Skip to main content

Comparative Study of the Application of RCM and Risk Matrix for Risk Assessment of Collaborative Robots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 791))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1969 Accesses

Abstract

This paper is focused on the study and analysis of risks associated with collaborative robots. Currently, collaborative robots are in full development with application in different sectors of activity. However, for these new working situations the adoption of suitable risk assessment approaches is necessary to deal with all new parameters and risks generated by the collaborative work involving a machine and human beings.

In this sense, it is important to assess the risks associated with the use of this type of machines, and different methodology of risk assessment can be used in these new and complex cases.

A comparative study of two risk assessment methodologies was carried out to evaluate their suitability for risk management and thus to support the manufacturers and users of these machines in the use of appropriate and reliable risk assessment methodologies. The two methodologies, Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) and Risk Matrix, and the quality of the results obtained by their application are compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fonseca, A., Pires, C.: Human robots interactions: mechanical safety data for physical contacts. In: Savage-Knepshield, P., Chen, J. (eds.) Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 499, pp. 305–313. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. ISO/TR 14121:2012 - Safety of Machinery - Risk Assessment - Part 2: Practical Guidance and Examples of Methods

    Google Scholar 

  3. ISO 13849:2015 - Safety of Machinery - Safety-Related Parts of Control Systems - Part 1: General Principles for Design

    Google Scholar 

  4. ISO 13849:2012 - Safety of Machinery - Safety-Related Parts of Control Systems - Part 2: Validation

    Google Scholar 

  5. ISO 12100:2010 - Safety of Machinery - General Principles for Design - Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISO 14120:2002 - Safety of Machinery. Guards - General Requirements for the Design and Construction of Fixed and Movable Guards

    Google Scholar 

  7. ISO/TS 15066:2016 - Robots and Robotic Devices - Safety Requirements for Industrial Robots—Collaborative Operation

    Google Scholar 

  8. SAE JA 1012:2011 - A Guide to the Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) Standard

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO 13482:2014 - Robots and Robotic Devices - Safety Requirements for Personal Care Robots

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vemula, B.R., Ramteen, M., Spampinato, G., Fagerström, B.: Human-robot impact model: for safety assessment of collaborative robot design. In: IEEE International Symposium on Robotics and Intelligent Sensors, Canada (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ogorodnikov, O.: Methodology of Safety for a Human Robot Interaction Designing Stage. IEEE, Poland (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan, J.T.C., Duan, F., Kato, R., Arai, T.: Safety Strategy for human–robot collaboration: design and development in cellular manufacturing. Adv. Robot. 24, 839–860 (2010). Japan

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on the study of a robot in an automotive industry. The authors would like to thank the stakeholders for all the support and interest shown in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Pires .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fonseca, A., Pires, C., Lopes, I. (2019). Comparative Study of the Application of RCM and Risk Matrix for Risk Assessment of Collaborative Robots. In: Arezes, P. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 791. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94588-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94589-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics