Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Supply Chain Management pp 189–214Cite as

Supply Chain Process Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 8867 Accesses

Abstract

First, referring to the theories of organizational change and process change, the viewpoints in discussions on supply chain process changes are discussed. Next, based on the theory of dynamic capabilities, a model of supply chain process change consisting of three phases, that is, sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring, is introduced. Using the model, success and failure factors in each phase are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beckhard, R., & Harris, R. (1977). Organizational transitions. MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolstorff, P., & Rosenbaum, R. (2007). Supply chain excellence: A handbook for dramatic improvement using the SCOR model (2nd ed.). NY: American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Beers, M. C. (1995). Managing information about processes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V. (1999). From business reengineering to business process change management: A longitudinal study of trends and practices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46(1), 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V., & Kettinger, W. J. (1995). Business process change. PA: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, S., Grover, V., Kettinger, W. J., & Teng, J. T. C. (1997). Business process change and organizational performance: Exploring an antecedent model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(1), 119–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. NY: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. (2010). The theory and practice of change management (3rd ed.). NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, M. (2012). Gemba kaizen: A commonsense approach to a continuous improvement strategy (2nd ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inaba, M. (1985). Soshiki henkaku ni okeru Ikou katei no kanri. Organizational Science, 19(4), 46–60. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Stoddard, D. B. (1998). Business process redesign: Radical and evolutionary change. Journal of Business Research, 41, 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao Corporation annual security report 2008–2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1, 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lion Corporation annual security report 2008–2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinsons, M. G. (1995). Radical process innovation using information technology: The theory, the practice and the future of reengineering. International Journal of Information Management, 15(4), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D. A. (1981). Managing organizational change: An integrative perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17(2), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D. A. (1982). Managing transitions to uncertain future states. Organizational Dynamics, 11(1), 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D. A. (1998). Champions of change: How CEOs and their companies are mastering the skills of radical change. CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano, M. (2013). Continuous process reforms to achieve a hybrid supply chain strategy: Focusing on the organization in Ricoh. In C. Munson (Ed.), The supply chain management casebook (pp. 210–219). New Jersey: FT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano, M., & Oji, N. (2012). The transition from a judgmental to an integrative method in demand forecasting: A case study of a Japanese company. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(4), 386–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakano, M., & Oji, N. (2017). Success factors for continuous supply chain process improvement: Evidence from Japanese manufacturers. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications, 20(3), 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakano, M., Akikawa, T., & Shimazu, M. (2013). Process integration mechanisms in internal supply chains: Case studies from dynamic resource-based view. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications, 16(4), 328–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikkei Marketing Journal. (2013). Fascinating scent (June 3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, N. R., & Ritzman, L. P. (2004). Integrating judgmental and quantitative forecasts: Methodologies for pooling marketing and operations information. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(5), 514–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott Morton, M. S. (Ed.). (1991). The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, D. B., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). Business process redesign: Tactics for managing radical change. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), 81–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N. M., & Devanna, M. A. (1986). The transformational leader. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1997). Winning through innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Hoek, R., Johnson, M., Godsell, J., & Birtwistle, A. (2010). Changing chains: Three case studies of the change management needed to reconfigure European supply chains. International Journal of Logistics Management, 21(2), 230–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kyoto Sangyo University, Kita-ku, Kyoto, Japan

    Mikihisa Nakano

Authors
  1. Mikihisa Nakano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikihisa Nakano .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nakano, M. (2020). Supply Chain Process Change. In: Supply Chain Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8479-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation