Skip to main content

The Development of an Innovative Corneal Biopsy Tool: A Usability Comparison of Four Ergonomic Handle Prototypes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare and Medical Devices (AHFE 2018)

Abstract

Keratitis, or an inflammation of the cornea, is a common eye disease in which a biopsy of the cornea is required to determine its underlying cause. Currently, no standardized tool is available for this purpose and corneal scrapings are performed with a scalpel or wide needle, frequently with inconclusive results as too little material is removed for fear of penetration. Previous research resulted in a new cutting principle, and is used in this follow-up study. The aim of this research is to optimize the usability of the cutting principle through a user evaluation (N = 18) of four ergonomic handle prototypes. The results of this study suggest that a forceps-shaped handle provides improved usability, and propose design guidelines for further optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Streilein, J.W., Dana, M.R., Ksander, B.R.: Immunity causing blindness: five different paths to herpes stromal keratitis. Immunol. Today 18(9), 443–449 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yu, M.C.Z., Höfling-Lima, A.L., Furtado, G.H.C., Yu, M.C.Z., Höfling-Lima, A.L., Furtado, G.H.C.: Microbiological and epidemiological study of infectious keratitis in children and adolescents. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 79(5), 289–293 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Veelaert, L., et al.: Usefulness of skin punch tools for corneal biopsy, vol. 590 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gorski, M., Genis, A., Yushvayev, S., Awwad, A., Lazzaro, D.R.: Seasonal variation in the presentation of infectious keratitis. Eye Contact Lens Sci. Clin. Pract. 42(5), 295–297 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh, D., Verma, A.: Fungal Keratitis: Background, Pathophysiology, Epidemiology. MedScape (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibrahim, Y., Boase, D., Cree, I.: Incidence of infectious corneal ulcers, portsmouth study, UK. J. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 3(5) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Townsend, N., Dunbar, M.T.: The right approach. the diagnosis and the treatment rules for infectious cornea ulcers. Optom. Manag. 49, 22, 25, 42 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daschner, F.: Leitsätze der Antibiotikatherapie. In: Antibiotika am Krankenbett, pp. 15–18. Springer Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Wenzel, M., Schrage, N.F.: Diagnostik bei Hornhauterkrankungen. In: Kampik, A., Grehn, F, pp. 37–50 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Callegan, M.C., O’Callaghan, R.J., Hill, J.M.: Pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of bacterial keratitis. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 27(2), 129–149 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedlaender, M.H.: Corneal biopsy. Int. Ophthalmol. Clin. 28(2), 101–102 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Newton, C., Moore, M.B., Kaufman, H.E.: Corneal biopsy in chronic keratitis. Arch. Ophthalmol. 105(4), 577–578, April 1987. (Chicago, Ill. 1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Whitehouse, G., Reid, K., Hudson, B., Lennox, V.A., Lawless, M.A.: Corneal biopsy in microbial keratitis. Aust. N. Z. J. Ophthalmol. 19(3), 193–196 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berguer, R., Forkey, D.L., Smith, W.D.: Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg. Endosc. 13(5), 466–468 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berguer, R.: Surgery and ergonomics. Arch. Surg. 134(9), 1011–1016 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Berguer, R.: The application of ergonomics in the work environment of general surgeons. Rev. Environ. Health 12(2), 99–106 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matern, U., Eichenlaub, M., Waller, P., Rückauer, K.D.: MIS instruments: an experimental comparison of various ergonomic handles and their design. Surg. Endosc. 13(8), 756–762 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Veelen, M.A., Meijer, D.W.: Ergonomics and design of laparoscopic instruments: results of a survey among laparoscopic surgeons. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 9(6), 481–489 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Veelen, M.A., Meijer, D.W., Goossens, R.H.M., Snijders, C.J., Jakimowicz, J.J.: Improved usability of a new handle design for laparoscopic dissection forceps. Surg. Endosc. Other Interv. Tech. 16(1), 201–207 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Berguer, R., Gerber, S., Kilpatrick, G., Beckley, D.: An ergonomic comparison of in-line vs pistol-grip handle configuration in a laparoscopic grasper. Surg. Endosc. 12(6), 805–808 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Matern, U., Waller, P.: Instruments for minimally invasive surgery: new technology principles of ergonomic handles, pp. 174–182 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Daams, B.J.: Productergonomie. Ontwerpen voor nut, gebruik en beleving. Deel 2a. Uitgeverij Undesigning (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sancibrian, R., Gutierrez-Diez, M.C., Torre-Ferrero, C., Benito-Gonzalez, M.A., Redondo-Figuero, C., Manuel-Palazuelos, J.C.: Design and evaluation of a new ergonomic handle for instruments in minimally invasive surgery. J. Surg. Res. 188(1), 88–99 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sanders, M.S., McCormick, E.J.: Human Factors in Engineering and Design (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is the result of a collaborative research between the Department of Ophthalmology (UZA), Centre for Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine (Ophthalmology/Vaxinfectio – UA/UZA) and the Department of Product Development (UA) together with the industrial partner D.O.R.C. Additionally, we want to acknowledge all students contributing to this publication within the course of Applied Research Methods at Product Development, University of Antwerp.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lore Veelaert , Muriel De Boeck or Erik Haring .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Veelaert, L., De Boeck, M., Haring, E., Dhubhghaill, S.N., Koppen, C., De Bruyne, G. (2019). The Development of an Innovative Corneal Biopsy Tool: A Usability Comparison of Four Ergonomic Handle Prototypes. In: Lightner, N. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare and Medical Devices. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 779. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94373-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics