Skip to main content

From Industrial Design Education to Practice: Creating Discipline Through Design Sprints

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 790))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper looks into the value of design sprints as a means to training industrial design students towards practice within industry through the analysis of five consecutive years of design sprints with 280 interdisciplinary student teams of engineering, business students, and industrial design students. In the past several years, several design schools and many companies utilize the methodology of design sprints through human-centered design. This interdisciplinary ‘time boxed exercise’ is meant to rapidly focus product innovation to drive more valuable outcomes for the user; however, the design sprint also has considerable benefits towards teaching and ‘disciplining’ students for the work they will later engage in professional practice. Our results reveal three highly significant contributions of design sprints to aid students towards transitioning to professional practice including: (1) aiding towards working through design fixation, (2) creating ambiguity that leads to heightened innovation, and (3) making linkages between digital collaboration (what most students know well) and in-person collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bergin, J.: Fourteen Pedagogical Patterns. EuroPLoP, pp. 1–49 (2000). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.415.1861&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  2. Bergin, J., Marquardt, K., Manns, M.L., Eckstein, J., Sharp, H., Wallingford, E.: Patterns for experiential learning. Learning, p. 477, 25 November 2002

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonwell, C.C., Eison, J.A.: Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183 (1991). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf

  4. Shulman, L.S.: Signature pedagogies in the professions. Dædalus 134(3), 52–59 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brandt, C., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., Reimer, Y.: A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 23, 329–348 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Keijzer-Broers, W.J., de Reuver, M.: Applying agile design sprint methods in action design research: prototyping a health and wellbeing platform. In: International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems, pp. 68–80. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rover, D., Ullerich, C., Scheel, R., Wegter, J., Whipple, C.: Advantages of agile methodologies for software and product development in a capstone design project. In: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–9. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dean, J.H., Van Bossuyt, D.: Breaking the tyranny of the semester: a phase-gate sprint approach to teaching Colorado school of mines students important engineering concepts, delivering useful solutions to communities, and working on long time scale projects. Int. J. Serv. Learn. Eng. 9, 222–239 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sarang-Sieminski, A., Christianson, R.: Agile/scrum for capstone project management. In: Capstone Design Conference, Columbus, Ohio (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scrum.org: A Better Way of Building Products. https://www.scrum.org/resources/what-is-scrum

  11. Google Dictionary (2018). https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=agile+definition&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

  12. Jongerius, P., Berghuis, G.: Get Agile. Scrum for UX, Design & Development. BIS Publishers, Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scruminc: What is Timeboxing. https://www.scruminc.com/what-is-timeboxing/

  14. GV. https://www.gv.com

  15. Banfield, R., Lombardo, C.T., Wax, T.: Design Sprint: A Practical Guidebook for Building Great Digital Products. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. GV Portfolio. https://www.gv.com/portfolio/

  17. Nykänen, A., Wingstedt, J., Sundhage, J., Mohlin, P.: Sketching sounds–kinds of listening and their functions in designing. Des. Stud. 39, 19–47 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. School of Design Sprint. https://www.schoolofdesignsprint.com

  19. Udacity: https://www.udacity.com/course/design-sprint-foundations–nd201?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI7ZT3zv7T2QIVm4uzCh08fAgfEAAYASAAEgIdVfD_BwE

  20. Design Sprint School. http://www.designsprintschool.com

  21. Thoughtbot. https://thoughtbot.com/product-design-sprint/guide

  22. Board of Innovation: https://www.boardofinnovation.com/design-sprint/

  23. Jokela, T., Tahkokallio, P.: aRCtIC DeSIGN Week: A forum and a catalyst. Relate North, p. 118 (2015). https://lauda.ulapland.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/62276/Relate_North_Art,_Heritage_Identity_pdfA.pdf?sequence=2#page=119

  24. Knudson, J., Ramanathan A., Carter, A., O’Day, J.: Fostering Innovation: How User-Centered Design Can Help Us Get the Local Control Funding Formula Right. Policy and Practice Brief. California Collaborative on District Reform (2017). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578916.pdf

  25. Ulster, R.: 8 Steps to Implementing Design Thinking in Your Classroom, 25 July 2016. https://www.commonsense.org/education/blog/8-steps-to-implementing-design-thinking-in-your-classroom

  26. Zheng, C., Do, E.Y.L., Budd, J.: Joinery: parametric joint generation for laser cut assemblies. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, pp. 63–74. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Guzman, O.: Design Sprint in an educational context (2016). https://sprintstories.com/first-design-sprint-in-an-educational-context-c34b59eabf8d

  28. van Ploos Amstel, D., Heemskerk, M., Jan Renes, R., Hermsen, S.: The value of agile methods in designing for behavioural change a case study. Des. J. 20(1), 681–690 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas, J., Shin, C.: Implementing design sprints in the education of industrial designers. Des. Princ. Pract. Int. J. – Ann. Rev. 10, 59–73 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shin, C., Thomas, J.: Exploring the emotional experience of the user and designer, both in the design process and classroom. Procedia Manuf. 3, 2267–2274 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shin, C., Thomas, J.: Exploring two design processes: slow and fast. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 3–15. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nørgård, R.T., Morgan, J.: Game-centric pedagogy and curriculums in higher education. In: 29th International Academic Conference, Rome, 05 April 2017

    Google Scholar 

  33. Feldhusen, J., Brezing, A., Bungert, F., Lower, M., Yim, H., Lee, K.: An interuniversitary education concept for collaborative product development. In: The 10th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education DS 46: Proceedings of E&PDE 2008, Barcelona, Spain, 04–05 September 2008

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ovesen, N., Eriksen, K., Tollestrup, C.: Speeding up development activities in student projects with time boxing and scrum. In: The 13th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education DS 69, Proceedings of E&PDE 2011, London, UK, 08–09 September 2011

    Google Scholar 

  35. Grimheden, M.E.: Can agile methods enhance mechatronics design education? Mechatronics 23(8), 967–973 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yim, H., Feldhusen, J., Bungert, F., Brezing, A., Lee, K., Löwer, M., Jee, H., Kim, B.: Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Collaborative Product Design Education Concept (N.D.) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Crilly, N.: ‘Fixation’ and ‘the pivot’: balancing persistence with flexibility in design and entrepreneurship. Int. J. Des. Creat. Innov. 6(1–2), 52–65 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2017.1362359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Strickfaden, M., Heylighen, A., Rodgers, P., Neuckermans, H.: Untangling the culture medium of student designs. CoDesign 2(2), 97–107 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cardoso, C., Badke-Schaub, P.: Fixation or inspiration: creative problem solving in design. J. Creat. Behav. 45(2), 77–82 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Linsey, J.S., Tseng, I., Fu, K., Cagan, J., Wood, K.L., Schunn, C.: A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. J. Mech. Des. 132(4), 041003 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues 8(2), 5–21 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Cross, N.: Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ecker, C., Stacey, M., Earl, C.: Ambiguity is a double-edged sword: similarity references in communication. Design Society (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stacey, M., Eckert, C.: Against ambiguity. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW) 12(2), 153–183 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. Horizon 9(5), 1–6 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Parsons, J., Taylor, L.: Improving student engagement. Curr. Issues Educ. 14(1), 4–32 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Carlson, S., Gadio, C.T.: Teacher professional development in the use of technology. In: Haddad, W.D., Draxler, A. (eds.) Technologies for Education: Potentials, Parameters and Prospects, pp. 118–132. AED/UNESCO, Washington, DC/Paris (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joyce Thomas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Thomas, J., Strickfaden, M. (2019). From Industrial Design Education to Practice: Creating Discipline Through Design Sprints. In: Chung, W., Shin, C. (eds) Advances in Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 790. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94601-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94601-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94600-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94601-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics