Going Atmospheric and Elemental: Roger Moore’s and Timothy Dalton’s James Bond and Cold War Geo-Politics
Using the Second Cold War (ca. 1974–1987) as a primary focus, this chapter contends that the “Bond formula” is neither formulaic nor institutionally ritualized as the term implies. It becomes more atmospheric, elemental, and resourceful. Three factors enable this shift. First, the emergence of blockbuster films and new techniques of production and marketing that encourage spectacle, lavishness, and scale. Second, spectacular set design associated with Ken Adam offers up immersive and impressive environments for Bond to grapple with. Finally, environmental degradation, climate change, and space-based imagery of Earth inform a global consciousness. Bond and his allies, both American and occasionally Soviet, prevent unthinkable (but not unimaginable) global destruction and normalize Anglo-American geopolitical power.
- Barth, K.-H. 2000. Detecting the Cold War. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Black, J. 2001. The Politics of James Bond. Newport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Chapman, J. 2000. Licence to Thrill: A Cultural History of the James Bond Films. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Doel, R., and C. Harper, eds. 2016. Exploring Greenland: Cold War Science and Technology on Ice. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Eco, U. 2009. “Narrative Structures in Fleming.” In The James Bond Phenomenon: A Critical Reader, edited by C. Lindner. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Fleming, I.  2012. Casino Royale. Las Vegas: Thomas and Mercer.Google Scholar
- Fleming, J. 2010. Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Frayling, C. 2005. Ken Adam and the Art of Production Design. London: Faber.Google Scholar
- Funnell, L. 2011. “Negotiating Shifts in Feminism: The ‘Bad’ Girls of James Bond.” In Women on Screen: Feminism and Femininity in Visual Culture, edited by M. Waters. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- ———. 2017a. Geographies, Genders, and Geopolitics of James Bond. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Hamblin, J. 2005. Oceanographers and the Cold War. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
- Kaiser, D. 2006. “The Physics of Spin: Sputnik Politics and American Physicists in the 1950s.” Social Research 73, no. 4: 1225–1252.Google Scholar
- King, G. 2000. Spectacular Narratives: Hollywood in the Age of the Blockbuster. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
- Parker, M. 2015. Goldeneye. London: Windmill Books.Google Scholar
- Planka, S. 2015. “Female Bodies in James Bond Title Sequences.” In For His Eyes Only? The Women of James Bond, edited by L. Funnell. London: Wallflower Press.Google Scholar
- Shaw, T., and D. Youngblood. 2010. Cinematic Cold War: The American and Soviet Struggle for Hearts and Minds. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
- Sheller, M. 2014. Aluminum Dreams. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Sloterdijk, P. 2009. Terror from the Air. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
- Turchetti, S., and P. Roberts, eds. 2015. The Surveillance Imperative: Geosciences during the Cold War and Beyond. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- United Nations. 1958. Convention on the Continental Shelf. http://www.cfr.org/world/united-nations-convention-continental-shelf/p21071.
- US Department of State. 1963. Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water. https://www.state.gov/t/isn/4797.htm.