Skip to main content

Human-Centered Design of Computerized Prosthetic Leg: A Questionnaire Survey for User Needs Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology (AHFE 2018)

Abstract

In Thailand, there are approximately 2 million people with disabilities and nearly 50,000 people living with lower limb loss. Previous research investigates the quality of life and factors affecting quality of life of transfemoral and transtibial amputees after receiving prosthesis using a method of WHOQOL – BREF – THAI. However, the WHOQOL – BREF – THAI is a questionnaire that is used to investigate quality of life for normal people not for people living with lower limb loss. Recent records show a lack of satisfaction with the traditional passive prosthetic leg and needs of new active prosthesis with different motor functions. The objective of this research is to design and develop a questionnaire, using human-centered design principles for investigating and improving the quality of life of transfemoral and transtibial amputees after receiving prostheses. The new questionnaire is created based upon both prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ) and trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales (TAPES). This questionnaire survey explores user’s satisfaction, usability study, product appearance, comfort and pain, and cleansing and handling the prosthesis. A total of 24 subjects are randomly selected. Data collection and analysis are made from a list of patients in Sirindhorn School of Prosthetics and Orthotics and Veterans General Hospital in Thailand. From the amputees’ point of view, defining their needs is one of the most critical factors in the first step for prosthesis design. Veterans has asked for modern prostheses and they believe that modern prostheses can help them feel more comfortable and natural while performing activities of daily living and improve their quality of life. As a result, this research project provides a list of needs of people living with lower limb loss in Thailand. Findings have indicated that user needs assessment is necessary and critical to make a better computerized lower limb prosthesis design and improve user’s satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Limbs International: Why Limbs. https://www.limbsinternational.org/why-limbs.html

  2. Gailey, R., McFarland, L.V., Cooper, R.A., Czerniecki, J., Gambel, J.M., Hubbard, S., Maynard, C., Smith, D.G., Raya, M., Reiber, G.E.: Unilateral lower-limb loss: Prosthetic device use and functional outcomes in servicemembers from Vietnam war and OIF/OEF conflicts. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 47, 317–332 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities: Situation Report on Persons with Disabilities in Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  4. Murray, C.D., Fox, J.: Body image and prosthesis satisfaction in the lower limb amputee. Disabil. Rehabil. 24, 925–931 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Segal, A.D., Orendurff, M.S., Klute, G.K., McDowell, M.L., Pecoraro, J.A., Shofer, J., Czerniecki, J.M.: Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg® and Mauch SNS® prosthetic knees. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 43, 857–870 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lawson, B.E., Mitchell, J., Truex, D., Shultz, A., Ledoux, E., Goldfarb, M.: A robotic leg prosthesis: Design, control, and implementation. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 21, 70–81 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Au, S., Berniker, M., Herr, H.: Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits. Neural Netw. 21, 654–666 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Au, S.K.S.K., Weber, J., Herr, H.: Powered ankle-foot prosthesis improves walking metabolic economy. IEEE Trans. Robot. 25, 51–66 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawson, B.E., Varol, H.A., Huff, A., Erdemir, E., Goldfarb, M.: Control of stair ascent and descent with a powered transfemoral prosthesis. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 21, 466–473 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiménez-Fabián, R., Verlinden, O.: Review of control algorithms for robotic ankle systems in lower-limb orthoses, prostheses, and exoskeletons. Med. Eng. Phys. 34, 397–408 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wentink, E.C., Schut, V.G.H., Prinsen, E.C., Rietman, J.S., Veltink, P.H.: Detection of the onset of gait initiation using kinematic sensors and EMG in transfemoral amputees. Gait Posture 39, 391–396 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dindo, H., Lo Presti, L., La Cascia, M., Chella, A., Dedić, R.: Hankelet-based action classification for motor intention recognition. Rob. Auton. Syst. 94, 120–133 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Varol, H.A.H.A., Sup, F., Goldfarb, M.: Multiclass Real-time intent recognition of a powered lower limb prosthesis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57, 542–551 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sup, F., Bohara, A., Goldfarb, M.: Design and control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis. Int. J. Rob. Res. 27, 263–273 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tucker, M.R., Olivier, J., Pagel, A., Bleuler, H., Bouri, M., Lambercy, O., del Millán, J.R., Vallery, H., Gassert, R.: Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 12, 1 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sup, F., Varol, H.A.H.A., Mitchell, J., Withrow, T.J.T.J., Goldfarb, M.: Preliminary evaluations of a self-contained anthropomorphic transfemoral prosthesis. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics. 14, 667–676 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lawson, B.E., Varol, H.A., Goldfarb, M.: Standing stability enhancement with an intelligent powered transfemoral prosthesis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58, 2617–2624 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, M., Zhang, F., Datseris, P., Huang, H.: Improving finite state impedance control of active-transfemoral prosthesis using dempster-shafer based state transition rules. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. Theory Appl. 76, 461–474 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun, J., Voglewede, P.A.: Powered transtibial prosthetic device control system design, implementation, and bench testing. J. Med. Device. 8, 11004 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jimenez-Fabian, R., Geeroms, J., Flynn, L., Vanderborght, B., Lefeber, D.: Reduction of the torque requirements of an active ankle prosthesis using a parallel spring. Rob. Auton. Syst. 92, 187–196 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rouse, E.J., Mooney, L.M., Martinez-Villalpando, E.C., Herr, H.M.: Clutchable series-elastic actuator: Design of a robotic knee prosthesis for minimum energy consumption. In: IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Beckerle, P., Christ, O., Schürmann, T., Vogt, J., von Stryk, O., Rinderknecht, S.: A human–machine-centered design method for (powered) lower limb prosthetics. Rob. Auton. Syst. 95, 1–12 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sirasaporn, P.: Quality of life of trans-femoral and trans-tibial amputees after receiving prosthesis. J. Thai. Rehabil. Med. 20, 4–9 (2553)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Legro, M.W., Reiber, G.D., Smith, D.G., Del Aguila, M., Larsen, J., Boone, D.: Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79, 931–938 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Legro, M.W., Reiber, G., del Aguila, M., Ajax, M.J., Boone, D.A., Larsen, J.A., Smith, D.G., Sangeorzan, B., Aguila, M., Megan, J., Boone, D.A., Larsen, J.A., Smith, D.G.: Issues of importance reported by persons with lower limb amputations and prostheses. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 36, 155–163 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gallagher, P., MacLachlan, M.: Development and psychometric evaluation of the trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales (TAPES). Rehabil. Psychol. 45, 130–154 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Creswell, J.: Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Oaks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gauthier-Gagnon, C., Grisé, M.C., Potvin, D.: Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80, 706–713 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Harpe, S.E.: How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn. 7, 836–850 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Edwards, A.L.: Statistical Methods for the Behavioral Sciences (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Teo, T.: Modelling technology acceptance in education: a study of pre-service teachers. Comput. Educ. 52, 302–312 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Christ, O., Jokisch, M., Preller, J., Beckerle, P., Wojtusch, J., Rinderknecht, S., Von Stryk, O., Vogt, J.: User-centered prosthetic development: Comprehension of amputees’ needs. Biomed. Tech. 57, 1098–1101 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by National Research Council of Thailand. The authors thankfully acknowledge the support of the Sirindhorn School of Prosthetics and Orthotics and Veterans General Hospital in Thailand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nantakrit Yodpijit .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yodpijit, N., Jongprasithporn, M., Khawnuan, U., Sittiwanchai, T., Siriwatsopon, J. (2019). Human-Centered Design of Computerized Prosthetic Leg: A Questionnaire Survey for User Needs Assessment. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 794. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_98

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_98

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94946-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94947-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics