Skip to main content

Inclusive Smart Parking: Usability Analysis of Digital Parking Meter for Younger and Older Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Design for Inclusion (AHFE 2018)

Abstract

When technological advances include the interaction with interfaces through smartphones in order to access a service, some older adults may be left behind because their learning abilities are not taken into account. This research aimed to perform a usability evaluation of the digital parking meter service in Guadalajara, Mexico. Nineteen people participated in this study, divided into two age groups, older adults and younger people. The main evaluated task was to make the payment of 30 min of parking using any of the three methods offered by the system. It was observed that eight older adults decided to pay at a participating store. Half of the nineteen participants rated the system as regular based on the interaction they had with it. In general, the participants pointed out that it is not easy to use the system and a lot of time has to be spent to use it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Collier, J.E., Moore, R.S., Horky, A., Moore, M.L.: Why the little things matter: exploring situational influences on customers’ self-service technology decisions. J. Bus. Res. 68(3), 703–710 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Curran, J.M., Meuter, M.L.: Self‐service technology adoption: comparing three technologies. J. Serv. Mark. 19(2), 103–113 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040510591411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma, Q., Chan, A.H.S., Chen, K.: Personal and other factors affecting acceptance of smartphone technology by older Chinese adults. Appl. Ergon. 54, 62–71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.11.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sonderegger, A., Schmutz, S., Sauer, J.: The influence of age in usability testing. Appl. Ergon. 52, 291–300 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A.L., Bitner, M.J., Roundtree, R.: The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies. J. Bus. Res. 56(11), 899–906 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00276-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. González, K.D.: Envejecimiento demográfico en México: análisis comparativo entre las entidades federativas. Conapo, 129 (2015). Retrieved from http://www.conapo.gob.mx/es/CONAPO/Envejecimiento_demografico_en_Mexico

  7. Polson, P., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., Wharton, C.: Theory-based, cognitive walkthroughs: a method for of, evaluation of user interfaces. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 36, 741–773 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barnard, Y., Bradley, M.D., Hodgson, F., Lloyd, A.D.: Learning to use new technologies by older adults: perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(4), 1715–1724 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, C., Coughlin, J.F.: PERSPECTIVE: older adults’ adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 32(5), 747–759 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gobierno de Guadalajara: Aquí hay lugar, parquímetros virtuales. Octubre 20, 2017, de Gobierno de Guadalajara (2017). Sitio web https://guadalajara.gob.mx/bienestacionado/

  11. ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs), part 11: guidance on usability specification and measures. Technical report (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nawaz, A., Skjæret, N., Helbostad, J.L., Vereijken, B., Boulton, E., Svanaes, D.: Usability and acceptability of balance exergames in older adults: a scoping review. Health Inform. J. 22(4), 911–931 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458215598638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gallardo, I.: La lectura de textos literarios en el colegio ¿porqué no leen los estudiantes? 24 Febrero 2018, de Revista Educación (2006). Sitio web http://www.redalyc.org/html/440/44030110/

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank to our research participants for their contributions to this research. We would also like to thank the Ergonomics Research Centre and the Master of Ergonomics. We are also grateful for the support and advice provided by our friend Libertad Rizo Corona.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Tejada-Gutiérrez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tejada-Gutiérrez, A., González-Torres, P., Chávez-Sánchez, I., Aceves-González, C. (2019). Inclusive Smart Parking: Usability Analysis of Digital Parking Meter for Younger and Older Users. In: Di Bucchianico, G. (eds) Advances in Design for Inclusion. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 776. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94622-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94622-1_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94621-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94622-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics