Advertisement

The Strategy-Structure-Process-Performance Framework

  • Mikihisa NakanoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This book uses the SSPP framework, which is a contingency theory framework used in the research fields of strategic management and organizational design. In this chapter, each construct (external environment, strategy, structure, process, and performance) is defined and the relationships among these constructs are explained.

References

  1. Armistead, C., Harrison, A., & Rowlands, P. (1995). Business process re-engineering: Lessons from operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(12), 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barney, J. B. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bourgeois, L. J., III. (1980). Strategy and environment: A conceptual integration. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, H., Daugherty, P. J., & Roath, A. S. (2009). Defining and operationalizing supply chain process integration. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(1), 63–84.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 119–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  7. Davenport, T. H., & Beers, M. C. (1995). Managing information about processes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Defee, C. C., & Stank, T. P. (2005). Applying the strategy-structure-performance paradigm to the supply chain environment. International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(1), 28–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dill, W. R. (1958). Environment as an influence on managerial autonomy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(4), 409–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Co.Google Scholar
  12. Galbraith, J. R. (2002). Designing organizations: An executive guide to strategy, structure, and process. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing organizations: Strategy, structure, and process at the business unit and enterprise levels. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Galbraith, J. R., & Nathanson, D. A. (1978). Strategy implementation: The role of structure and process. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  15. Germain, R., Claycomb, C., & Dröge, C. (2008). Supply chain variability, organizational structure, and performance: The moderating effect of demand unpredictability. Journal of Operations Management, 26, 557–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lambert, D. M. (Ed.). (2006). Supply chain management: Processes, partnerships, performance (2nd ed.). Sarasota, FL: Supply Chain Management Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  18. Mentzer, J. T., Stank, T. P. & Esper, T. L. (2008). Supply chain management and its relationship to logistics, marketing, production, and operations management. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 31–46.Google Scholar
  19. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Nakano, M. (2015). Exploratory analysis on the relationship between strategy and structure/processes in supply chains: Using the strategy-structure-processes-performance paradigm. International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(2), 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakano, M., & Akikawa, T. (2014). Literature review of empirical studies on SCM using the SSPP paradigm. International Journal of Production Economics, 153, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oliver, R. K., & Webber, M. D. (1982). Supply-chain management: Logistics catches up with strategy. In M. Christopher (Ed.) (1992), Logistics: The strategic issues (pp. 63–75). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Rodrigues, A. M., Stank, T. P., & Lynch, D. F. (2004). Linking strategy, structure, process, and performance in integrated logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(2), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stank, T. P., & Traichal, P. A. (1998). Logistics strategy, organizational design, and performance in a cross-border environment. Logistics and Transportation Review, 34(1), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walton, R. E. (1989). Up and running: Integrating information technology and the organization. MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyoto Sangyo UniversityKita-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations