Skip to main content

A Fuzzy Graph Recurrent Neural Network Approach for the Prediction of Radial Overcut in Electro Discharge Machining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 561 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 127))

Abstract

Manufacturing of goods rely on its design methodology and the process parameters. The parameters used in manufacturing process play an important role to build a quality product. Initially heuristic techniques are used for parameter selection. Many researchers conducted research to predict the radial overcut using neural networks. Besides, fuzzy neural network gains more popularity due to presence of fuzzy system and neural network. In this paper fuzzy graph recurrent neural network architecture is used for modelling and predicting the radial over cut for an electro discharge machining information system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gershwin SB (2000) Design and operation of manufacturing systems: the control-point policy. IIE Trans 32(10):891–906

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tangen S (2003) An overview of frequently used performance measures. Work Study 52(7):347–354

    Google Scholar 

  3. Slack N, Chambers S, Johnston R (2010) Operations management. Pearson education, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fenoughty KA, Jawaid A, Pashby IR (1994) Machining of advanced engineering materials using traditional and laser techniques. J Mater Process Technol 42(4):391–400

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davim JP (2013) Nontraditional machining processes. In: Manufacturing process selection handbook, pp 205–226

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abbas NM, Solomon DG, Bahari MF (2007) A review on current research trends in electrical discharge machining (EDM). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(7–8):1214–1228

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang JH, Lee TC, Lau WS, Ai X (1997) Spark erosion with ultrasonic frequency. J Mater Process Technol 68(1):83–88

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ming W, Ma J, Zhang Z, Huang H, Shen D, Zhang G, Huang Y (2016) Soft computing models and intelligent optimization system in electro-discharge machining of SiC/Al composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(1–4):201–217

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tso GK, Yau KK (2007) Predicting electricity energy consumption: a comparison of regression analysis, decision tree and neural networks. Energy 32(9):1761–1768

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roy AR, Maji PK (2007) A fuzzy soft set theoretic approach to decision making problems. J Comput Appl Math 203(2):412–418

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Grzymala-Busse JW (1988) Knowledge acquisition under uncertainty—a rough set approach. J Intell Rob Syst 1(1):3–16

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang X, Pardalos PM (2014) A survey of support vector machines with uncertainties. Ann Data Sci 1(3–4):293–309

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simoff SJ (1996) Handling uncertainty in neural networks: an interval approach. In: Proceedings of international conference on neural networks (ICNN’96), vol 1. IEEE, New York, pp 606–610

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu J, Zheng C, Chien CC, Zheng L (2006) A comparative study of Monte Carlo simple genetic algorithm and noisy genetic algorithm for cost-effective sampling network design under uncertainty. Adv Water Resour 29(6):899–911

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pontes FJ, Ferreira JR, Silva MB, Paiva AP, Balestrassi PP (2010) Artificial neural networks for machining processes surface roughness modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49(9–12):879–902

    Google Scholar 

  16. Das R, Pradhan MK (2014) General regression neural network and back propagation neural network modeling for predicting radial overcut in EDM: A comparative study. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatron Manuf Eng 8(4):799–805

    Google Scholar 

  17. Behrens A, Ginzel J (2003) Neuro-fuzzy process control system for sinking EDM. J Manuf Process 5(1):33–39

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rangajanardhaa G, Rao S (2009) Development of hybrid model and optimization of surface roughness in electric discharge machining using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm. J Mater Process Technol 209(3):1512–1520

    Google Scholar 

  19. Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, Meyarivan T (2000) A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: International conference on parallel problem solving from nature. Springer, Berlin, pp 849–858

    Google Scholar 

  20. Panda DK (2010) Modelling and optimization of multiple process attributes of electro discharge machining process by using a new hybrid approach of neuro–grey modeling. Mater Manuf Process 25(6):450–461

    Google Scholar 

  21. Livingstone DJ, Manallack DT, Tetko IV (1997) Data modelling with neural networks: advantages and limitations. J Comput Aided Mol Des 11(2):135–142

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pradhan MK, Das R (2015) Application of a general regression neural network for predicting radial overcut in electrical discharge machining of AISI D2 tool steel. Int J Mach Mach Mater 17(3–4):355–369

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai KM, Wang PJ (2001) Comparisons of neural network models on material removal rate in electrical discharge machining. J Mater Process Technol 117(1–2):111–124

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Y (2004) The research on the GA-based neuro-predictive control strategy for electric discharge machining process. In: Proceedings of 2004 international conference on machine learning and cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No. 04EX826), vol 2. IEEE, New York, pp 1065–1069

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kuriakose S, Shunmugam MS (2005) Multi-objective optimization of wire-electro discharge machining process by non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. J Mater Process Technol 170(1–2):133–141

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenfeld A (1975) Fuzzy graphs. In: Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 77–95

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mordeson JN, Chang-Shyh P (1994) Operations on fuzzy graphs. Inf Sci 79(3–4):159–170

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Gao XZ, Ovaska SJ, Dote Y (2000) Motor fault detection using Elman neural network with genetic algorithm-aided training. In: SMC 2000 conference proceedings, vol 4. IEEE, New York, pp 2386–2392

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amrut Ranjan Jena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jena, A.R., Acharjya, D.P., Das, R. (2021). A Fuzzy Graph Recurrent Neural Network Approach for the Prediction of Radial Overcut in Electro Discharge Machining. In: Tripathy, A., Sarkar, M., Sahoo, J., Li, KC., Chinara, S. (eds) Advances in Distributed Computing and Machine Learning. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 127. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4218-3_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics