Skip to main content

Principles of Developing an Effective Environment for Affective and Pleasurable Design Team

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Affective and Pleasurable Design (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 774))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Referring to previous studies in past decades, the nature of design has changed as a tool for social interaction with attached with affective concerns. Some design scholars proposed that the environment for designing (such as the working space and working schedule) should be changed accordingly. Some design scholars propose better ways to design a working schedule and facilities for the design process. However, there are still obstacles that hinder the creation of an effective environment for designing affective and pleasurable design. Some design scholars believe that social interactions among designers would be helpful to optimise their working performance. These interactions need an appropriate setting and are influenced by the physical working environment; environments that differ to the traditional working spaces which are oppressively symbolic of hierarchy and discipline. Traditional working spaces are giving way to more effective environments to facilitate collaborative and flexible design process for affective and pleasurable design outcomes. So, this is a study to investigate how can designers make the working space more effective. Some principles would be proposed to seniors for creating the appropriate environment which would allow time and space for the design team to de-stress, open their minds, and inspire each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Richards, C., Tanquilu, N.: Sustainable solutions to ‘Complex Problem-Solving’: a key to effective community and industry engagement and partnerships by University researchers. Indonesian J. Plann. Dev. 1(1), 1–10 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Richards, C.: Using a design research approach to investigate the knowledge-building implications of online social networking and other Web 2.0 technologies in higher education contexts. In: Alias, N., Hashim, S. (eds.) Instructional Technology Research, Design and Development: Lessons from the field, pp. 117–140. IGI Global Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tarman, B., Kuran, B.: Examination of the cognitive level of questions in social studies textbooks and the views of teachers based on bloom taxonomy. Educ. Sci. Theory Pract. 15(1), 213–222 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sigogne, A., Mornas, O., Tonnellier, E., Garnier, J.L.: Co-engineering: a key-lever of efficiency for complex and adaptive systems, throughout their life cycle. In: Complex Systems Design and Management, pp. 19–37. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rahmawati, Y., Utomo, C., Anwar, N., Setijanti, P., Nurcahyo, C.B.: An empirical model for successful collaborative design towards sustainable project development. J. Sustain. Dev. 7(2), 1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eckert, C.M., Clarkson, P.J.: Planning development processes for complex products. Res. Eng. Design 21(3), 153–171 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Melo, A.F., Clarkson, P.J.: Planning and scheduling based on an explicit representation of the state of the design. In: ASME 2002 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 89–98. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity Learning in Doing: Social Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cox, M., Arnold, G., Tomás, S.V.: A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecol. Soc. 15(4), 38 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chase, J.D., Uppuluri, P., Lewis, T., Barland, I., Pittges, J.: Integrating live projects into computing curriculum. In: Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 82–83. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burke, A.: Group work: how to use groups effectively. J. Effect. Teach. 11(2), 87–95 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, S.E., Karle, S.T., Kelly, B.: An evaluation of applying blended practices to employ studio-based learning in a large-enrollment design thinking course. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 6(4), 260–280 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buede, D.M., Miller, W.D.: The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gratch, J., Marsella, S.: Psychology for the design of lifelike characters. J. Appl. Artif. Intell. Some Lessons Emot. 19, 215–233 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carmeli, A., Dutton, J.E., Hardin, A.E.: Respect as an engine for new ideas: linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity among employees and teams. Hum. Relat. 68(6), 1021–1047 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, X., Zhou, J.: Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity: Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 124(2), 150–164 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Fox, K.C., Girn, M., Parro, C.C., Christoff, K.: Functional neuroimaging of psychedelic experience: an overview of psychological and neural effects and their relevance to research on creativity, daydreaming, and dreaming (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Voogt, J., Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R.C., Hickey, D.T., McKenney, S.: Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instr. Sci. 43(2), 259–282 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kangas, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P.: Collaborative design work in technology education. In: Handbook of Technology Education, pp. 1–13 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, X., Love, P.E., Kim, M.J., Wang, W.: Mutual awareness in collaborative design: an Augmented Reality integrated telepresence system. Comput. Ind. 65(2), 314–324 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, P., Chung, T.S.: Recent advances in membrane distillation processes: membrane development, configuration design and application exploring. J. Membr. Sci. 474, 39–56 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dubowitz, T., Ncube, C., Leuschner, K., Tharp-Gilliam, S.: A natural experiment opportunity in two low-income urban food desert communities: research design, community engagement methods, and baseline results. Health Educ. Behav. 42(l), 878–968 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amic G. Ho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ho, A.G. (2019). Principles of Developing an Effective Environment for Affective and Pleasurable Design Team. In: Fukuda, S. (eds) Advances in Affective and Pleasurable Design. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 774. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94944-4_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics