Skip to main content

Supporting Inclusive Approaches in Service Design with Netnography

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Design for Inclusion (AHFE 2018)

Abstract

This work is a part of a wider research about the inclusion in the Sharing-Based Services conceptual framework. The research presented in this paper was driven from a reflection on the ability of this kind of services to be inclusive. The main objective was discovering design domains for inclusive Sharing-Based Services detecting problems, needs and peculiar cases of online communities engaged in these services. For this reason, the netnography method was adopted to conduct a qualitative research with the aim to gain insights about inclusion and exclusion concepts on selected online forums related to platform in the Sharing-Based Services conceptual framework. The research insights were reported in the paper and they were used as a first reflection to conceptualize five design domains for inclusive services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The authors argue that it is necessary to reflect upon different human dimensions to consider what kind of factors compromise the usage of and the access to a service in all its tangible and intangible parts included aspects that affect the system around the service. Therefore, the authors proposed a first consideration that regards the usage of, the access to, and the participation in the activities provided through a service. According to these premises, they may be affected by individuals’ physical and cognitive capacities and needs, economical status, cultural and political factors [10].

  2. 2.

    This is the word to identify the Couchsurfing’s users both with the role of guest and hosts. Couchsurfing is actually a global community of 14 million people in more than 200,000 cities.

  3. 3.

    The data collection was made between the middle of 2016 and the middle of 2017. The data was reviewed and upgraded during the first months of 2018.

  4. 4.

    Please see www.airbnb.design/designing-for-access.

  5. 5.

    It is a commitment by Airbnb that invite the hosts to accept the nondiscrimination policy or cancel the profile.

  6. 6.

    For more details on the debate about the evidence for the selected keywords in relation to the platforms involved in sharing economy please see [15,16,17,18,19].

References

  1. Hine, C.: Virtual Ethnography. Sage Publications Ltd. London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kozinets, R.V.: The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities. J. Mark. Res. 39(1), 61–72 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kozinets, R.V.: Netnography: the marketer’s secret weapon. White Paper (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kozinets, R.V.: Netnography. Wiley, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mason, B.: Moving toward virtual ethnography. Am. Folklore Soc. News 25(2), 4–5 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hetland, P., Mørch, A.I.: Ethnography for investigating the internet. In: Seminar.net, vol. 12, no. 1 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hine, C.: Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Bloomsbury Publishing, Huntingdon (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stickdorn, M., Hormess M.E., Lawrence, A., Schneider, J.: This is Service Design Doing: Applying Service Design Thinking in the Real World. O’Reilly Media, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kozinets, R.V.: Is Netnography Just a Synonym for Online Ethnography? (2013). http://kozinets.net/archives/475

  10. Busciantella Ricci, D., Dong, H., Rinaldi, A., Tosi, F.: Inclusion in Sharing-Based Services (I-SBS): an analytical tool. In: Di Bucchianico, G., Kercher, P.F. (eds.) Advances in Design for Inclusion. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 587, pp. 207–219. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Busciantella Ricci, D., Dong, H., Rinaldi, A., Tosi, F.: Discussing about “Inclusion in sharing-based services”. A design workshop using an analytic tool. Des. J. 20(supp. 1), S4671–S4677 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jégou, F., Manzini, E.: Collaborative Services: Social Innovation and Design for Sustainability. Edizioni POLI.design, Milano (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manzini, E., Coad, R.: Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. MIT Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Belk, R.: You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. J. Bus. Res. 67(8), 1595–1600 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Codagnone, C., Martens, B.: Scoping the sharing economy: origins, definitions, impact and regulatory issues. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Digital Economy Working Paper 2016/01. JRC100369 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edelman, B., Luca, M.: Digital discrimination: the case of airbnb.com. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper, 14-054 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edelman, B., Luca, M., Svirsky, D.: Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: evidence from a field experiment. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper, 16-069 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ge, Y., Knittel, C.R., MacKenzie, D., Zoepf, S.: Racial and gender discrimination in transportation network companies (No. w22776). National Bureau of Economic Research (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Juul, M.: The sharing economy and tourism. Tourist accommodation. European Parliament Research Service Briefing (2015). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/568345/EPRS_BRI(2015)568345_EN.pdf

  20. Aceves-Gonzalez, C., Cook, S., May, A.: Inclusive service design: in search of better services. In: Soares, M., Rebelo, F. (eds.) Advances in Ergonomics in Design, Usability & Special Populations, Part III, Published by AHFE Conference, pp. 10–19 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Busciantella Ricci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Busciantella Ricci, D., Rinaldi, A., Tosi, F. (2019). Supporting Inclusive Approaches in Service Design with Netnography. In: Di Bucchianico, G. (eds) Advances in Design for Inclusion. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 776. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94622-1_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94622-1_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94621-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94622-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics