Supply Chain Process Change

  • Mikihisa NakanoEmail author


First, referring to the theories of organizational change and process change, the viewpoints in discussions on supply chain process changes are discussed. Next, based on the theory of dynamic capabilities, a model of supply chain process change consisting of three phases, that is, sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring, is introduced. Using the model, success and failure factors in each phase are discussed.


  1. Beckhard, R., & Harris, R. (1977). Organizational transitions. MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Bolstorff, P., & Rosenbaum, R. (2007). Supply chain excellence: A handbook for dramatic improvement using the SCOR model (2nd ed.). NY: American Management Association.Google Scholar
  3. Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  4. Davenport, T. H., & Beers, M. C. (1995). Managing information about processes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grover, V. (1999). From business reengineering to business process change management: A longitudinal study of trends and practices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46(1), 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grover, V., & Kettinger, W. J. (1995). Business process change. PA: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Guha, S., Grover, V., Kettinger, W. J., & Teng, J. T. C. (1997). Business process change and organizational performance: Exploring an antecedent model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(1), 119–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. NY: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  10. Hayes, J. (2010). The theory and practice of change management (3rd ed.). NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Imai, M. (2012). Gemba kaizen: A commonsense approach to a continuous improvement strategy (2nd ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Inaba, M. (1985). Soshiki henkaku ni okeru Ikou katei no kanri. Organizational Science, 19(4), 46–60. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  13. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Stoddard, D. B. (1998). Business process redesign: Radical and evolutionary change. Journal of Business Research, 41, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kao Corporation annual security report 2008–2011.Google Scholar
  15. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1, 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lion Corporation annual security report 2008–2011.Google Scholar
  18. Martinsons, M. G. (1995). Radical process innovation using information technology: The theory, the practice and the future of reengineering. International Journal of Information Management, 15(4), 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nadler, D. A. (1981). Managing organizational change: An integrative perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17(2), 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nadler, D. A. (1982). Managing transitions to uncertain future states. Organizational Dynamics, 11(1), 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nadler, D. A. (1998). Champions of change: How CEOs and their companies are mastering the skills of radical change. CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Nakano, M. (2013). Continuous process reforms to achieve a hybrid supply chain strategy: Focusing on the organization in Ricoh. In C. Munson (Ed.), The supply chain management casebook (pp. 210–219). New Jersey: FT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Nakano, M., & Oji, N. (2012). The transition from a judgmental to an integrative method in demand forecasting: A case study of a Japanese company. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(4), 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakano, M., & Oji, N. (2017). Success factors for continuous supply chain process improvement: Evidence from Japanese manufacturers. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications, 20(3), 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakano, M., Akikawa, T., & Shimazu, M. (2013). Process integration mechanisms in internal supply chains: Case studies from dynamic resource-based view. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications, 16(4), 328–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nikkei Marketing Journal. (2013). Fascinating scent (June 3).Google Scholar
  27. Sanders, N. R., & Ritzman, L. P. (2004). Integrating judgmental and quantitative forecasts: Methodologies for pooling marketing and operations information. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(5), 514–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scott Morton, M. S. (Ed.). (1991). The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Stoddard, D. B., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). Business process redesign: Tactics for managing radical change. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tichy, N. M., & Devanna, M. A. (1986). The transformational leader. NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1997). Winning through innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Hoek, R., Johnson, M., Godsell, J., & Birtwistle, A. (2010). Changing chains: Three case studies of the change management needed to reconfigure European supply chains. International Journal of Logistics Management, 21(2), 230–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyoto Sangyo UniversityKita-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations