Skip to main content

Expert Elicitation Methodology in the Risk Analysis of an Industrial Machine

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 791))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1901 Accesses

Abstract

Calculation of the probability of occurrence of an accident involving an industrial machine such as a metal bending press requires knowledge of the failure rates. Specifically, what is needed are the failure rate of the protective device and, the failure rate associated with the human action consisting in having one’s hands between the press dies while the operator is bending a part. The first data could, in principle be obtained from the manufacturer of the device. However, in reality, this data involves knowledge of the reliability of not only the protective device but also of the associated command circuitry. In reality, such data may be difficult to obtain. Also, many important statistics relating to human performance are not collected by workplaces. So, another way to obtain the data is through expert elicitation, that is consulting people knowledgeable with the problem at hand and asking them to estimate, based on their judgement, the probabilities or failure rates that are sought. This process is often used in the literature but is seldom described in detail. In this paper, expert elicitation is used and described in order to gather relevant data for the purpose of probability estimation. Thus, eight bending press operators in a large manufacturing plant, the health and safety coordinator as well as the workers’ supervisor were solicited.

A questionnaire was handed to them consisting of a set of brief instructions followed by three questions which were provided with multiple possible qualitative probability estimates to choose from. In order to improve the quality of the probability estimates, the suggested probabilities were associated with typical accidental events which serve as a comparison basis for the participants. A general introduction was given by the author to the participants in a group meeting on the shop floor which consisted of presentation the research project, its purpose. The questions and the choice of answers were read and explained to the group. The questionnaire was then handed to them. The whole process took little time to complete. These estimates represent the experts’ estimates of the probability of occurrence of the events in question, expressed in linguistic, qualitative terms. These estimates were translated in quantitative terms through fuzzy logic technique. More specifically, a scale composed of qualitative statements and their corresponding triangular fuzzy number was established with two main simple guiding principles in mind. Firstly, the scale should reflect the probability scales found in often-used safety standards. Secondly, the fuzzy triangular numbers should not overlap so that there is no need to invert any of their components as required by the rules of fuzzy number arithmetic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Knol, et al.: The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure. Environ Health 9, 19 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Knol, A.B., et al.: Expert elicitation on ultrafine particles: likelihood of health effects and causal pathways. Part Fibre Toxicol 6, 19 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Acosta, H.: Fuzzy experts on recreational vessels, a risk modelling approach for marine invasions. Ecol Modell 221(5), 850–863 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yuhua, D., Datao, Y.: Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 18, 83–88 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Renjith, V.R., et al.: Two-dimensional fuzzy fault tree analysis for chlorine release from a chlor-alkali industry using expert elicitation. J. Hazard. Mater. 183, 103–110 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Purba, J.H., et al.: A fuzzy reliability assessment of basic events of fault trees through qualitative data processing. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 243, 50–69 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Apeland, S., et al.: Quantifying uncertainty under a predictive, epistemic approach. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 75(1), 93–102 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kruger, T., et al.: The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling. Environ. Model Softw. 36, 4–18 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferraro, D.O.: Fuzzy knowledge-based model for soil condition assessment in Argentinean cropping systems. Environ. Model Softw. 24(3), 359–370 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Page, T.: Eliciting fuzzy distributions from experts for ranking conceptual risk model components. Environ. Model. Softw. 36, 19–34 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, D., et al.: Fuzzy fault tree analysis for fire and explosion of crude oil tanks. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2, 1390–1398 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lavasini, S.M., et al.: An extension to Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA) application in petrochemical process industry. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 93, 75–88 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gierczak, M.: The quantitative risk assessment of MINI, MIDI and MAXI Horizontal Directional Drilling Projects applying Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 43, 67–77 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jefarian, E., Rezvani, M.A.: (?) Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis for evaluation of railway safety risks: an evaluation of root causes for passenger train derailment. Proc. IMechE 226(Part F): J. Rail Rapid Transit. 14–25

    Google Scholar 

  15. Department of Defense USA. (1993) MIL-STD-882D Standard Practice for System Safety

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge financial support from ÉREST.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Venditti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Venditti, T., Tran, N.D.P., Ngo, A.D. (2019). Expert Elicitation Methodology in the Risk Analysis of an Industrial Machine. In: Arezes, P. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 791. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94588-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94589-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics