Advertisement

Performance Trade-Offs

  • Mikihisa NakanoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Considering the SSPP framework, the construct of performance is explained. Specifically, the details of typical performance indicators can be categorized into two kinds: efficiency and responsiveness, and the trade-off between efficiency and responsiveness is explained.

References

  1. Emerson, C. J., & Grimm, C. M. (1996). Logistics and marketing components of customer service: An empirical test of the Mentzer, Gomes and Krapfel model. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 26(8), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Frazelle, E. (2015). Inventory strategy: Maximizing financial, service, and operations performance with inventory strategy. NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Handfield, R. B., & Nichols, E. L., Jr. (1999). Introduction to supply chain management. NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Japan Institute of Logistics Systems. (2018). Logistics cost research report (FY2017).Google Scholar
  5. Mentzer, J. T., & Moon, M. A. (2005). Sales forecasting management (2nd ed.), CA: SAGE publications.Google Scholar
  6. Melnyk, S. A., Davis, E. W., Spekman, R. E., & Sandor, J. (2010). Outcome-driven supply chains. Sloan Management Review, Winter, 33–38.Google Scholar
  7. Mentzer, J. T., Gomes, R., & Krapfel, R. E. (1989). Physical distribution service: A fundamental marketing concept? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17(1), 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nakano, M., & Akikawa, T. (2014). Literature review of empirical studies on SCM using the SSPP paradigm. International Journal of Production Economics, 153, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nikkei Business. (2009). Nissan and Honda revamped their procurement policies because of strong yen. (November 23).Google Scholar
  10. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2000). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies, and case studies. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Shimono, Y. (2005). Profit and risk sharing in Japanese automobile supply chains: A comparison of Toyota and Nissan. Organizational Science, 39(2), 67–81. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  12. Tomino, T. (2012). Seisan shisutemu no shijo tekiou ryoku: Jikan o meguru kyousou (Adaptability to market fluctuation of production system: Tine-based competition). Tokyo: Dobunkan Shuppan. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  13. Tomino, T., Shintaku, J., & Kobayashi, M. (2014). Global supply chain management in Toyota. MMRC DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES, No. 463 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  14. Trent, R. J. (2004). What everyone needs to know about SCM. Supply Chain Management Review. March, 52–59.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyoto Sangyo UniversityKita-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations