Abstract
The aim of present study was to improve the safety and the effectiveness of the in-vehicle display for camera monitor systems (CMS). The experimental factors were the size of the display and the location of the display. The participants were required to simultaneously carry out a tracking task and a rearward monitoring task. The evaluation measures were: the reaction time and the percentage correct reactions to the rearward stimuli, the tracking error, the car distance between own and the preceding car, and the horizontal neck movement. As a result, the reaction time, the percentage of correct reaction, the neck movement of CMS were better than the traditional side mirrors. It suggests CMS is safer and more effective than the side mirrors. Particularly, more than 5-in. display which was located at smaller visual angle had faster and more accurate reaction. This condition would be one of the design requirements for CMS.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rau, P., Fitch, G.M, Blanco, M., Hanowski, R.J., Camden, M.C.: Driver Performance with a Camera/Video Imaging System, In: Proceedings of 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, No. 11–0443 (2011)
McLaughlin, S., Hankey, J., Green, C., Kiefer, R.: Driver performance evaluation of two rear parking aids, In: Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (2003)
Large, D.E., Crundall, E., Burnett, G., Harvey, C., Konstantopoulos, P.: Driving without wings: the effect of different digital mirror locations on the visual behavior, performance and opinion of drivers. Appl. Ergonomics 55, 138–148 (2016)
Schmidt, E.A., Hoffmann, R., Bierbach, M., Gail, J., Lots-Keens, C.: Final Report Camera-Monitor Systems as a Replacement for Exterior Mirrors in Cars and Trucks. https://www2.unune.org/wiki/download/attachments/25264588/IGCIG-II-07-17%20BASt%20Final_Report_CMS.PDF
Beck, D., Lee, M., Park, W.: A comparative evaluation of in-vehicle side view displays layouts in critical lane changing situation. Ergonomics 60(12), 1682–1691 (2017)
Lamble, D., Laakso, M., Summala, H.: Detection thresholds in car following situations and peripheral vision: implications for positioning of visually demanding in-car displays. Ergonomics 42(6), 807–815 (1999)
Wittmann, M., Kiss, M., Gugg, P., Steffen, A., Fink, M., Poppel, F., Kamiya, H.: Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving. Appl. Ergonomics 37(2), 187–199 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Doi, T., Murata, A., Moriwaka, M., Osagami, T. (2019). Camera Monitor Systems as Replacement of Side Mirror in Rearward Monitoring. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 786. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_49
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93884-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93885-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)