Skip to main content

Using Information Processing Strategies to Predict Contagion of Social Media Behavior: A Theoretical Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering (AHFE 2018)

Abstract

This study presents the Social Media Cognitive Processing model, which explains and predicts the depth of processing on social media based on three classic concepts from the offline literature about cognitive processing: self-generation, psychological distance, and self-reference. Together, these three dimensions have tremendous explanatory power in predicting the depth of processing a receiver will have in response to a sender’s message. Moreover, the model can be used to explain and predict the direction and degree of information proliferation. This model can be used in a variety of contexts (e.g., isolating influencers to persuade others about the merits of vaccination, to dispel fake news, or to spread political messages). We developed the model in the context of Brexit tweets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://support.gnip.com/apis/.

References

  1. McLuhan, M.: Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alloway, T.P., Alloway, R.G.: The impact of engagement with social networking sites (SNSs) on cognitive skills. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(5), 1748–1754 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brasel, S.A., Gips, J.: Media multitasking behavior: concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 14(9), 527–534 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosen, L.D., Carrier, L.M., Cheever, N.A.: Facebook and texting made me do it: media-induced task-switching while studying. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 948–958 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Booten, K.P.: A library of fragments: digital quotations, new literacies, and attention on social media. Doctoral dissertation. UC, Berkeley (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rosen, L.D., Whaling, K., Rab, S., Carrier, L.M., Cheever, N.A.: Is Facebook creating “iDisorders”? The link between clinical symptoms of psychiatric disorders and technology use, attitudes and anxiety. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 1243–1254 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Choudhury, M., Gamon, M., Counts, S., Horvitz, E.: Predicting depression via social media. In: ICWSM, vol. 13, pp. 1–10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frost, R.L., Rickwood, D.J.: A systematic review of the mental health outcomes associated with Facebook use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 76, 576–600 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eckler, P., Bolls, P.: Spreading the virus: emotional tone of viral advertising and its effect on forwarding intentions and attitudes. J. Interact. Advert. 11(2), 1–11 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hollebeek, L.D., Glynn, M.S., Brodie, R.J.: Consumer brand engagement in social media: conceptualization, scale development and validation. J. Interact. Mark. 28(2), 149–165 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ashley, C., Tuten, T.: Creative strategies in social media marketing: an exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Psychol. Mark. 32(1), 15–27 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Traphagan, T.W., Chiang, Y.H.V., Chang, H.M., Wattanawaha, B., Lee, H., Mayrath, M.C., Resta, P.E.: Cognitive, social and teaching presence in a virtual world and a text chat. Comput. Educ. 55(3), 923–936 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Junco, R., Cotten, S.R.: No A 4 U: the relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Comput. Educ. 59(2), 505–514 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Valkenburg, P.M.: Understanding self-effects in social media. Hum. Commun. Res. 43(4), 477–490 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Valkenburg, P.M., Peter, J.: The differential susceptibility to media effects model. J. Commun. 63(2), 221–243 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bertsch, S., Pesta, B.J., Wiscott, R., McDaniel, M.A.: The generation effect: a meta-analytic review. Mem. Cognit. 35(2), 201–210 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trope, Y., Liberman, N.: Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol. Rev. 117(2), 440 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Symons, C.S., Johnson, B.T.: The self-reference effect in memory: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 121(3), 371 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Craik, F.I., Lockhart, R.S.: Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 11(6), 671–684 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Craik, F.I., Watkins, M.J.: The role of rehearsal in short-term memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 12(6), 599–607 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Craik, F.I., Tulving, E.: Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 104(3), 268 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ajzen, I., Sexton, J.: Depth of processing, belief congruence, and attitude-behavior correspondence. In: Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, pp. 117–138 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Radvansky, G.A., Ashcraft, M.H.: Learning and remembering. In: Cognition, 6th edn, pp. 184–188. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. DeWinstanley, P.A., Bjork, E.L.: Processing strategies and the generation effect: implications for making a better reader. Mem. Cognit. 32(6), 945–955 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Slamecka, N.J., Graf, P.: The generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Learn. Mem. 4(6), 592 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Muntinga, D.G., Moorman, M., Smit, E.G.: Introducing COBRAs. Int. J. Advert. 30, 13–46 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bellezza, F.S.: Recall of congruent information in the self-reference task. Bull. Psychonom. Soc. 30(4), 275–278 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gillihan, S.J., Farah, M.J.: Is the self special? A critical review of evidence from experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Psychol. Bull. 131, 76–97 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rogers, T.B., Kuiper, N.A., Kirker, W.S.: Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35(9), 677 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara M. Levens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Levens, S.M. et al. (2019). Using Information Processing Strategies to Predict Contagion of Social Media Behavior: A Theoretical Model. In: Ahram, T. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 787. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94229-2_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics