Abstract
This paper aims to propose an approach to include a holistic user experience (UX) perspective in the development of an assistive technology for mobility, more precisely an intelligent powered wheelchair (IPW). First, the UX related to the anticipated experience (powered wheelchair users, caregivers, clinicians) was obtained in a previous study in order to define technological and functional specifications. Second, the UX related to the episodic and momentary experience were highlighted within a Living lab approach. In that framework, we tested with end-users an IPW in an ecological setting, a mall. For our next step, we propose a methodology to apprehend the cumulative experience. This study will take into account co-users, i.e. co-workers, other pedestrians, etc., that most studies do not take into account and that, in diverse ecological settings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barcenilla, J., Bastien, J.-M.-C.: L’acceptabilité des nouvelles technologies: quelles relations avec l’ergonomie, l’utilisabilité et l’expérience utilisateur ? Le travail Humain 4(72), 311–331 (2009)
Simpson, R.C.: Smart wheelchairs: a literature review. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 42(4), 423–436 (2005)
World Health Organization: Guideline on the Provision of Manual Wheelchairs in Less-Ressourced Settings. WHO Press, Geneva (2008)
Kairy, D., et al.: Users’ perspectives of intelligent power wheelchair use for social participation. In: Conference Proceeding RESNA 36th International Conference on Technology and Disability, Bellevue (2013)
Kairy, D., et al.: Exploring powered wheelchair users and their caregivers’ perspectives on potential intelligent power wheelchair use: a qualitative study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11(2), 2244–2261 (2014)
Rushton, P.W., et al.: The potential impact of intelligent power wheelchair use on social participation: perspective of users, caregivers and clinicians. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 10(3), 191–197 (2014)
Boucher, P., et al.: Design and validation of an intelligent wheelchair towards a clinically-functional outcome. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 10, 58 (2013)
Pineau, J., Atrash, A., Kaplow, R., Villemure, J.: On the design and validation of an intelligent powered wheelchair: lessons from the SmartWheeler project. In: Brain, Body and Machine: Proceedings of an International Symposium on the Occasion of the 25th Anniversary of McGill University Centre for Intelligent Machines Series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol. 83, pp 259–270 (2010)
Tsang, E., Ong, S.C.W., Pineau, J.: Design and evaluation of a flexible interface for spatial navigation. In: Conference on Computer Robot Vision, Toronto (2012)
Heylighen, A., Bianchin, M.: How does inclusive design relate to good design? Des. Stud. 34, 93–110 (2013)
Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience - a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)
Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., Hoonhout, J.: User experience white paper bringing clarity to the concept of user experience. In: Result from Dagstuhl Seminar on Demarcating User Experience, Dagstuhl, pp. 1–12 (2011)
Wang, R.H., Mihailidis, A., Dutta, T., Fernie, G.R.: Usability testing of multimodal feedback interface and simulated collision-avoidance power wheelchair for long-term-care home residents with cognitive impairments. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 48(7), 801–822 (2011)
Guerdira, Y., Farcy, R., Desailly, E., Bellik, Y.: Évaluation cinématique d’une interface tactile pour le pilotage d’un fauteuil roulant électrique: une étude pilote. In: AFIHM 29th Conference francophone sur l’Interaction Homme-Machine, Poitiers, pp. 281–290 (2017)
Jutai, J.W., Fuhrer, M.J., Demers, L., Scherer, M.J., DeRuyter, F.: Toward a taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84(4), 294–302 (2005)
Bastien, J.-M.-C., Scapin, D.L.: Ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of human-computer interfaces. Technical report Institut National de Recherche en Information et Automatique RT-0156 (1993)
Programme d’habiltés en fauteuil roulant. http://www.wheelchairskillsprogram.ca/
Finstad, K.: The system usability scale and non-native english speakers. J. Usability Stud. 1(4), 185–188 (2006)
Brooke, J.: SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)
Mollo, V., Falzon, P.: Auto- and allo-confrontation as tools for reflective activities. Appl. Ergon. 35(6), 531–540 (2004)
Rix, G., Biache, M.-J.: Enregistrement en perspective subjective située et entretien en re-situ subjectif: une methodologie de la constitution de l’expérience. Intellectica 1(38), 363–396 (2004)
McLellan, S., Muddimer, A., Peres, S.C.: The effect of experience on system usability scale ratings. J. Usability Stud. 7(2), 56–67 (2012)
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank the CRIR-Living Lab Vivant team who have supported our project from the beginning. We also thank the management of Place Alexis-Nihon for welcoming us into their space. These projects and the first author were funded by FQRNT (INTER Strategic Network), NSERC Canadian Network on Field Robotics (NCFRN), and NCE AGE-WELL. Without the team of students and clinicians, the ever-changing project would not have been possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hébert, AM., Archambault, P., Kairy, D. (2019). Towards a Macroscopic View of Using an Assistive Technology for Mobility for Its Development: Assessing Users’ and Co-users’ Experience. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 794. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_83
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_83
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94946-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94947-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)