Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Are You Waiting for? – Perceived Barriers to the Adoption of Fitness-Applications and Wearables

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Wearable Technologies and Game Design (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 795))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

To get a better insight into perceived barriers and motives to use fitness apps and wearables, a mixed-method study-design, consisting of both a qualitative and a quantitative part, has been used. In an online questionnaire answered by N = 166 participants, the perceived usefulness of fitness-apps as well as perceived benefits and barriers were evaluated. Additional factors such as experience with such apps and wearables, technical self-efficacy, and privacy concerns were also taken into account. Results show that fitness apps and wearables are met with approval. They are deemed useful and provide necessary information to start or keep a healthy lifestyle. Demographic variables also had an impact on the intention to use such devices. One of the biggest barriers seems to be the concern for one’s privacy, the collected data seen as rather sensitive. Also, the additional use of a wearable changes the perception and intention to use a fitness app.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lupton, D.: Self-tracking cultures: towards a sociology of personal informatics (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization: Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. WHO Press, Geneva (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hadgraft, N.T., Lynch, B.M., Clark, B.K., Healy, G.N., Owen, N., Dunstan, D.W.: Excessive sitting at work and at home: correlates of occupational sitting and TV viewing time in working adults. BMC Public Health 15, 899 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Rezende, L.F.M., Lopes, M.R., Rey-López, J.P., Matsudo, V.K.R., Do Carmo Luiz, O.: Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS ONE 9, e105620 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ernsting, C., Dombrowski, S.U., Oedekoven, M., O’Sullivan, J.L., Kanzler, M., Kuhlmey, A., Gellert, P.: Using smartphones and health apps to change and manage health behaviors: a population-based survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 19, e101 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Venkatesh, V., Walton, S.M., Thong, J.Y.L., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36, 157–178 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaewkannate, K., Kim, S.: A comparison of wearable fitness devices. BMC Public Health 16, 433 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sasaki, J.E., Hickey, A., Mavilia, M., Tedesco, J., John, D., Keadle, S.K., Freedson, P.S.: Validation of the Fitbit wireless activity Tracker(R) for prediction of energy expenditure. J. Phys. Act. Health 12, 149–154 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. An, H.-S., Jones, G.C., Kang, S.-K., Welk, G.J., Lee, J.-M.: How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps? Eur. J. Sport Sci. 17, 360–368 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Storm, F.A., Heller, B.W., Mazzà, C.: Step detection and activity recognition accuracy of seven physical activity monitors. PLoS ONE 10, e0118723 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Connell, S., Ólaighin, G., Kelly, L., Murphy, E., Beirne, S., Burke, N., Kilgannon, O., Quinlan, L.R.: These shoes are made for walking: sensitivity performance evaluation of commercial activity monitors under the expected conditions and circumstances required to achieve the international daily step goal of 10,000 steps. PLoS ONE 11, e0154956 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gillinov, S., Etiwy, M., Wang, R., Blackburn, G., Phelan, D., Gillinov, A.M., Houghtaling, P., Javadikasgari, H., Desai, M.Y.: Variable accuracy of wearable heart rate monitors during aerobic exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 49, 1697–1703 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Case, M.A., Burwick, H.A., Volpp, K.G., Patel, M.S.: Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. JAMA 313, 625–626 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meyer, J., Schnauber, J., Heuten, W., Wienbergen, H., Hambrecht, R., Appelrath, H.-J., Boll, S.: Exploring longitudinal use of activity trackers. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICHI - International Conference Healthcare Informatics, pp. 198–206 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ledger, D., McCaffrey, D.: Inside wearables: how the science of human behavior change offers the secret to long-term engagement. Endeavor Partn. 200, 1–17 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clawson, J., Pater, J.A., Miller, A.D., Mynatt, E.D., Mamykina, L.: No longer wearing: investigating the abandonment of personal health-tracking technologies on craigslist. In: UbiComp 2015, pp. 647–658 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lidynia, C., Brauner, P., Ziefle, M.: A step in the right direction – understanding privacy concerns and perceived sensitivity of fitness trackers. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds.) Advances in Human Factors in Wearable Technologies and Game Design. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 608, pp. 42–53. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Bélanger, F., Crossler, R.E.: Privacy in the digital age: a review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Q. 35, 1017–1041 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Norberg, P.A., Horne, D.R., Horne, D.A.: The privacy paradox: personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. J. Consum. Aff. 41, 100–126 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hallam, C., Zanella, G.: Online self-disclosure: the privacy paradox explained as a temporally discounted balance between concerns and rewards. Comput. Hum. Behav. 68, 217–227 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nurse, J.R.C., Williams, M., Nurse, J.R.C., Creese, S.: The perfect storm: the privacy paradox and the Internet-of-Things. In: International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dinev, T., Hart, P.: An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inf. Syst. Res. 17, 61–80 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Trepte, S., Reinecke, L., Ellison, N.B., Quiring, O., Yao, M.Z., Ziegele, M.: A cross-cultural perspective on the privacy calculus. Soc. Med. + Soc. 3, 1–13 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Beier, G.: Kontrollüberzeugungen im Umgang mit Technik [Locus of control when interacting with technology]. Rep. Psychol. 24, 684–693 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schomakers, E.-M., Lidynia, C., Vervier, L., Ziefle, M.: Of guardians, cynics, and pragmatists – a typology of privacy concerns and behavior. In: 3rd International Conference on Internet of Things, Big Data and Security. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lidynia, C., Philipsen, R., Ziefle, M.: Droning on about drones - acceptance of and perceived barriers to drones in civil usage contexts. In: Savage-Knepshield, P., Chen, J. (eds.) Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems, pp. 317–329. Springer, Heidelberg (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Warburton, D.E.R., Nicol, C.W., Bredin, S.S.D.: Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ 174, 801–809 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, I.-M., Shiroma, E.J., Lobelo, F., Puska, P., Blair, S.N., Katzmarzyk, P.T.: Impact of physical inactivity on the world’s major non-communicable diseases. Lancet 380, 219–229 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, H., Wu, J., Gao, Y., Shi, Y.: Examining individuals’ adoption of healthcare wearable devices: an empirical study from privacy calculus perspective. Int. J. Med. Inform. 88, 8–17 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants of the focus group and the survey for their willingness to share their thoughts and feelings about persuasive technologies, fitness trackers, and their privacy concerns. We also thank Niklas Kunstleben for his research support. Parts of this work have been funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under project “myneData” (KIS1DSD045).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human-Computer Interaction Center (HCIC), RWTH Aachen University, Campus-Boulevard 57, 52074, Aachen, Germany

    Chantal Lidynia, Eva-Maria Schomakers & Martina Ziefle

Authors
  1. Chantal Lidynia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eva-Maria Schomakers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martina Ziefle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chantal Lidynia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA

    Tareq Z. Ahram

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lidynia, C., Schomakers, EM., Ziefle, M. (2019). What Are You Waiting for? – Perceived Barriers to the Adoption of Fitness-Applications and Wearables. In: Ahram, T. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Wearable Technologies and Game Design. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 795. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94619-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94619-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94618-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94619-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation