Skip to main content

The Impact of Ergonomic Guiding Principles on the Formation of Modern Monumental Art

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 788))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2536 Accesses

Abstract

Commemoration of historic events is now a commonplace phenomenon both in culture and in academic research. The phenomenon is linked to an increase in the representation of the visualisation of the past in public sphere, which in turn leads to reformulation of monumental art. Modern monuments are often spatial forms consisting both of sculpture installation and bigger constructions. In case of these realisations, the designers, wishing to create certain atmosphere among the users, have undertaken certain steps that are contrary to the guidelines set out in the norms concerning ergonomic use of space. Architecture, whose basic purpose is to provide a sense of security, implements construction solutions which make the user disoriented and feel uneasy. The purpose of this article is an analysis of intentional use of design practices related to non-ergonomic organisation of public spaces, creation of typologies of realised solutions and an attempt to present the consequences of undertaking such steps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Górska, E.: Ergonomia. Projektowanie, diagnoza, eksperymenty. Politechnika Warszawska, Warszawa (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Charytonowicz, J. (eds.): Zastosowania ergonomii. Wybrane kierunki badań ergonomicznych w roku 2015, Wrocław (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charytonowicz, J.: Architecture and ergonomics. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 44, pp. 6-103–6-106 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wierzbicka, A.M.: Architektura jako narracja znaczeniowa, Politechnika Warszawska, Warszawa (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Young, J.E.: Daniel Liebeskind’s Jewish Museum in Berlin: the uncanny arts of memorial architecture. Jewish Soc. Stud. 6(2), 1–23 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giacomin, J.: What is human centred design? Des. J. 17(4), 606–623 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bauman, Z.: Nowoczesność i Zagłada, Wydawnictwo Literackie, Kraków (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gębczyńska-Janowicz, A.: Polskie założenia pomnikowe: Rola architektury w tworzeniu miejsc pamięci od połowy XX wieku, Wydawnictwo Neriton, Warszawa (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lennon, J.J., Foley, M.: Dark tourism. Continuum, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Williams, P.H.: Memorial Museums: The Global Rush to Commemorate Atrocities. Berg, Oxford - New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marcuse, H.: Experiencing the Jewish Holocaust in Los Angeles: The Beit Hashoah—Museum of Tolerance. Other Voices 2 (2000). http://www.othervoices.org/2.1/marcuse/tolerance.php

  12. Lisus, N., Ericson, R.V.: Misplacing memory: the effects of television format on holocaust remembrance. Br. J. Sociol. 46(1), 1–19 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Young, J.E.: At Memory’s Edge: After-Images of the Holocaust in Contemporary Art and Architecture. Yale University Press, New Haven - London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sion, B.: Affective memory, ineffective functionality: experiencing Berlin’s memorial to the murdered Jews of Europe. In: Niven, B., Paver, C. (eds.) Memorialization in Germany since 1945, pp. 243–252. Springer, London (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. van Alphen, E.: Zabawa w Holocaust. Literatura na świecie 1–2, 217–244 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Arnold-de Simine, S.: Mediating Memory in the Museum: Trauma, Empathy, Nostalgia. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, New York (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Chrudzimska-Uhera, K.: Kamienne Piekło. Projekty Mirosława Nizio upamiętniające miejsca kaźni i zagłady: były niemiecki obóz koncentracyjny w Gross Rosen oraz Mauzoleum Martyrologii Wsi Polskiej w Michniowie. In: Chrudzimska-Uhera K., Gutowski B. (eds.) Rzeźba w Polsce (1945–2008), pp. 115–120. Centrum Rzeźby Polskiej, Orońsko (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnieszka Gębczyńska-Janowicz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gębczyńska-Janowicz, A. (2019). The Impact of Ergonomic Guiding Principles on the Formation of Modern Monumental Art. In: Charytonowicz, J., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Human Factors, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 788. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94199-8_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94199-8_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94198-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94199-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics