Abstract
This paper looks into the value of design sprints as a means to training industrial design students towards practice within industry through the analysis of five consecutive years of design sprints with 280 interdisciplinary student teams of engineering, business students, and industrial design students. In the past several years, several design schools and many companies utilize the methodology of design sprints through human-centered design. This interdisciplinary ‘time boxed exercise’ is meant to rapidly focus product innovation to drive more valuable outcomes for the user; however, the design sprint also has considerable benefits towards teaching and ‘disciplining’ students for the work they will later engage in professional practice. Our results reveal three highly significant contributions of design sprints to aid students towards transitioning to professional practice including: (1) aiding towards working through design fixation, (2) creating ambiguity that leads to heightened innovation, and (3) making linkages between digital collaboration (what most students know well) and in-person collaboration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bergin, J.: Fourteen Pedagogical Patterns. EuroPLoP, pp. 1–49 (2000). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.415.1861&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Bergin, J., Marquardt, K., Manns, M.L., Eckstein, J., Sharp, H., Wallingford, E.: Patterns for experiential learning. Learning, p. 477, 25 November 2002
Bonwell, C.C., Eison, J.A.: Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183 (1991). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf
Shulman, L.S.: Signature pedagogies in the professions. Dædalus 134(3), 52–59 (2005)
Brandt, C., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., Reimer, Y.: A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 23, 329–348 (2013)
Keijzer-Broers, W.J., de Reuver, M.: Applying agile design sprint methods in action design research: prototyping a health and wellbeing platform. In: International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems, pp. 68–80. Springer, Cham (2016)
Rover, D., Ullerich, C., Scheel, R., Wegter, J., Whipple, C.: Advantages of agile methodologies for software and product development in a capstone design project. In: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–9. IEEE (2014)
Dean, J.H., Van Bossuyt, D.: Breaking the tyranny of the semester: a phase-gate sprint approach to teaching Colorado school of mines students important engineering concepts, delivering useful solutions to communities, and working on long time scale projects. Int. J. Serv. Learn. Eng. 9, 222–239 (2014)
Sarang-Sieminski, A., Christianson, R.: Agile/scrum for capstone project management. In: Capstone Design Conference, Columbus, Ohio (2016)
Scrum.org: A Better Way of Building Products. https://www.scrum.org/resources/what-is-scrum
Google Dictionary (2018). https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=agile+definition&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
Jongerius, P., Berghuis, G.: Get Agile. Scrum for UX, Design & Development. BIS Publishers, Amsterdam (2012)
Scruminc: What is Timeboxing. https://www.scruminc.com/what-is-timeboxing/
Banfield, R., Lombardo, C.T., Wax, T.: Design Sprint: A Practical Guidebook for Building Great Digital Products. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol (2015)
GV Portfolio. https://www.gv.com/portfolio/
Nykänen, A., Wingstedt, J., Sundhage, J., Mohlin, P.: Sketching sounds–kinds of listening and their functions in designing. Des. Stud. 39, 19–47 (2015)
School of Design Sprint. https://www.schoolofdesignsprint.com
Design Sprint School. http://www.designsprintschool.com
Thoughtbot. https://thoughtbot.com/product-design-sprint/guide
Board of Innovation: https://www.boardofinnovation.com/design-sprint/
Jokela, T., Tahkokallio, P.: aRCtIC DeSIGN Week: A forum and a catalyst. Relate North, p. 118 (2015). https://lauda.ulapland.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/62276/Relate_North_Art,_Heritage_Identity_pdfA.pdf?sequence=2#page=119
Knudson, J., Ramanathan A., Carter, A., O’Day, J.: Fostering Innovation: How User-Centered Design Can Help Us Get the Local Control Funding Formula Right. Policy and Practice Brief. California Collaborative on District Reform (2017). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578916.pdf
Ulster, R.: 8 Steps to Implementing Design Thinking in Your Classroom, 25 July 2016. https://www.commonsense.org/education/blog/8-steps-to-implementing-design-thinking-in-your-classroom
Zheng, C., Do, E.Y.L., Budd, J.: Joinery: parametric joint generation for laser cut assemblies. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, pp. 63–74. ACM (2017)
Guzman, O.: Design Sprint in an educational context (2016). https://sprintstories.com/first-design-sprint-in-an-educational-context-c34b59eabf8d
van Ploos Amstel, D., Heemskerk, M., Jan Renes, R., Hermsen, S.: The value of agile methods in designing for behavioural change a case study. Des. J. 20(1), 681–690 (2017)
Thomas, J., Shin, C.: Implementing design sprints in the education of industrial designers. Des. Princ. Pract. Int. J. – Ann. Rev. 10, 59–73 (2016)
Shin, C., Thomas, J.: Exploring the emotional experience of the user and designer, both in the design process and classroom. Procedia Manuf. 3, 2267–2274 (2015)
Shin, C., Thomas, J.: Exploring two design processes: slow and fast. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 3–15. Springer, Cham (2017)
Nørgård, R.T., Morgan, J.: Game-centric pedagogy and curriculums in higher education. In: 29th International Academic Conference, Rome, 05 April 2017
Feldhusen, J., Brezing, A., Bungert, F., Lower, M., Yim, H., Lee, K.: An interuniversitary education concept for collaborative product development. In: The 10th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education DS 46: Proceedings of E&PDE 2008, Barcelona, Spain, 04–05 September 2008
Ovesen, N., Eriksen, K., Tollestrup, C.: Speeding up development activities in student projects with time boxing and scrum. In: The 13th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education DS 69, Proceedings of E&PDE 2011, London, UK, 08–09 September 2011
Grimheden, M.E.: Can agile methods enhance mechatronics design education? Mechatronics 23(8), 967–973 (2013)
Yim, H., Feldhusen, J., Bungert, F., Brezing, A., Lee, K., Löwer, M., Jee, H., Kim, B.: Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Collaborative Product Design Education Concept (N.D.) (2001)
Crilly, N.: ‘Fixation’ and ‘the pivot’: balancing persistence with flexibility in design and entrepreneurship. Int. J. Des. Creat. Innov. 6(1–2), 52–65 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2017.1362359
Strickfaden, M., Heylighen, A., Rodgers, P., Neuckermans, H.: Untangling the culture medium of student designs. CoDesign 2(2), 97–107 (2006)
Cardoso, C., Badke-Schaub, P.: Fixation or inspiration: creative problem solving in design. J. Creat. Behav. 45(2), 77–82 (2011)
Linsey, J.S., Tseng, I., Fu, K., Cagan, J., Wood, K.L., Schunn, C.: A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. J. Mech. Des. 132(4), 041003 (2010)
Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues 8(2), 5–21 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
Cross, N.: Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer, London (2006)
Ecker, C., Stacey, M., Earl, C.: Ambiguity is a double-edged sword: similarity references in communication. Design Society (2003)
Stacey, M., Eckert, C.: Against ambiguity. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW) 12(2), 153–183 (2003)
Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. Horizon 9(5), 1–6 (2001)
Parsons, J., Taylor, L.: Improving student engagement. Curr. Issues Educ. 14(1), 4–32 (2011)
Carlson, S., Gadio, C.T.: Teacher professional development in the use of technology. In: Haddad, W.D., Draxler, A. (eds.) Technologies for Education: Potentials, Parameters and Prospects, pp. 118–132. AED/UNESCO, Washington, DC/Paris (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Thomas, J., Strickfaden, M. (2019). From Industrial Design Education to Practice: Creating Discipline Through Design Sprints. In: Chung, W., Shin, C. (eds) Advances in Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 790. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94601-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94601-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94600-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94601-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)