Skip to main content

The Moderating Roles of Network Density and Redundancy in Lurking Behavior on User-Generated-Content Online Communities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 787))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Sharing content is one of the important ways of information diffusion in online UGC (User-Generated Content), communities. Most of previous research on the sharing behavior focused on predicting the sharing behavior by the inherent characteristics of the posts. This study addressed the important role of social networking characteristics, including network structure and information density, on users’ sharing behavior. Based on a social network from a large UGC platform in China, this study analyzed the panel data of 10,000 users of their daily activities. The results showed that network density and redundancy jointly influenced users’ sharing behavior. This study contributes to social network theory by providing new empirical evidence on user-generated content diffusion in UGC community. In particular, it explained how network density moderating the effect of users on UGC diffusion. This study also had important management implications for platform managers to design effective product strategies to increase UGC diffusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li, H., Liu, Y.: Understanding post-adoption behaviors of e-service users in the context of online travel services. Inf. Manag. 51(8), 1043–1052 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, K., Evgeniou, T., Padmanabhan, V., Richard, E.: Content contributor management and network effects in a ugc environment. Mark. Sci. 31(3), 433–447 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu-Thompkins, Y., Rogerson, M.: Rising to stardom: an empirical investigation of the diffusion of user-generated content. J. Interact. Mark. 26(2), 71–82 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Presi, C., Saridakis, C., Hartmans, S.: User-generated content behaviour of the dissatisfied service customer. Eur. J. Mark. 48(9/10), 1600–1625 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luo, Z., Osborne, M., Tang, J., Wang, T.: Who will retweet me?: finding retweeters in Twitter, pp. 869–872 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., Chi, E.H.: Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network. In: IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing, pp. 177–184. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, Z., Guo, J., Cai, K., Tang, J., Li, J., Zhang, L., et al.: Understanding retweeting behaviors in social networks. In: ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1633–1636. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gomez-Rodriguez, M., Leskovec, J., Krause, A.: Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. ACM Knowl. Discov. Data Min. 5, 1019–1028 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lerman, K., Ghosh, R.: Information contagion: an empirical study of the spread of news on Digg and Twitter social networks. Comput. Sci. 52, 166–176 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harrigan, N., Achananuparp, P., Lim, E.P.: Influentials, novelty, and social contagion: the viral power of average friends, close communities, and old news. Soc. Netw. 34(4), 470–480 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Starbird, K., Palen, L.: (How) Will the revolution be retweeted?: information diffusion and the 2011 egyptian uprising, pp. 7–16. DBLP (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, M., Kim, H., Kim, O.: Why do people retweet a Tweet?: altruistic, egoistic, and reciprocity motivations for retweeting. Psychologia 58(4), 189–201 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.B.: What is Twitter, a social network or news media?. In: International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 591–600 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Borgatti, S.P., Mehra, A., Brass, D.J., Labianca, G.: Network analysis in the social sciences. Sciences 323(5916), 892 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cross, R., Cummings, J.N.: Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Acad. Manag. J. 47(6), 928–937 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Soda, G., Usai, A., Zaheer, A.: Network memory: the influence of past and current networks on performance. Acad. Manag. J. 47(6), 893–906 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nerkar, A., Paruchuri, S.: Evolution of R & D capabilities: the role of knowledge networks within a firm. Manag. Sci. 51(5), 771–785 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sparrowe, R.T., Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J.: Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Manag. J. 44(2), 316–325 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Iacobucci, D., Hopkins, N.: Modeling dyadic interactions and networks in marketing. J. Mark. Res. 29(1), 5–17 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rindfleisch, A., Moorman, C.: The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: a strength-of-ties perspective. J. Mark. 65(2), 1–18 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Antia, K.D., Frazier, G.L.: The severity of contract enforcement in interfirm channel relationships. J. Mark. 65(4), 67–81 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Janssen, M.A., Jager, W.: Simulating market dynamics: interactions between consumer psychology and social networks. Artif. Life. 9(4), 343–356 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kozinets, R.V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A.C., Wilner, S.J.: Networked narratives: understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. J. Mark. 74(2), 71–89 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stringer, C.: Modern human origins: progress and prospects. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 357(1420), 563–579 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McKenna, K.Y., Bargh, J.A.: Causes and consequences of social interaction on the internet: a conceptual framework. Media Psychol. 1(3), 249–269 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wellman, B., Gulia, M.: Virtual communities as communities. Commun. Cybersp. 167–194 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stephen, A.T., Zubcsek, P.P., Goldenberg, J.: Lower connectivity is better: the effects of network structure on customer innovativeness in interdependent ideation tasks. Soc. Sci. Electron. Publ. 53(2), 263–279 (2015). 150619065151001

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sohn, D.: Disentangling the effects of social network density on Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM) intention. J. Comput.-Med. Commun. 14(2), 352–367 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Berger, J., Milkman, K.L.: What makes online content viral? J. Mark. Res. 49(8), 192–205 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Workman, M.: New media and the changing face of information technology use: the importance of task pursuit, social influence, and experience. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31(1), 111–117 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ahn, D.Y., Duan, J.A., Mela, C.F.: Managing user-generated content: a dynamic rational expectations equilibrium approach. Mark. Sci. 35(2), 284–303 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Marett, K., Joshi, K.D.: The decision to share information and rumors: examining the role of motivation in an online discussion forum. Nucl. Phys. A 24(1), 47–68 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, P.K.: Measuring user influence in Twitter: the million follower fallacy. In: International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2010, Washington, DC, USA, May, vol. 14. DBLP (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wu, F., Huberman, B.A.: Novelty and collective attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(45), 17599–17601 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xingyu Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, X., Wang, Y., Hu, X., Zhou, Z. (2019). The Moderating Roles of Network Density and Redundancy in Lurking Behavior on User-Generated-Content Online Communities. In: Ahram, T. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 787. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94229-2_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics