Skip to main content

Bullet Graph Versus Gauges Graph: Evaluation Human Information Processing of Industrial Visualization Based on Eye-Tracking Methods

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 794))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper reports on an experimental study on industrial information visualization interface to measure the mechanism of information style, information complexity and task complexity on human information processing. Based on eye-tracking method, we conducted an experimental research study. The independent variables were information style, information complexity and task complexity. The dependent variables included time to first fixation and subjective feelings. A total of 40 subjects participated in the experiment. The main findings of this study were as follows: (1) information style, information complexity and task complexity significantly influenced the time to first fixation (P <0.05); (2) there is significant interaction between information style*information complexity, information style*task complexity, information complexity*task complexity (P <0.05); (3) the bullet graph provides more efficient reading than gauges graphs. Furthermore, the research results could provide an approach of using eye-tracking method for evaluation information visualization in relevant industrial areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shen, H., Zhang, X., Chen, W., Yuan, X., Wang, W.: Preface to the visualization and visual analysis. J. Softw. 27(5), 1059–1060 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ren, L., Du, Y., Ma, S., Zhang, X., Dai, G.: Visual analytics towards big data. J. Softw. 25(9), 1909–1936 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dai, G., Chen, W., Hong, W., Liu, S., Qu, H., Yuan, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, K.: Information visualization and visual analytics: challenges and opportunities. Chin. Sci. Inf. Sci. 43(1), 178–184 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xiaoru, Y., Xin, Z., He, X., et al.: Visualization research frontier and prospects. E-Sci. Technol. Appl. 2(4), 3–13 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ziemkiewicz, C., Kosara, R.: The shaping of information by visual metaphors. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 14(6), 1269–1276 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Keim, D., Andrienko, G., Fekete, J.D., et al.: Visual analytics: definition, process, and challenges. In: Information Visualization, pp. 154–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cook, K.A., Thomas, J.J.: Illuminating the path: The research and development agenda for visual analytics. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA, US (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wong, P.C., Shen, H.W., Johnson, C.R., et al.: The top 10 challenges in extreme-scale visual analytics. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 32(4), 63 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ministry of Industry and Information Technology on the release of industrial restructuring and upgrading in 2016 (China Manufacturing 2025) key project guide, the Ministry of Industry and Communications [2016] 433 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ware, C., Purchase, H., Colpoys, L., et al.: Cognitive measurements of graph aesthetics. Inf. Vis. 1(2), 103–110 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghoniem, M., Fekete, J.D., Castagliola, P.: On the readability of graphs using node-link and matrix-based representations: a controlled experiment and statistical analysis. Inf. Vis. 4(2), 114–135 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heer, J., Kong, N., Agrawala, M.: Sizing the horizon: the effects of chart size and layering on the graphical perception of time series visualizations. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1303–1312. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg, J., Helfman, J.: Eye tracking for visualization evaluation: reading values on linear versus radial graphs. Inf. Vis. 10(3), 182–195 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burch, M., Konevtsova, N., Heinrich, J., et al.: Evaluation of traditional, orthogonal, and radial tree diagrams by an eye tracking study. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 17(12), 2440–2448 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giacomin, J., Bertola, D.: Human emotional response to energy visualisations. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 42(6), 542–552 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cölln, M.C., Kusch, K., Helmert, J.R., et al.: Comparing two types of engineering visualizations: task-related manipulations matter. Appl. Ergon. 43(1), 48–56 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Raschke, M., Blascheck, T., Burch, M.: Visual analysis of eye tracking data. In: Handbook of Human Centric Visualization, pp. 391–409. Springer, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Steichen, B., Wu, M.M.A., Toker, D., et al.: Te, Te, Hi, Hi: eye gaze sequence analysis for informing user-adaptive information visualizations. In: International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, pp. 183–194. Springer International Publishing (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Netzel, R., Burch, M., Weiskopf, D.: Comparative eye tracking study on node-link visualizations of trajectories. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 20(12), 2221–2230 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurzhals, K., Fisher, B., Burch, M., et al.: Eye tracking evaluation of visual analytics. Inf. Vis. 15(4), 340–358 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Urribarri, D.K., Castro, S.M.: Prediction of data visibility in two-dimensional scatterplots. Inf. Vis. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871616638892

  22. Quispel, A., Maes, A., Schilperoord, J.: Graph and chart aesthetics for experts and laymen in design: the role of familiarity and perceived ease of use. Inf. Vis. 15(3), 238–252 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang, W., Huang, M.L., Lin, C.C.: Evaluating overall quality of graph visualizations based on aesthetics aggregation. Inf. Sci. 330, 444–454 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research financial supports from the Natural Science Youth Foundation of Hubei Province (2017CFB276) and CES-Kingfar Excellent Young Scholar Joint Research Funding (CES-KF-2016-2018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wu, L., Guo, L., Fang, H., Mou, L. (2019). Bullet Graph Versus Gauges Graph: Evaluation Human Information Processing of Industrial Visualization Based on Eye-Tracking Methods. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 794. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_74

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_74

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94946-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94947-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics