Skip to main content

Measure Evaluation Tool MET: Promoting Safety by Optimizing the Human Scope of Action

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 791))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2024 Accesses

Abstract

Safety Management Systems (SMS) normally base on the assumption that safety can be guaranteed through a prescription of a one-best-way of activity performance. Any deviation from this one-best-way is considered a violation. Main objective of safety measures is therefore to eliminate variability in human performance. A more comprehensive safety perspective recognizes that the operating conditions under which activities must be performed are never ideal. The human ability to adapt performance depending on the current situation is consequently considered a strength that should be supported in order to enhance safety. The possibility to deploy this strength should therefore be guaranteed. For this purpose, a safety tool – the Measure Evaluation Tool (MET) – that supports the definition of an appropriate human scope of action was developed. This is following presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO): Safety Management Manual (SMM). Doc 9859 AN/474. ICAO, Montreal (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eurocontrol: From Safety-I to Safety-II. A White Paper. Eurocontrol, Brussels (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hollnagel, E.: Safety-I and Safety II. The Past and the Future of Safety Management. Ashgate, Farnham (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, T.J.: Human Error and Performance Variability. In: Smith, T.J., Henning, R., Wade, M.G., Fisher, T. (eds.) Variability in Human Performance, pp. 153--178. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hollnagel, E.: The ETTO Principle: Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off. Why Things That Go Right Sometimes Go Wrong. Ashgate, Farnham (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hollnagel, E.: FRAM. The Functional Resonance Analysis Method. Ashgate, Farnham (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors like to thank the Federal Office of Civil Aviation in Switzerland for the financial support of the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toni Waefler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Waefler, T., Nisoli, G., Gugerli, R. (2019). Measure Evaluation Tool MET: Promoting Safety by Optimizing the Human Scope of Action. In: Arezes, P. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 791. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94588-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94589-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics