Skip to main content

Cognitive Biases and Distorted Decision Making that Prevent Rational and Efficient Sports Management - Cross-Cultural Difference Between MLB and NPB

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Society (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 783))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This study explored and summarized cognitive biases and distorted decision making that prevent rational and efficient sports management in markets of professional athletes, in particular, baseball. In addition to this, cross-cultural difference between MLB and NPB (Nippon Professional Baseball) was pointed out to avoid inefficiencies in baseball markets and reach rational decision making in sports management.

First, a variety of cognitive biases and distorted decision making commonly observed in both MLB and NPB were identified. It was demonstrated that cognitive biases and distorted decision making in home field advantage, draft picks, team organization, or judgment or feeling about the game itself such as momentum shift were ubiquitous in both professional baseball leagues. Throughout the comparative study of MLB and NPB in particular paying emphasis on the concentration (MLB) and the spiritualism (group harmony) (NPB), it is suggested that the cross-cultural difference potentially leads to different decision making in baseball management such as the contracting money, draft picks, or contraction with no promising players.

Cross-cultural difference between MLB and NPB is also a cause to give rise to cognitive biases or behavior in sports management or decision making. Until now, the biases that stem from cross-cultural differences have not been fully explored and identified. The biases in decision making and behavior in draft picks or making a continued contract with players peculiar to NPB and not observed in MLB have been summarized in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lewis, M.: Moneyball. W.W. Norton & Co Inc., New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis, M.: The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds. W.W. Norton & Co Inc., New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilovich, T., Vallon, R., Tversky, A.: The hot hand in basketball: on the misinterpretation of random sequences. Cogn. Psychol. 17, 295–314 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilovich, T.: Judgmental biases in the world of sports. In: Straub, W.F., Williams, J.M. (eds.) Cognitive Sports Psychology, Sports Science Associates, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koehler, J.J., Conley, C.A.: The ‘Hot Hand’ myth in professional basketball. J. Sports Exerc. Psychol. 25, 253–259 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Camerer, C.F.: Does the basketball market believe in the ‘Hot Hand’? Am. Econ. Rev. 79, 1257–1261 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moskowitz, T., Wertheim, L.J.: Scorecasting-The Hidden Influences Behind How Sports are Played and Games are Won. Three Rivers Press, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ayton, P., Fischer, I.: The hot hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy: two faces of subjective randomness? Mem. Cogn. 32, 1369–1378 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, W.O., Sauer, R.D.: Does the basketball market believe in the ‘Hot Hand’? Am. Econ. Rev. 83, 1377–1386 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burns, B.D., Corpus, B.: Randomness and induction from streaks: ‘Gambler’s fallacu’ vs. ‘Hot Hand’. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 179–184 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kahmeman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Books (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boyko, R., Boyko, A., Boyko, M.: Referee bias contributes to home advantage in English premiership football. J. Sports Sci. 25(11), 1185–1194 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gandar, J.M., Zuber, R.A., Lamb, R.P.: The home field advantage revisited: a search for the bias in other sports betting markets. J. Econ. Bus. 53(4), 439–453 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnston, R.: On referee bias, crowd size, and home advantage in the English soccer premiership. J. Sports Sci. 26(6), 563–568 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nevill, A.M., Balmer, N.J., Williams, A.M.: The influence of crowd noise and experience upon refereeing decisions in football. Psychol. Sports Exerc. 3(4), 267–272 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nevill, A.M., Holder, R.H.: Home advantage in sports: an overview of studies on advantage of playing at home. Sports Med. 28(4), 221–236 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Petterson-Lidbom, P., Priks, M.: Behavior under social pressure: empty Italian stadiums and referee bias. Econ. Lett. 108(2), 212–214 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pollard, R.: Home advantage in soccer: a retrospective analysis. J. Sports Sci. 4(3), 237–248 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwartz, B., Barsky, S.F.: The home advantage. Soc. Forces 55(3), 641–662 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, E.E., Groetzinger, J.D.: Do fans matter?: the effect of attendance on outcomes of major league baseball games. J. Quant. Anal. Sports 6(1) (2010). article 4

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sutter, M., Kocher, M.G.: Favoritism of agents: the case of referee’s home bias. J. Econ. Psychol. 25(4), 461–469 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pope, D.G., Schweitzer, M.E.: Is Tiger woods loss aversive?: persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. Am. Econ. Rev. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sabrina, T.M., Fox, C.R., Trepel, C., Poldrack, R.A.: The neural basis of loss aversion in decision making under risk. Science 315, 515–518 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Whiting, R.: The Chrysanthemum and the Bat: The Game Japanese Play. Japanime Co Ltd. (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Whiting, R.: You Gotta Have Wa. Vintage, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E.: The New Science of Having Less and How It Defines Our Lives. Picador, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsuo Murata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Murata, A. (2019). Cognitive Biases and Distorted Decision Making that Prevent Rational and Efficient Sports Management - Cross-Cultural Difference Between MLB and NPB. In: Kantola, J.I., Nazir, S., Barath, T. (eds) Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Society. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 783. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94709-9_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94709-9_65

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94708-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94709-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics