzy Linguistics Supported Model to Measure the Contextual Bias in Sentiment Polarity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017 (EUSFLAT 2017, IWIFSGN 2017)

Abstract

The polarity detection problem typically relies on experimental dictionaries, where terms are assigned polarity scores lacking contextual information. As a matter of fact, the polarity is highly dependant on the domain or community it is analysed, so we can speak of a contextual bias. We propose a method supported by fuzzy linguistic modelling to quantify this contextual bias and to enable the bias-aware sentiment analysis. To show how our approach work, we measure the bias of common concepts in two different domains and discuss the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.ted.org.

References

  1. Araújo, M., Gonçalves, P., Cha, M., Benevenuto, F.: iFeel: a system that compares and combines sentiment analysis methods. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 75–78. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: Sentiwordnet 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: LREC, vol. 10, pp. 2200–2204 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernabé-Moreno, J., Tejeda-Lorente, A., Porcel, C., Fujita, H., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Caresome: a system to enrich marketing customers acquisition and retention campaigns using social media information. Knowl. Based Syst. 80, 163–179 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernabé-Moreno, J., Tejeda-Lorente, A., Porcel, C., Fujita, H., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Emotional profiling of locations based on social media. Procedia Comput. Sci. 55, 960–969 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cambria, E., Poria, S., Bajpai, R., Schuller, B.: Senticnet 4: a semantic resource for sentiment analysis based on conceptual primitives. In: the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Osaka (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daku, M., Soroka, S., Young, L.: Lexicoder, version 2.0 (software). McGill University, Montreal (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dodds, P.S., Danforth, C.M.: Measuring the happiness of large-scale written expression: songs, blogs, and presidents. J. Happiness Stud. 11(4), 441–456 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gonçalves, P., Araújo, M., Benevenuto, F., Cha, M.: Comparing and combining sentiment analysis methods. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Online Social Networks, pp. 27–38. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greaves, F., Ramirez-Cano, D., Millett, C., Darzi, A., Donaldson, L.: Use of sentiment analysis for capturing patient experience from free-text comments posted online. J. Med. Internet Res. 15(11), e239 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Aggregation operators for linguistic weighted information. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. 27, 646–656 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Herrera, F., Martínez, L.: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8(6), 746–752 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herrera, F., Martínez, L.: A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranularity hierarchical linguistic contexts in multiexpert decision-making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 31(2), 227–234 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Chiclana, F.: Computing with words and decision making. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 8(4), 323–324 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining opinion features in customer reviews. AAAI 4, 755–760 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ieong, S., Mishra, N., Sadikov, E., Zhang, L.: Domain bias in web search. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 413–422. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Iqbal, M., Karim, A., Kamiran, F.: Bias-aware lexicon-based sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 845–850. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jockers, M.L.: Revealing Sentiment and Plot Arcs with the Syuzhet Package, February 2015

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E., Booth, R.J.: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2001, vol. 71. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahway (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Polanyi, L., Zaenen, A.: Contextual valence shifters. In: Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications, pp. 1–10. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salter-Townshend, M., Murphy, T.B.: Mixtures of biased sentiment analysers. Adv. Data Anal. Classif. 8(1), 85–103 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmid, H.: Improvements in part-of-speech tagging with an application to German. In: Proceedings of the ACL SIGDAT-Workshop. Citeseer (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thelwall, M.: Heart and soul: sentiment strength detection in the social web with sentistrength. In: Proceedings of the CyberEmotions, pp. 1–14 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wadbude, R., Gupta, V., Mekala, D., Jindal, J., Karnick, H.: User bias removal in fine grained sentiment analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.06821 (2016)

  24. Wang, H., Can, D., Kazemzadeh, A., Bar, F., Narayanan, S.: A system for real-time twitter sentiment analysis of 2012 US presidential election cycle. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2012 System Demonstrations, pp. 115–120. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the panas scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54(6), 1063 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. West, R., Paskov, H.S., Leskovec, J., Potts, C.: Exploiting social network structure for person-to-person sentiment analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.2450 (2014)

  27. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity: an exploration of features for phrase-level sentiment analysis. Comput. Linguist. 35(3), 399–433 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zadeh, L.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning. Part I Inf. Sci. 8, 199–249 (1975). Part II Inf. Sci. 8, 301–357 (1975), Part III Inf. Sci. 9, 43–80 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper has been developed with the FEDER financing under Projects TIN2013-40658-P and TIN2016-75850-R.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrique Herrera-Viedma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bernabé-Moreno, J., Tejeda-Lorente, A., Porcel, C., Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). A Fuzzy Linguistics Supported Model to Measure the Contextual Bias in Sentiment Polarity. In: Kacprzyk, J., Szmidt, E., Zadrożny, S., Atanassov, K., Krawczak, M. (eds) Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017. EUSFLAT IWIFSGN 2017 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 641. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66830-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66830-7_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66829-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66830-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics