Advertisement

Hybrid Strategy

  • Mikihisa NakanoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

A hybrid strategy, that is, both efficiency- and responsiveness-oriented strategy, is ideal for adoption only by firms that can reduce demand uncertainty through some ingenuities. Therefore, some advanced structures (internal: integrated organization; external: partnerships with main suppliers and customers) and processes (internal: postponement, sales and operations planning; external: collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment) are explained.

References

  1. Akikawa, T. (2014). Realization factors of sales and operations planning. Journal of Marketing & Distribution, 17(1), 1–21. (in Japanese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Crum, C., & Palmatier, G. E. (2003). Demand management best practices. FL: J. Ross Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Dreyer, H. C., Alfnes, E., Strandhagen, J. O., & Thomassen, M. K. (2009). Global supply chain control systems: A conceptual framework for the global control centre. Production Planning & Control, 20(2), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gligor, D. M. (2014). The role of demand management in achieving supply chain agility. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 577–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grimson, J. A., & Pyke, D. F. (2007). Sales and operations planning: An exploratory study and framework. International Journal of Logistics Management, 18(3), 322–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hill, C. A., Zhang, G. P., & Miller, K. E. (2018). Collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment & firm performance: An empirical evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 196, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hulthén, H., Näslund, D., & Norrman, A. (2016). Framework for measuring performance of the sales and operations planning process. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46(9), 809–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Katayama, Y., & Arizumi, S. (2004). Building direct production and supply systems for printer configuration. IE Review, 45(1), 23–28. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  9. Lambert, D. M., Emmelhainz, M. A., & Gardner, J. T. (1996). Developing and implementing supply chain partnerships. International Journal of Logistics Management, 7(2), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ling, R. C., & Goddard, W. E. (1988). Orchestrating success: Improve control of the business with sales and operations planning. VT: Oliver Wright Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Logi-Biz. (2013). Ricoh: An arrival point by its SCM sophistication of the decade, March 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Nagashima, M., Lassagne, M., Morita, M., & Kerbache, L. (2015). Dynamic adaptation of supply chain collaboration to enhance demand controllability. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology & Management, 29(3/4), 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakano, M., & Matsuyama, K. (2016). Empirical studies of Japanese manufacturers on organizational structures of supply chain management: From process operation and process change viewpoints. In Proceedings: 23rd EurOMA Conference.Google Scholar
  14. Nikkei Information Strategy. (2005). Ricoh: Logistics cost reduction by plant kitting, September 2015.Google Scholar
  15. Prokopets, L. (2012). S&OP: What you can learn from the top performers. Supply Chain Management Review, May/June, 28–35.Google Scholar
  16. Skjoett-Larsen, T., Thernøe, C., & Andresen, C. (2003). Supply chain collaboration: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(6), 531–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Småros, J. (2007). Forecasting collaboration in the European grocery sector: Observations from a case study. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 702–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Trentin, A., & Forza, C. (2010). Design for form postponement: Do not overlook organization design. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(4), 338–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Whipple, J. M., & Russell, D. (2007). Building supply chain collaboration: A typology of collaborative approaches. International Journal of Logistics Management, 18(2), 174–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zinn, W., & Bowersox, D. J. (1988). Planning physical distribution with the principle of postponement. Journal of Business Logistics, 9(2), 117–136.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyoto Sangyo UniversityKita-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations