Skip to main content

Segmentation and Stillness Make Human Checks Secure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 778))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1030 Accesses

Abstract

The best condition for human to check is that everything is staying at its normal position designated beforehand. Under such circumstance, the checker does not feel time pressure, since nothing is in motion. In addition, the check itself becomes easy; the checker is only required to compare actual positions of things with their regular positions. Although the merit of checking under stillness is a matter of course, we find many bad practices of check under motion in real workplaces today. To realize the best condition, collect segmentation of workflow is required, and it may not be so trivial. This article discusses reason of the merits, design method of workflow segmentation, and actual successful examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Knight, J.C., Leveson, N.G.: An experimental evaluation of the assumption of independence in multiversion programming. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 12(1), 96–109 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. US Department of Energy: Crisis Contained – Department of Energy at Three Mile lsland, US Department of Energy (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nassi, I., Shneiderman, B.: Flowchart techniques for structured programming. In: SIGPLAN Notices XII (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Von Neumann, J.: The role of high and of extremely high complication. In: Von Neumann, J.: Theory of Self-reproducing Automata. University of Illinois Press (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunlap, J.W.: Men and machines. J. Appl. Psychol. 31(6), 565–579 (1947)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toru Nakata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nakata, T. (2019). Segmentation and Stillness Make Human Checks Secure. In: Boring, R. (eds) Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 778. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94391-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94391-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94390-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94391-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics