Abstract
Calculation of the probability of occurrence of an accident involving an industrial machine such as a metal bending press requires knowledge of the failure rates. Specifically, what is needed are the failure rate of the protective device and, the failure rate associated with the human action consisting in having one’s hands between the press dies while the operator is bending a part. The first data could, in principle be obtained from the manufacturer of the device. However, in reality, this data involves knowledge of the reliability of not only the protective device but also of the associated command circuitry. In reality, such data may be difficult to obtain. Also, many important statistics relating to human performance are not collected by workplaces. So, another way to obtain the data is through expert elicitation, that is consulting people knowledgeable with the problem at hand and asking them to estimate, based on their judgement, the probabilities or failure rates that are sought. This process is often used in the literature but is seldom described in detail. In this paper, expert elicitation is used and described in order to gather relevant data for the purpose of probability estimation. Thus, eight bending press operators in a large manufacturing plant, the health and safety coordinator as well as the workers’ supervisor were solicited.
A questionnaire was handed to them consisting of a set of brief instructions followed by three questions which were provided with multiple possible qualitative probability estimates to choose from. In order to improve the quality of the probability estimates, the suggested probabilities were associated with typical accidental events which serve as a comparison basis for the participants. A general introduction was given by the author to the participants in a group meeting on the shop floor which consisted of presentation the research project, its purpose. The questions and the choice of answers were read and explained to the group. The questionnaire was then handed to them. The whole process took little time to complete. These estimates represent the experts’ estimates of the probability of occurrence of the events in question, expressed in linguistic, qualitative terms. These estimates were translated in quantitative terms through fuzzy logic technique. More specifically, a scale composed of qualitative statements and their corresponding triangular fuzzy number was established with two main simple guiding principles in mind. Firstly, the scale should reflect the probability scales found in often-used safety standards. Secondly, the fuzzy triangular numbers should not overlap so that there is no need to invert any of their components as required by the rules of fuzzy number arithmetic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Knol, et al.: The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure. Environ Health 9, 19 (2010)
Knol, A.B., et al.: Expert elicitation on ultrafine particles: likelihood of health effects and causal pathways. Part Fibre Toxicol 6, 19 (2009)
Acosta, H.: Fuzzy experts on recreational vessels, a risk modelling approach for marine invasions. Ecol Modell 221(5), 850–863 (2010)
Yuhua, D., Datao, Y.: Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 18, 83–88 (2005)
Renjith, V.R., et al.: Two-dimensional fuzzy fault tree analysis for chlorine release from a chlor-alkali industry using expert elicitation. J. Hazard. Mater. 183, 103–110 (2010)
Purba, J.H., et al.: A fuzzy reliability assessment of basic events of fault trees through qualitative data processing. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 243, 50–69 (2014)
Apeland, S., et al.: Quantifying uncertainty under a predictive, epistemic approach. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 75(1), 93–102 (2002)
Kruger, T., et al.: The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling. Environ. Model Softw. 36, 4–18 (2012)
Ferraro, D.O.: Fuzzy knowledge-based model for soil condition assessment in Argentinean cropping systems. Environ. Model Softw. 24(3), 359–370 (2009)
Page, T.: Eliciting fuzzy distributions from experts for ranking conceptual risk model components. Environ. Model. Softw. 36, 19–34 (2012)
Wang, D., et al.: Fuzzy fault tree analysis for fire and explosion of crude oil tanks. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2, 1390–1398 (2013)
Lavasini, S.M., et al.: An extension to Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA) application in petrochemical process industry. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 93, 75–88 (2015)
Gierczak, M.: The quantitative risk assessment of MINI, MIDI and MAXI Horizontal Directional Drilling Projects applying Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 43, 67–77 (2014)
Jefarian, E., Rezvani, M.A.: (?) Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis for evaluation of railway safety risks: an evaluation of root causes for passenger train derailment. Proc. IMechE 226(Part F): J. Rail Rapid Transit. 14–25
Department of Defense USA. (1993) MIL-STD-882D Standard Practice for System Safety
Acknowledgment
The authors acknowledge financial support from ÉREST.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Venditti, T., Tran, N.D.P., Ngo, A.D. (2019). Expert Elicitation Methodology in the Risk Analysis of an Industrial Machine. In: Arezes, P. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 791. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94588-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94589-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)