Skip to main content

High Reliability Organisation (HRO) Principles of Collective Mindfulness: An Opportunity to Improve Construction Safety Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 791))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The construction industry remains a high-risk industry, because of high fatality rates worldwide. Most construction accidents result from interaction between the work team, workplace, equipment and materials which lead to about 70% of injuries and fatalities. A wide range of safety management approaches have been implemented to manage construction risks, and they have been successful in reducing lost time injuries and incidents. However, a number of safety management approaches currently used in the industry have not kept pace with emerging theory on accident causation, prevention and safety management. To minimise accidents more advanced approaches and methods are required, and one of such methods is High Reliability Organisation (HRO) principles of collective mindfulness. This paper presents a systematic review of HRO research published in construction from 1990–2017. This review aims to identify the possibilities and barriers associated with transferring HRO principles to construction activities. Key findings from seven articles are discussed, research gaps identified and primary outcomes from the data will be presented descriptively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Roberts, K.H.: Some charateristics of high-reliability organizations. Organ. Sci. 1(2), 160–177 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Safe Work Australia: Fatality statistics by industry 2017. https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/statistics-and-research/statistics/fatalities/fatality-statistics-industry. Cited 9 June 2017

  3. Mitropoulos, P., Cupido, G.: Safety as an emergent property: investigation into the work practices of high-reliability framing crews. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 135(5), 407–415 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Waterson, P., et al.: Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical system and safety. Ergonomics 58, 1–35 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harvey, E.J., Patrick, W., Dainty, A.R.J.: Applying HRO and resilience engineering to construction: Barriers and opportunities. Safety Science (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pinto, A.N., Isabel, L.: Ribeiro, Rita A., Occupational risk assessment in construction industry – Overview and reflection. Saf. Sci. 49(5), 616–624 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ai Group: Australia’s Construction Industry: Profile and Outlook, July 2015, Australia (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Australia, S.W. Construction Industry Profile 2015. https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/doc/construction-industry-profile. Cited 14 June 2017

  9. DATAUSA: Construction data (2018). https://datausa.io/profile/naics/23/. Cited 30 January 2018

  10. Toole, T.M.: Construction site safety roles. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 128(3), 203–210 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mroszczyk, J.W.: Improving construction safety: a team effort. Prof. Saf. 60(6), 55–68 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Beyea, S.C.: High reliability theory and highly reliable organizations. AORN J. 81(6), 1319–1322 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perrow, C.: Organizing to reduce the vulnerabilities of complexity. J. Conting. Crisis Manag. 7(3), 150–155 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hopkins, A.: The problem of defining high reliability organisations. ANU College of Asia and the Pacific (2007). http://regnet.anu.edu.au/research/publications/3041/wp-51-problem-defining-high-reliability-organisations. Cited 14 May 2017

  15. Sutcliffe, K.M.: High reliability organizations (HROs). Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 25, 133–144 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Weick, K.E.S., Sutcliffe, K.M., Obstfeld, D.: Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness. Crisis Manag. 3(1), 81–123 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hales, D.N.C., Satya, S.: Creating high reliability organizations using mindfulness. J. Bus. Res. 69(8), 2873–2881 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weick, K., Kathleen, M.: Managing the Unexpected -Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. Jossey-Bass (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Høyland, S.A., Skotnes, R.Ø., Holte, K.A.: An empirical exploration of the presence of HRO safety principles across the health care sector and construction industry in Norway. Safety Science (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moher, D., et al.: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int. J. Surg. 8(5), 336–341 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. CASP: CASP (Qualitative Research Checklist) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. olde Scholtenhuis, L.L., Doree, A.G.: Welcoming high reliability organising in construction management. In: 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, ARCOM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pillay, M.: Progressing zero harm: a review of theory and applications for advancing health and safety management in construction. Achieving Sustainable Construction Health and Safety (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. olde Scholtenhuis, L.L., Dorée, A.G.: High reliability organizing at the boundary of the CM domain. Constr. Manag. Econ. 32(78), 658–664 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Koh, T.Y., Tuuli, M.M., Rowlinson, S.: A relational approach to high reliability organising for construction project safety: a conceptual framework. In: Proceedings of the 29th ARCOM Conference, Association of Researchers in Construction Management (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge funding provided by The University of Newcastle Australia [International Postgraduate Scholarship (UNIPRS) and University of Newcastle Research Scholarship Central 50:50 (UNRSC5050) scheme] for the first author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Enya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Enya, A., Dempsey, S., Pillay, M. (2019). High Reliability Organisation (HRO) Principles of Collective Mindfulness: An Opportunity to Improve Construction Safety Management. In: Arezes, P. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 791. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94588-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94589-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics