Abstract
With the evolution of social media, information sharing in online is turning into ubiquitous each and every day. Various facts are propagating thru online social networks along with each the wonderful and negative. In this paper, our essential focal point is to resolve terrible or incorrect data such as rumors. Rumor is a serious problem in online social media. The wrong rumors can create many problems in society; hence, it is important to block these rumors. First in this paper, we have compared Naive Bayes algorithm and logistic regression for deciding which algorithm is better for spam classification. Then, we have proposed a model for detecting spammers in twitters and automatically blocking those rumors by hindering an assured subset of the nodes. In order to decrease the influence of the rumors, nodes are allotted an acceptance time threshold. If a user posts the rumor more than a particular threshold, the user gets automatically blocked. We have created a Java-based Web application using tomcat SQL server, JavaScript html and CSS, like Facebook where a user can search for friends, accept friend requests, chat with them, change profile pictures and post messages. In this paper, we used a supervised learning technique known as Naive Bayes Algorithm for blocking of the users. The analysis of users blocked per month can be also done which will help in study of users and rumor details.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fazil M, Abulaish M (2018) A hybrid approach for detecting automated spammers in Twitter. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Secur 13(11)
Amleshwaram AA, Reddy N, Yadav S, Gu G, Yang C (2013) CATS: characterizing automation of Twitter spammers. IEEE, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Texas A&M University
Talha A, Kara R (2017) A survey of spam detection methods on Twitter. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl (IJACSA) 8(3)
Rajadesingan A, Zafarani R, Liu H (2015) Sarcasm detection on Twitter: a behavioral modeling approach. In: WSDM’15, Shanghai, China, 2–6 Feb 2015
Concone F, Lo Re G, Morana M, Ruocco C (2019) Twitter spam account detection by effective labelling. In: CEUR-WS.org/Vol-2315
Chatzakouy D, Kourtellisz N, Blackburnz J, De Cristofaro E, Stringhini G, Vakali A (2017) Mean birds: detecting aggression and bullying on Twitter, 12 May 2017
Martinez-Romo J, Araujo L (2012) Detecting malicious tweets in trending topics using a statistical analysis of language. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Shuy K, Slivaz A, Wangy S, Tang J, Liuy H (2017) Fake news detection on social media: a data mining perspective, 3 Sept 2017
Benhardus J, Kalita J (2013) Streaming trend detection in Twitter. Int J Web Based Commun 9(1)
Vishwarupe V, Bedekar M, Pande M, Hiwale A (2018) Intelligent Twitter spam detection: a hybrid approach, Jan 2018
Fernandes MA, Patel P, Marwala T (2015) Automated detection of human users in Twitter. Procedia Comput Sci 53:224–231
Washhaa M, Qaroushb A, Mezghania M, Sedesa F (2017) A topic-based hidden Markov model for real-time spam tweets filtering
DeBarr D, Wechsler H (2012) Spam detection using random boost, 24 Mar 2012
Delany SJ, Buckley M, Greene D (2012) SMS spam filtering: methods and data. Expert Syst Appl 39
Bajaj S, Garg N, Singh SK (2017) A novel user-based spam review detection. Procedia Comput Sci 122
Naem AA, Ghali NI, Saleh AA (2018) Antlion optimization and boosting classifier for spam email detection. Future Comput Inform J 3
Biggio B, Fumera G, Pillai I, Roli F (2011) A survey and experimental evaluation of image spam filtering techniques. Pattern Recogn Lett 32
Farisa H, Al-Zoubia AM, Heidarib AA, Aljaraha I, Mafarja M, Hassonaha MA, Fujitad H (2019) An intelligent system for spam detection and identification of the most relevant features based on evolutionary Random Weight Networks. Inform Fusion 48
Inuwa-Dutse I, Liptrott M, Korkontzelos I (2018) Detection of spam-posting accounts on Twitter. Neurocomputing 315
Wang B, Chen G, Fu L, Song L, Wang X, Liu X (2016) DRIMUX: dynamic rumor influence minimization with user experience in social networks
Arkalgud N (2018) Logistic regression for spam filtering, 14 Feb 2008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vanmathi, C., Mangayarkarasi, R. (2021). An Analysis of Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Automated Spammer in Twitter. In: Tripathy, A., Sarkar, M., Sahoo, J., Li, KC., Chinara, S. (eds) Advances in Distributed Computing and Machine Learning. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 127. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4218-3_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4218-3_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4217-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4218-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)