Abstract
The study mainly discusses the difference between the comfort and visual fatigue in the process of reading with the two different mobile phone screens under the different conditions of the general mobile phone screen and the mobile electronic ink screen, in addition to test the performance difference between the electronic ink screen and the general mobile phone screen. This study simulated the ambient light conditions of the office, randomly selected 20 subjects from18 to 40 years old to explore the difference of reading task performance, flicker fusion frequency, visual fatigue subjective perception and electroencephalogram EEG, etc. under different conditions between the general mobile phone screen and mobile electronic ink screen, and also test the performance difference of them. The experiment adopted within-subjects design, the independent variables was different mobile phone screen (general screen, electronic ink screen), the dependent variable is the performance of the reading task. In summary, the reading experience of mobile phone with electronic ink screen is better when reading, and it is not easy to appear the phenomenon of visual fatigue, and the effect of user experience is better.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Qiao, T.: The research on interaction design of electric paper books. (Doctoral dissertation, HeFei University of Technology) (2012)
Meng, R.: Popular Research on the Development of Electronic Paper Books. (Doctoral dissertation, Henan University) (2011)
Shan, C., Jinjing, L.: The mobile reading era. Chin. New Commun. 13(3), 52–57 (2011)
Dan, W., Liuxing, L.: A study on the influence of mobile reading tools on the reading efficiency of College students’ academic literature (1), 64–72 (2017)
Standard Logarithmic Visual Acuity Chart Developed by the Eye Hospital of WMU. People’s Medical Publishing House, July 2012
Sheedy, J.E., Hayes, J., Engle, J.: Is all asthenopia the same? Optom. Vis. Sci. 80(11), 732–739 (2003)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFB0401203), and China National Institute of Standardization through the “special funds for the basic R&D undertakings by welfare research institutions” (522018Y-5942, 712016Y-4940).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lyu, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Wang, Z., Ding, L. (2019). Comparative Study on Reading Performance of Different Electronic Ink Screens. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 794. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94946-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94947-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)